Anyone with a discerning eye reading this article would note:
The FDA has received multiple reports of people who needed medical attention and hospitalization after taking ivermectin meant for livestock.
… and of course Doctors are blocked from prescribing it (the human kind), and pharmacist won’t fill prescriptions for it. Some doctors have had the extreme measure of having their license suspended or worse. Doctors aren’t prescribing “horse paste” and not allowed to order ivermectine off label for their patients. Why? It would be reasonable to allow physicians to write prescriptions for the human version to be filled at pharmacies. Ivermectin is part of an course of treatment under a doctors care that has efficacy and should be approved for early treatment, at least until there are readily available alternatives to hospitalization.
Then later in the article it mentions:
The two other drugs in the study are fluvoxamine, a medicine often prescribed for depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder, and fluticasone furoate, a steroid medication prescribed through an inhaler for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
All three drugs are approved for use in humans, are proven to be safe, and are easy to use at home, the newspaper reported. They also rarely interact with other medications, which could make them good options to treat mild to moderate cases of COVID-19.
England, France, Ireland, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden and the Norway are moving to end or loosen their restrictions even with rising cases due to omicron. It is obvious that many cases are asymptomatic in the working population absence of chronic health comorbidities.
So many people will now have some level of immunity, either from vaccination or from surviving an infection, that the region may be moving into a “period of higher protection,” which should be seen as a “cease-fire” and “a plausible endgame” in the pandemic, the official, Dr. Hans Kluge, told reporters at a virtual news conference.
Well, of course it would be reasonable to allow doctors to prescribe Ivermectin - it is a Nobel Peace Prize-winning wonder drug that has cured disease(s) IN HUMANS all over the planet.
Yet, this Nobel Peace Prize-winning drug has been slandered as “horse paste” for some reason - without the benefit of having proved it is NOT helpful in prevention or treatment.
It makes a rational mind think there is another agenda.
As MORE evidence comes out that (1) the vaccines do NOT work as they were designed improperly, (2) the vaccines cause more harm than good, and (3) prophylactic measures such as free government-dispensed Vitamin D and yes Ivermectin (and other pre-existing approved drugs) should have been the starting point, it ain’t gonna be pretty.
Uh-oh … not a good day to be a Covid vaccine suppoerter.
Project Veritas says they have the goods on our government KNOWING that HCQ and IVM were effective in treating Covid.
If the government KNEW it and yet prohibited use of these drugs, is that a crime?
MOTIVES? If there was an effective therapy for Covid, then there could be no vaccine approval? To preserve the revolving door between the FDA/CDC and Big Pharma? Orange Man Bad?
Not good - but then we wait on Duke University - and other pending studies.
In a nutshell, SARS-COV-II leaked by accident from a Wuhan lab. The virus itself was created by scientists modifying a related Coronavirus. The circumstantial evidence is very damming. Fauci shares some of the blame as he is/was a big proponent of virus gain of function research that has proved to be drastically more dangerous than it is worth.
"Conclusion
THE CURRENT SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been, and continues to be, a public health catastrophe—the most serious in a century. Questions about the origins of COVID-19 are, at once, matters of legal, financial, and moral concern. For the moment, researchers can do no better than to hope for an inference to the best explanation; and, for the moment, the best explanation seems to be that the virus escaped from the WIV.
The WIV was the biggest transporter of viruses to Wuhan from all over Asia, including many SARS-like viruses from Laos and Yunnan. Phylogenetic analysis shows that the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak was perfectly localized in Wuhan, as all strains that have been found in other locations are descendants of the Wuhan strain. Had the virus been circulating undetected in other parts of China, virologists would have eventually noted those pre-Wuhan strains and their descendants in the phylogenetic tree. Even after sequencing over six million SARS-CoV-2 genomes, no evidence has been found of pre-Wuhan SARS-CoV-2.
Not only was the WIV the biggest reservoir of SARS-like viruses in Wuhan, if not the world, its scientists were engaged in creating novel SARS-like and MERS-like chimeras and potentially supercharging their transmissibility and pathogenicity. With these circumstances in mind, consider the following facts:
Shi and Jiang were experts in spike protein cleavage and were working on a pan-coronavirus therapeutic to inhibit post-cleavage fusion of the virus with cell membranes.
Jiang had previously created a novel furin cleavage site via a 12-nucleotide insertion, though not in a coronavirus.
In a joint grant proposal the WIV and EcoHealth submitted to DARPA they suggested creating novel human-specific cleavage sites.
Taken together, these points make the 12-nucleotide insertion that has created a novel furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2—so uncharacteristic of SARS-like viruses—look extremely suspicious.
The behavior of the WIV and its scientists also raises any number of troubling questions. The viral strain RaTG13 is a case in point. First collected by the WIV in 2013, RaTG13 was sequenced in 2018, but not disclosed until after the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. In their initial disclosure, the WIV failed to mention how or when they came to possess RaTG13, failed to indicate that it was previously called Ra4991, failed to cite their own 2016 paper first mentioning it, and seemed to imply that they only sequenced the sample after the outbreak. This does not seem like the behavior of scientists trying their utmost to establish how a Laotian or Yunnan virus came to cause an outbreak in Wuhan.
None of these points is in itself conclusive, but the circumstantial evidence is more suggestive of a lab leak than an act of nature."
Working on a new COVID booster. In this case, it would be spray. By directly targeting the area that virus infects such as the nasal passages, it should produce a more targeted immune response increasing its effectives. (For instance, going beyond just prevent hospitalization/death but being productive from catching/spreading the virus entirely)
We got FIVE iterations of the truth from Fauci regarding whether HE FUNDED gain of function research. I’m all FOR investigating ALL of this. Why has it not been done already? Something tells me that day is coming, real soon.
I’m not a doctor, but it seems that a vaccine that targets the respiratory tract DIRECTLY is the way to go, as those injected into the blood stream seem to be misdirected? Doctors are telling me this is indeed the case - that the current experimental “vaccines” are not properly designed and are the reason we’re having all these vascular and cardiac issues. I’ll be happy to entertain any such new nasal vaccine when I see data supporting its long-term safety.
Note that it is going to be the same stuff in the vaccines as that is only way to get approval in a short period of time. There will be no “long-term” safety info as anything long term would be too late vs the rate of change of the virus. It will be the same safety info they already have on mRNA vaccines plus some short term human trials probably.
Also, it may only be available as a booster so those that would rather go with this more targeted/less invasive approach maybe out of luck.
I think the nasal route makes a lot of sense and it is too bad they didn’t do this sooner.
That being the case, I think I’ll just stick with the “horse paste”, Vitamin D3 (50 ng/ml in my blood tests), and Zinc - all perfectly safe and effective against Covid.
In general, the well done studies for Zinc/Vitamin D have been a big disappointment for COVID. I would have thought they would have some benefit. However, I still think it is a good idea to get plenty of sun in the winter months and take say 10 to 30 mg zinc if one is vegan but it is mistake to use that as your sole means of defense against COVID. (I as I said before, horse paste only if you have worms!)
If you don’t like the pharmaceuticals, I suggest lose weight(if overweight) till achieve ideal BMI as COVID loves fat. If have type 2 diabetes, do whatever you can not to be. It is these two things(besides having an older population) that makes the U.S. particularly vulnerable to COVID. COVID is not going away in our life times so need to think about long term solutions about becoming/maintaining ones health as well as possible.
Here is the complete list of medical conditions that makes one particularly susceptible to severe COVID per the CDC. (Probably should just have said everyone?!) Nearly impossible for one not to become vulnerable to COVID at some point.
Chronic liver disease: according to the CDC, 1.8% of U.S. adults are diagnosed with liver disease.
Chronic lung diseases: this includes asthma, which affects about 8% of U.S. adults, and COPD, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis, which affect about 5% of U.S. adults. All according to the CDC.
Neurological disorders, including dementia: statistics are harder here, but dementia affects about 11% of Americans age 65 and older, according to the Alzheimer’s Association.
Diabetes, both types: this affects 10.5% of all people and 13% of all adults in the U.S., increasing further to 26.8% among those aged 65 and older, according to the CDC.
Down syndrome: this is the most common chromosonal disorder, affecting about 1 in every 700 babies born in the U.S., according to the CDC.
Heart conditions, including coronary artery disease, which affects about 6.7% of U.S. adults, but also high blood pressure, which affects about 47% of U.S. adults.
HIV infection: according to the CDC, nearly 1.2 million people in the U.S. had HIV at the end of 2019.
Weakened immune system: this can be from basically anything, including if you take corticosteroids (including hydrocortisone).
Mental health conditions: this includes mood disorders (like depression), which affect an estimated 9.7% of U.S. adults. An estimated 21.4% of U.S. adults will experience a mood disorder at some point in their lives. According to the National Institute of Mental Health.
Overweight and obesity: approximately 73.6% of U.S. adults fall within the parameters that the CDC has put into this comorbidity category (BMI > 25).
Pregnancy, including recent pregnancy: suffice it to say that a lot of people become pregnant or were recently pregnant.
Sickle cell disease or thalassemia: sickle cell disease affects approximately 100,000 Americans, according to the CDC (who acknowledge that actual prevalence here is hard to estimate).
Smoking, current OR former: currently, about 14% of U.S. adults are current smokers, according to the CDC. But add in former smokers? Much higher, obviously.
Solid organ or blood stem cell transplant: I couldn’t find good stats here, but the HRSA says there are currently 106,000 people on the transplant waiting list and 39,000 transplants performed in the U.S. in 2020, but anyone who’s ever had a transplant is in this category.
Stroke or cerebrovascular disease: according to the CDC, more than 795,000 Americans have a stroke EVERY YEAR and about 610,000 of these are first or new strokes.
Substance use disorders: according to a study by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (part of the NIH), about 10 percent of U.S. adults have had substance use disorders at some time in their lives.
Tuberculosis: incidence is overall low, according to the CDC (2.2 cases per 100,000 persons), but higher in people living in congregate settings.
Excerpts from a Senate Inquiry of DMED and followup letter shown below. 5 years of data before “vaccines” were in use compared to present. What happened to Military personnel’s health after inoculations against Covid started in use? Remember, correlation does not proved causation, but what does it suggest?:
WASHINGTON — On Tuesday, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), ranking member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, sent a letter to Department of Defense (DOD) Secretary Lloyd Austin highlighting concerning reports from three DOD whistleblowers about injuries to servicemen and women potentially related to the COVID-19 vaccines. At the senator’s January 24 roundtable titled COVID-19: A Second Opinion, the senator heard testimony about data from a DOD database showing dramatic increases in medical diagnoses among military personnel.
The senator wrote , “Based on data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), Thomas Renz, an attorney who is representing three Department of Defense (DoD) whistleblowers, reported that these whistleblowers found a significant increase in registered diagnoses on DMED for miscarriages, cancer, and many other medical conditions in 2021 compared to a five-year average from 2016-2020. For example, at the roundtable Renz stated that registered diagnoses for neurological issues increased 10 times from a five-year average of 82,000 to 863,000 in 2021.”
Based on data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), Renz reported that these whistleblowers found a significant increase in registered diagnoses on DMED for miscarriages, cancer, and many other medical conditions in 2021 compared to a five-year average from 2016-2020. For example, at the roundtable Renz stated that registered diagnoses for neurological issues increased 10 times from a five-year average of 82,000 to 863,000 in 2021. There were also increases in registered diagnoses in 2021 for the following medical conditions:
· Hypertension – 2,181% increase
· Diseases of the nervous system – 1,048% increase
· Malignant neoplasms of esophagus – 894% increase
· Multiple sclerosis – 680% increase
· Malignant neoplasms of digestive organs – 624% increase
· Guillain-Barre syndrome – 551% increase
· Breast cancer – 487% increase
· Demyelinating – 487% increase
· Malignant neoplasms of thyroid and other endocrine glands – 474% increase
· Female infertility – 472% increase
· Pulmonary embolism – 468% increase
· Migraines – 452% increase
· Ovarian dysfunction – 437% increase
· Testicular cancer – 369% increase
· Tachycardia – 302% increase
WASHINGTON — On Tuesday, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), ranking member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, sent a letter to Department of Defense (DOD) Secretary Lloyd Austin highlighting concerning reports from three DOD whistleblowers about injuries to servicemen and women potentially related to the COVID-19 vaccines. At the senator’s January 24 roundtable titled COVID-19: A Second Opinion, the senator heard testimony about data from a DOD database showing dramatic increases in medical diagnoses among military personnel.
The senator wrote , “Based on data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), Thomas Renz, an attorney who is representing three Department of Defense (DoD) whistleblowers, reported that these whistleblowers found a significant increase in registered diagnoses on DMED for miscarriages, cancer, and many other medical conditions in 2021 compared to a five-year average from 2016-2020. For example, at the roundtable Renz stated that registered diagnoses for neurological issues increased 10 times from a five-year average of 82,000 to 863,000 in 2021.”
These were younger healthy adults before the year inoculations began to be used in the military. With a leaky mRNA vaccine the spike proteins attach to various organs throughout the body and may be expected to cause previously unidentified adverse effects.
New study: 133x risk of myocarditis after COVID vaccination
Comparisons with myocarditis rates following infection now irrelevant as vaccination no longer prevents infection.
A recent study published on January 25, 2022, on JAMA Network, has shown that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133 times greater than the background risk in the population.
The study, conducted by researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) as well as from several U.S. universities and hospitals, examined the effects of vaccination with products manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. The study’s authors used data obtained from the CDC’s VAERS reporting system which were cross-checked to ensure they complied with CDC’s definition of myocarditis; they also noted that given the passive nature of the VAERS system, the number of reported incidents is likely to be an underestimate of the extent of the phenomenon.
1626 cases of myocarditis were studied, and the results showed that the Pfizer-BioNTech product was most associated with higher risk, with 105.9 cases per million doses after the second vaccine shot in the 16 to 17 age group for males, and 70.7 cases per million doses after the second shot in the 12 to 15 age group for males. The 18 to 24 male age group also saw significantly higher rates of myocarditis for both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s products (52.4 and 56.3 cases per million respectively).
The study found that median time to symptom onset was two days, and that 82 percent of cases were in males, consistent with previous studies. Around 96 percent of affected people were hospitalized, with most treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; 87 percent of those hospitalized had resolution of symptoms by time of discharge.
At the time of data review, two reports of death in people younger than 30 years of age with potential myocarditis still remained under investigation and were not included in the case counts.
Among the reported symptoms were: chest pain, pressure, or discomfort (89%), shortness of breath (30%), abnormal ECG results (72%), and abnormal cardiac MRI findings (72%).
The study’s authors noted that myocarditis following vaccination appeared to resolve more swiftly than in typical viral cases; however, given that vaccination is no longer considered a reliable way in which to avoid COVID infection, it is unclear whether this has any specific relevance to the cost-benefit analysis of COVID vaccination, especially considering the low risk of complications following coronavirus infection for the age group most at risk for heart-related complications following vaccination.
Given the plethora of studies confirming a link between vaccination and myocarditis, the CDC has commenced active surveillance of adolescents and young adults to monitor their progress following heart-related incidents after vaccination. Long-term outcome data, however, are not yet available. >
In the meantime, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology advise that people with myocarditis should refrain from competitive sports for three to six months, and only resume strenuous exercise after normal ECG and other test results are obtained. In addition, they advise that further mRNA vaccine doses should be deferred.
In conclusion, the study’s authors note that myocarditis is a “rare but serious adverse event that can occur after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination … [and that] the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men. This risk should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination.”
Perhaps this is reason enough to eliminate mandates to inoculate K-12 age children. Perhaps this is also part of the explanation why there are growing movements to eliminate Covid mandates in the working age population. The DMED statistics in the previous post is enough to startle any sane person and give pause. Consider if science has been replaced by political agendas for control and bureaucratic overreach at all levels.
Perhaps we should drop the requirements for Polio, Diphtheria,
Tetanus, Pertussis, Measles, Mumps, Chickenpox, Rubella while we are at it-hey?
Looks like vaccines cause Myocarditis in what… 0.01 % of everyone?
Note that COVID causes Myocarditis in 0.146% with the average incident in the non Covid population for Myocarditis being 0.009% which is VERY close to 0.01% in the vaccinated crowd. Is is possibly that Myocarditis has actually nothing to do with the vaccines? Isn’t it far more likely it is actually the result of the poor quality data in VARS to begin with or simply coincidence cases of Myocarditis or people that have been vaccinated but developed Myocarditis from COVID? You just posted a whole lot of nothing
Smallpox is more contagious and deadly than Covid-19 with a 30 percent mortality rate , smallpox was one of history’s biggest killers.
The overall case-fatality rate for Diphtheria is 5%–10% , with higher death rates (up to 20%) among persons younger than 5 and older than 40 years of age
Current statistics indicate that mortality in mild and moderate Tetanus is approximately 6%; for severe tetanus, it may be as high as 60%. Mortality in the United States resulting from generalized tetanus is 30% overall , 52% in patients older than 60 years, and 13% in patients younger than 60 years.
The annual worldwide incidence of Pertussis is estimated to be 48.5 million cases, with a mortality rate of nearly 295,000 deaths per year . The case-fatality rate among infants in low-income countries may be as high as 4%.
Vaccine development is a long, complex process, often lasting 10-15 years and involving a combination of public and private involvement.
Not surprising your defensive and sarcastic (or uniformed?) reply to a rather comprehensive post is infantile at best. I’ll try to keep my response short, unfortunately there is so much that can be commented on. You are appearing to be purposely obtuse on what facts have actually been emerging this past year, or perhaps have just lost all objectivity as to what has been happening in the world as a result of the Wuhan Virus. It’s possible you are just not keeping informed. It’s even possible you are no longer able to process information that is staring you in the face! Maybe you don’t even read what is posted in any detail anymore. Is that because you just know it all already? Do you think the government is always truthful and has it right all the time? Maybe some people don’t trust the government and mainstream media because government officials and bureacracy have been responsible for spreading misinformation and lies time and time again?
You make it sound like it’s easy to discern fact from misinformation. What’s your barometer, anything the CDC or Fauci tells you is fact?
It’s VAERS, not VARS, and I concur with your estimates on myocarditis in adults, but not applied to children. I think I may have made that point quite clear in the text of my previous post. If you also watched the video clip in that post you would know why the VAERS system is estimated to only report between 1%-10% of the information out there on adverse reactions to the PFE vaccine! It is a time consuming form to fill out, and next to impossible for the public to do so. Many doctors don’t even know it’s out there. I also made it quite clear in my Dec 21 post last year that the percentage of adverse events is VERY SMALL:
I guess you didn’t conclude anything from the DMED data that parallels the VAERS data in much greater detail. Maybe you just didn’t comprehend it or note it’s significance. The point being that “vaccination” entails risk. Potential risk of HARM should be weighed against benefit. As of last October there were less than 3000 cases of 5-17 yr olds reported by the CDC (see Oct 21 post). “With children, the risk of harm from COVID is negligible, approaching zero risk as reported by the CDC, until they started to be vaccinated.” John Hopkins just published a report that lockdowns and masking is of no benefit in controlling the spread of cases in schoolage children, yet there is a great deal of evidence compiled that it is doing irreparable harm. For a realist you seem to be skipping much of the newer data out there. Think about it. Has a risk vs benefit approach been applied to current Public Health Covid protection policies, or has it been misdirected?
Mike, you are exceptionally bright and widely recognized on the forum when it comes to your knowledge on mining and mining stocks. I can’t say the same on what you are posting on this thread as objective factual views. Perhaps you posted a very simply answer a while back.
I posted something I thought was quite relevant about that same time:
Unfortunately, you came up with what you must truly believe is the one universal answer that will solve everything:
I only agree with 1/2 of what you said there. On second thought, I only agree on 1/3 of what you said there - “It’s very easy. Look at the science.” Not reporting science, or censoring what is out there leaves half the population ignorant and vulnerable to government controlled narratives. Do you know that the United Kingdom and European Union posted updated adverse events statistics in late January showing people in those regions are continuing to report problems at an unusually high rate after taking mRNA vaccines?
The data show that as of January 19, the U.K. Yellow Card system reported 1,552,248 adverse events, mostly associated with Pfizer BioNTech’s mRNA vaccines (1,286,984), followed by AstraZeneca (231,168), Moderna (32,936), and unspecified vaccines (1,160). The European Medicines Agency’s latest EudraVigilance update on January 24 reported a total of 1,428,060 adverse event reports, led by cases associated with Pfizer BioNTech (722,454), followed by AstraZeneca (442,029), Moderna (215,196) and Janssen (48,381)
Public health policy, especially mandates, need to recognize that natural protection gained from previously infected and recovered individuals have greater protection than that offered by any of the currently approved EUA vaccines (and Comirnaty is the PFE-BioNTech’s COVID Vaccine “approved” version). Mandates are causing great damage to lives and the economy. It makes no sense to arbitrarily punish those in essential work positions that have worked continuously over the past 18 months without vaccination.
You may want to see what this link has to say about mandates and children:
The WCH now says that people who have taken the vaccine or had Covid-19 will have the spike protein running around their body - and has now published steps one can take to get rid of the spike protein, ONE OF WHICH IS TAKING IVERMECTON. You can’t make this crap up.
FYI…the WHO isn’t the same as the WCH. (Honest mistake. Noncredible organizations like to mimic credible ones.) Let’s just say the WCH isn’t quite as credible…
"The World Council’s steering committee is a coalition of fringe figures who have been critical of vaccines. These include Mark Trozzi, a Canadian physician who was recently barred from issuing “medical exemptions for COVID-19 vaccines, masking requirements and testing,” CBC reported, as well as Dr. Tess Lawrie, a member of the BIRD Group, which has promoted ivermectin, an unproven COVID “treatment,” and raised unfounded questions about vaccine safety. (The organization also lists Robert F. Kennedy’s Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine group, as one of its affiliates.)
Yes, the WCH - and not the WHO as I originally wrote.
If it does not concern a rational human that reputable doctors all over the world are in disagreement about Covid and the “vaccines”, then there’s absolutely nothing I can do for you!
To this day, the CDC’s website STILL says the spike protein is “harmless” and is expelled from the human body within a “few days” after vaccination. Unbelievable.
