Auryn/Medinah 2025 2nd half General Discussion

AUMC and MDMN leadership both allowed this to happen. Don’t let them deflect by saying this is an MDMN issue. How about you pay the dam filing fee MC and we’ll collectively reimburse you. Wtf

Glad to see they addressed the stockpile on the update. Hopefully thats enough to quiet the hairless eagle down on that topic. 28k tons at $4.1k/oz is looking fantastic. That’s plenty to pay back Maurizo in full plus the debt. I’d like to see more on the $20M service agreement (inexcusable), but that will be part of the AISC. Looks like Baldy is way off on saying they will need another financing raise. The operation will generate plenty to self fund whatever direction they take. He was correct AGAIN though on timing while the Wizard was way off by suggesting July 2025 (smh).

Also nice to see that they are using this time to separate out the lower grade ore for calibration. Decent update, but its looking like Spring to Summer of 2026 (not 2025!) before there’s any meaningful cashflow finally generated.

1 Like

Love this - adding to their existing stockpile and continue to extract additional ore.

Looks like they’re doing the best they can do time-wise, which is fine by me. PROGRESS.

image

1 Like

Does any of this stuff in the red circles look like piles of ore to you?

New pics on “X”:

AURYN Mining Corp (@aurynmining) / X

1 Like

Thanks Doc! I don’t have X. Please can someone send links

Sorry but another nothing burger of an update. Permitting for the floatation plant coming months?? How many 3,4,5,6.., ? Wow disappointing…but not surprised was waiting for something like this.

Why would that quite me down? They specifically say that they will be using low grade feed during the commissioning? There’s quite a big difference b/w a pile of rock and a pile of ore but it was nice that they specifically addressed this topic (maybe they read TMP, LOL). Not sure how you can assert what the stockpiles can pay off without having any guidance on grades.

If I were an investor it may irk me a bit when reading the update using terms like “on schedule”, or “as planned” when they are currently 15 months past orginal forecasts for production. Its also a bit concerning that they are anticipating having to wait another several months for permitting. I’ve never seen a plant built prior to having permits in hand but that was clearly a risk Maurizio was willing to take.

While pictures or any evidence of 20-60k tones of stockpiled ore with some guidance on grade would have been extremaly helpful, let’s table the stockpile debate for now and just assume they will have feedstock for the plant when its finally built. As in investor is this stock, the level of detail in these updates are so incredbily light, I’m not sure how anyone could anticipate generating any buying interest. For non-investors, this creates a wonderful opportunity to buy shares, post production if they deem to do so.

Feels like Feb/March commissioning may be closer to March/April but impossible to say given how little we know.

1 Like

No but this might be the stockpiled ore

1 Like

Hey BE, here’s something else we can table - your assertion that Hochschild looked at this mountain and decided to just move on, presumably because there was nothing worth their time there. I have a friend who’s invested in Skeena up in British Columbia. Hochschild had entered an agreement with Skeena in 2021 to acquire up to 60% of the Snip gold project, located in British Columbia’s Golden Triangle. Hochschild was supposed to spend approximately C$100 million in development expenditures. In April 2023, Hochschild terminated its option and notified Skeena that it would not proceed with its earn-in.

THE REASON: Hochschild stated it was focusing capital on more “advanced-stage” projects elsewhere in its portfolio.

The ADL was not an “advance-stage” project back in 2023, right?

Everyone was having a rough time back then, and in Dec 2021 the share price of Hochschild had dropped precipitously due to Covid, from $4 to $1.34 reaching a low of $0.54 in September.

I’d say Hochschild didn’t do ANYTHING on the ADL and just abandoned it. So, it’s not fair to say they expressed an opinion one way or the other on whether the ADL was commercial.

2 Likes

For perspective. If anyone cares to gain any. This is a picture of the Peruvain plant (they are building at 350tpd CIL vs AUMCs 100tpd plant). This picuture is taken in June. They received permits, before beginning construction, and have plans to commission the plant in February.

Compare the above picture to the one just provided by AUMC

Does Feb/March seem like a reasonable start date?

Also worth noting: b/c the Peruvian company is fully permitted, they moved all of the key equipment to site several months ago as can be seen the following picture. It take a long arss time to haul all of this stuff up a mountain.

Its pretty evident that AUMC has not moved the equipment up. I assume b/c they are waiting on permits.

I’m not throwing out 2026 predictions to sow doubt. Its just the realities of mining which are often lost on this board.

2 Likes

John. I presume this is a company you are invested in? Can you provide us the stock symbol for this company

Thanks

Yes they did, that's been the plan all along. Use lower grade ore while calibrating everything. The stockpiles were strategically divided by grade ahead of time.

OCT Shareholder Update

  • **Geology and metallurgy teams continued evaluating and segregating stockpiled material at Fortuna by grade.

  • **Commissioning strategy: During the plant’s 30-to-45-day commissioning period, we plan to run lower-grade material to fine-tune recovery and operating parameters before processing higher-grade ore.

Likewise, I'm sure you can agree that one cannot assert those same stockpiles as being a pile of 'rock' — instead of ‘ore’ ... unless they had already been divided by grades.

When it comes to JR Miners, it’s common for ‘Scheduled Plans’ to be re-scheduled due to various setbacks beyond the miner's control. For that reason, I am not easily ‘irked’ about plans being *‘on schedule’* or *‘as planned’*.   
 Although I am disappointed this isn’t happening faster, I know Auryn is putting forth their best possible efforts to get this done.

Per the update:
Permitting: We expect to receive the remaining approvals for the Flotation Plant and tailings facility in the coming months."

 I agree that there's a *possibility* it could be longer, but this does not translate to **‘several months’.**                                                                                                                                        
 You say *'several months'*, the update says *"in the coming months"* ... there's a difference between the two, imho.
2 Likes

Nice conservative estimate, since we know it will probably be far higher than $4.1k/oz, based on the info we already have.

Exactly, and I’m sure most miners (starting up an FF plant) use the same strategy. It’s clear they separated the piles of lower grade ore from … what? From the piles of higher grade ore.

Jimmy, I’d give your post a ‘LIKE’, but I don’t totally agree with your comment about the timing issue - It’s not that cut & dry, imho. I’d have to consider any assumptions vs any comments made according to Auryn’s stated plan at that point in time. Maybe it’s just me, idk.

2 Likes

Here’s an interesting post from February . AUMC filed for their permits in January. Assuming they receive the permits it will have taken at least a year. For anyone familiar with real world mining this is not abnormal nor a knock on Maurizio. Amazing how often accurate predictions are initially labeled as “dire” and then quickly brushed under the rug. Way back when I posted that I was suprised that AUMC had ordered any equipment before receiving permits (typically wait for an engineering permit so you know what equipment to order). Building and then “asking for permission” at a later date saves time but is a riskier route to take. The Peruvian company experienced massive delays in receiving their permits and they did it the “right” way. I have little doubt that AUMC will ultimately receive their permits but to say “in the coming months”, 10 months post submission, should lead to some pause in the euphoria (although we all know it won’t).

Maybe it has something to do with the fact that Auryn falls under the Small Miner statute in Chile?

The MINIMUM they can produce from an adit is 1,000 tons per month, right?

So, it’s not a long step from there to buy equipment supporting minimum production?

Seems pretty clear to me.

Clear as mud? You are confusing the exploitation licence (mining) with the permits for the plant (months away).

Can we all agree that we are not going to see any cash flow until 3rd-4th quarter 2026.

I was curious where the term ***"dire"*** came from. It's clear to see that you didn't just snatch that off the top of your head. You're quoting brecciaboy using the word 'dire' to describe the predictions claiming it will be "light years away" before DL2 is permitted.

Obviously plans were interrupted and/or maybe MC used bad judgment when requesting that specific permit, as you stated. He had good reason to believe all the permitting would move along quickly.

Euphoria? Not quite.  That word is more of an exaggeration when describing shareholders' feelings right now, imo.  :melting_face:  It's difficult to be euphoric knowing possible delays may clog the plans.
As a shareholder, I don’t feel *euphoric* *(ie: exhilarated or enraptured)* at all.  I'm saving that for the day Auryn announces production progress & grades via news releases! Then it's party time, yeah. 
Right now feelings are more like *anticipation.* And I would prefer ***'anticipation'*** *(of good news)*  over the occasional ***'apprehensive'*** predictions of failure; which applies to wild negative claims without supporting them with Auryn's latest communications.`

**WOW, AUMC ended the day at $1.01 pps!  I think a few ppl here had varying predictions regarding how high the share price will go before production.**
1 Like

Some thoughts on the new update: In the first paragraph, management reminds us that we need to keep in mind that Auryn is now operating on 3 fronts: MINING, EXPLORATION, AND CONSTRUCTION.

In the second paragraph, management followed up on something they introduced in the last update dated 7/15/25. This has to do with opening up 2 new operational sites at the historical “FORTUNA 1913” location near level 2. Each site will allow Auryn to increase production by 1,000 Tonnes per month.

Auryn drifted what’s called an “incline” which is an adit that slopes upwards. “Level 3” is located at about the 1,885 meters above sea level elevation. “Fortuna 1,913 is, of course, located at 1,913 masl. Auryn was able to accomplish this after SERNAGEOMIN (the permitting authority) granted Auryn an “exploration” permit. Now that they’ve “accessed” this ore, they will apply for the “exploitation” permit which allows them to mine the ore.

By drifting this “incline” over 30 vertical meters, Auryn now knows what kind of grades to expect in that vertical stretch in between the 1,919 masl elevation and the 1,885 masl elevation. This is Auryn’s first glimpse of that vertical stretch and the grades and tonnage revealed is fair game for MR/MR calculations.

The granting of this “exploitation” permit will allow the DL2 Vein (Fortuna project) to increase their allowable production rate from 1,000 TPM to 3,000 TPM. This approval is anticipated to land by late 2025 to early 2026. Keep in mind that Auryn is now operating under the Chilean “Small Mineral Producers Statute”. This guarantees not only favorable tax rates but even more importantly STREAMLINED PERMITTING.

Another thing you need to keep in mind is that later in this press release we learned that Auryn already has 28,000 Tonnes stockpiled and ready to be fed into the FF plant as well as over 60,000 Tonnes available to supplement that ore feed. Based on the initial 100 Tonnes per day “nominal throughput rate” for the FF plant, this stockpiled ore should keep the plant busy for 2.4 years. Auryn obviously did a great deal of stockpiling prior to the 1,000 TPM restrictions kicked in on 1/1/24 with the new statute.

We also learned that the approval to mine 1,000 TPM at the Caren Mine is due “at any time”. Management mentioned that once this approval lands, they’re going to immediately file a “follow on application” in order to increase that 1,000 TPM level up to 1,950 TPM at the Caren Mine/Larrissa Adit project. If you’re keeping score, so far we’ve been discussion a total of 4,950 TPM. The breakdown is the original 1,000 TPM already approved for the DL2/”Fortuna” project. Then you need to add 2,000 TPM for the “Fortuna 1,913” project and another 1,950 TPM for the Caren Mine once the “streamlined” permitting lands.

When you factor in the 28,000 tonnes ready to go for the new FF plant, and the over 60,000 tonnes “available to supplement that 28,000 tonnes”, you can see that supplying “feed” for the new plant is pretty well already looked after.

The 100 TPD “nominal throughput rate” translates into 36,000 tonnes per year. The currently stockpiled ore is enough to keep the FF plant busy for 2.44 years not to mention all of the ore being mined as we speak. Keep in mind that the initial 100 TPD “nominal throughput level” is not likely to stay at that level for very long. In a recent update, management cited that they already added to the original order for FF “cells” and “columns”. They did not reveal how much of an increase in the 100 TPD rate that would represent. “Nominal throughput rates” for an FF plant are almost always exceeded in actual mining operations.

Management is going to take the standard approach to commissioning the FF plant. This involves feeding in relatively low-grade ore early on while determining the calibration of the “flow sheet”. Once you learn what the settings are for the “maximum recovery rate”, then you put in the high-grade ore. You don’t want a bunch of gold heading over to the tailings storage facility while you’re figuring out the ideal settings for maximum recovery.

Management mentioned that the “commissioning” process or “dialing-in” process is scheduled to last in between 30 and 45 days. The main warehouse is completely done and they’re actively working on the dry stack tailings storage facility. The remaining approvals for the FF plant and the tailings storage facility are due “in the coming months”.

The new pictures posted on Auryn’s “X” site show a vast number of stockpiles of ore all over the plateau. They have been sorted by “GRADE”. Recall from earlier updates that in between early 2023 and early 2024, Auryn was mining “DIRECTLY FROM THE DL 2 VEIN WITH MINIMAL DILUTION USING PERCUSSION HAMMERS WITHOUT BLASTING”. In their 10/30/24 update, management cited that the ore mined in this fashion would match the grade obtained from the Enami smelter test which came in at 70 gpt “gold equivalent”. They never revealed the exact TONNAGE of the ore mined in this fashion. Based on the details of the offtake agreements, miners will “blend” different grades of ore in order to maximize the financial returns.

The Chilean winter is now over so there should be a period of “clear sailing” for the next 9 months or so from a weather point of view. By far and away the single most important thing to focus in on is that Auryn accomplished all of this with only 70 million shares issued and outstanding.

7 Likes

Uh-huh, and AUMC is up again today to 1.01.

Volume 10,700 sh.

On a fib line drawn back from March, 2022, it’s broken through the .786 line and the 8 line crossed above the 21 back on September 12 - so we’re riding the 8 line now. Low volume for sure, so probably not that worthy, but if you like to be ……. positive ……..

1 Like