Global Health Effects on Markets and Mining Stock

Politicians(not just conservatives), local governments, business are constantly interpreting various CDC guidance in a way that suits their own interests. They choose to be exceptionally optimistic.

Classic example is CDC saying that vaccinated don’t have to wear masks which promoted businesses to allow the vaccinated to not wear masks when inside their premises. Nice but ignores that fact that many nonvaccinated are entering stores without masks and of course nobody is checking or really has the ability to check. Restaurants are also now mostly completely open which is just about the worse place for COVID spread.

Another example is the enormous pressure to reopen schools without most school age children being vaccinated and choosing to ignore the growing threat of the variants which pose to younger people with the most infected age range being 12 to 20 years old where delta variant is present.

1 Like

Several news stories came out about the Delta Plus variant. The Delta variant in India has mutated further into a variant that has to potential to be worse. There is an increased risk that the current RNA vaccines will be rendered ineffective but not enough data yet.

The continued takeaway is that a return to more COVID restrictions is all but evitable. Simply too many cases World-wide allowing for too many opportunities for further mutations.

Chile shutdown as well.

Not only do we have the delta and delta plus variant to worry about, lets please welcome the epsilon and gamma variants! The gamma variant appears to have the highest hospitalization rate associated with it and maybe outcompeting the delta variant.

No comment needed…this graphic says it all.

Mike, do you have any information as to the breakdown of new cases re: fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, 2nd infection (and vaccinated), 2nd infection (never vaccinated), no vaccination or previous infection?

I have seen a few studies but there is no real consensus on what the numbers are. Too many variable involved and the true numbers won’t be available until the smoke clears. Part of the problem is that states provide the feds with variant data that is several weeks old so hard to compare that to current data. There is also a considerable lag time for hospitalizations to happen and deaths to occur.

I do know that fully vaccinated are having no trouble at all in catching the delta variant and spreading it around. It seems that they are much less likely to actually be hospitalized but even that isn’t completely rock solid.

For instance, in the very highly vaccinated country of Israel, 60% of those in the hospital in serious condition have been fully vaccinated. This isn’t exactly a vote of confidence for the vaccines. More than 1,000 Israelis test positive for COVID - Israel News - The Jerusalem Post

Here is another example. In the country of Malta, basically every adult has been vaccinated with the RNA version yet look at the chart. (What isn’t clear is that will the new cases result in excess deaths/hospitalizations which will be obvious in one month.)

Wiz,
Some “numbers” for the Delta strain as recently reported…

Israel National News [reports]> (https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/309762) that this data was presented to the Israeli Health Ministry and yielded the following breakdown of breakthrough infections of those vaccinated vs. those with prior infection:

With a total of 835,792 Israelis known to have recovered from the virus, the 72 instances of reinfection amount to 0.0086% of people who were already infected with COVID.

By contrast, Israelis who were vaccinated were 6.72 times more likely to get infected after the shot than after natural infection, with over 3,000 of the 5,193,499, or 0.0578%, of Israelis who were vaccinated getting infected in the latest wave .”

The Delta variant will likely become the dominant strain in the US, but it is unlikely to have an impact that overwhelms the nation’s hospitalization capacity. Most new cases are well managed therapeutically. The unvaccinated are clearly at the greatest risk. The “numbers” being reported as a percentage misrepresent the actual risk to an individual.

From the CDC:

Reported Cases

The current 7-day moving average of daily new cases (26,306) increased 69.3% compared with the previous 7-day moving average (15,541). The current 7-day moving average is 89.6% lower than the peak observed on January 10, 2021 (251,880) and is 129.3% higher than the lowest value observed on June 20, 2021 (11,472). A total of 33,797,400 COVID-19 cases have been reported as of July 14.

33,797,400
Total Cases Reported

26,306
Current 7-Day Average*

15,541
Prior 7-Day Average

+69.3%
Change in 7-Day Average since Prior Week

What was the original goal of lockdowns? Wasn’t the goal of interventions to prevent overwhelming hospitals with so many patients that care could not be provided? We are well beyond that, but unless we use common sense supported by sound science instead of bureaucratic decision makers we face a real potential for greater harm than from the direct harm inflicted by this virus.

It was recently reported that the median age of death from Covid-19 in the US was 83. Somewhat surprising given the median age at time of death from all causes pre- Covid-19 was 80. Hmmm.

Aside from the Delta and Gamma strains, the military recently (June 25, 2021) reported that of 302,685 total cases of Covid-19, 26 deaths were reported. I would surmise that the survival rate for healthy younger adults is currently very high, and in the military a 99.991% survival from COVID-19 (or a death rate of 0.009%)!

COVID-19 deaths reported in the U.S. as of July 7, 2021, by age

Published by John Elflein, July 14, 2021

Between the beginning of January 2020 and July 7, 2021, of 596,740 deaths caused by COVID-19 in the United States, around 177,322 had occurred among those aged 85 years and older. This statistic shows the number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths in the U.S. from January 2020 to July 2021, by age.

Number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths in the U.S. as of July 7, 2021, by age*

There is a great amount of controversy in the scientific community. Unfortunately there is censoring of some of the most significant information that greatly impacts the young. The facts show the psychological and physical harm from vaccinating and masking children far outweigh the potential benefits.

Just opinion or fact - Time will Tell
Covid Variants will be around seasonally, just like the common cold, for years to come.
This does not mean that testing positive to those who have been vaccinated or those who have natural immunity from having recovered from Covid need some of the extreme measures being contemplated.
It appears that seasonal influenza has more severe effects on children than Covid. Is this a result of T cell long lasting natural immunity? Additionally, adults who have been vaccinated appear to be largely protected from the most severe effects of re-infection. If you are in a risk group and have not been vaccinated it is something that should be considered and largely recommended unless contraindicated.
Below are a couple of excerpts (the articles are long) from some recent articles of interest.

The Flimsy Evidence Behind the CDC’s Push to Vaccinate Children

The agency overcounts Covid hospitalizations and deaths and won’t consider if one shot is sufficient.

By Marty Makary
July 19, 2021 1:52 pm ET

… My research team at Johns Hopkins worked with the nonprofit FAIR Health to analyze approximately 48,000 children under 18 diagnosed with Covid in health-insurance data from April to August 2020. Our report found a mortality rate of zero among children without a pre-existing medical condition such as leukemia. If that trend holds, it has significant implications for healthy kids and whether they need two vaccine doses. The National Education Association has been debating whether to urge schools to require vaccination before returning to school in person. How can they or anyone debate the issue without the right data?

…The CDC’s poor performance isn’t limited to kids or vaccine safety. Early in the pandemic the CDC left us all flying blind by not reporting the medical conditions of those who died of Covid. Collecting the information early would have made it easier to protect nursing-home residents and patients with renal failure or diabetes. It took until March 2021 for the CDC to report that 78% of Covid hospitalizations were among overweight or obese patients.

Most striking, the CDC has never systematically collected and reported the No.1 leading indicator of the pandemic – daily new hospitalizations for Covid sickness. Instead, the CDC offers the lagging indicator of hospitalization for anyone who tests positive for Covid.

No, Delta doesn’t mean the vaccinated — or children — need to mask up again

By Post Editorial Board

July 20, 2021 | 6:43pm

The vaccines almost eliminate the risk of severe illness and death from all variants. Public Health England found that Pfizer’s vaccine is 96 percent effective at preventing hospitalization due to the Delta variant. And the United Kingdom, where Delta surged after being first identified in India, has seen new cases dramatically drop in the last few days, from 54,674 on Saturday to 39,950 on Monday. In Israel, where about 60 percent of people are vaccinated, only 1.6 percent of COVID cases have become critically ill; it was 4 percent before vaccines were available.

Indeed, the data on Delta are “reassuring,” Drs. Leslie Bienen and Monica Gandhi wrote in The Wall Street Journal. Delta cases actually correlated with lower COVID hospitalization rates.

And calling for kids to mask up is ridiculous, Delta or no. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine prof Marty Makary and his research team analyzed childhood COVID cases and found “a mortality rate of zero among children without a pre-existing medical condition such as leukemia.” He notes that an “asymptomatic child who tests positive after being injured in a bicycle accident would be counted” as a COVID hospitalization.

(No, Delta doesn’t mean the vaccinated — or children — need to mask up again)

Pretty much complete nonsense and no wonder…Marty Makary is a Fox News lackey.
One doesn’t have to go any further than understanding the notion the unvaccinated kids remain a very important vector is spreading the virus to unvaccinated/vulnerable adults. This reason alone is enough to call for taking any reasonable measures to protect them from catching/spreading it.

Not to mention that COVID has killed thousands of kids world-wide and startling number of kids are showing signs of Long COVID…up to 30% by some accounts. Long COVID basically translates into brain damage.

And then the author seems to minimize the problem suggesting it is only an issue with high risk kids as if they don’t matter or not worth considering or perhaps they will just die anyway so why bother with them?

FYI…those here note that the current projection is that there will be peak of infections in the U.S. in middle October. It will peak and decline after that as basically every man, women and child in the U.S> will have been exposed the delta variant in one way or another as is so contiguous that it really can’t reasonable be avoided without the complete set of countermeasures like masks, social distancing above and behind what was needed for the Alpha variant.

For those that are still unvaccinated, good luck…

2 Likes

Some people would do better to read what they are opposing before making irrational emotional posts. MG, did you even read the Great Barring Declaration when it came out, or were you one spreading what the propagandists in the mass media were spreading and vehemently opposing it? Most of those opposing it had never even bothered to read it and followed others blindly in opposing it. If it had been followed as an endorsed official policy it would have saved many, many lives. I’ll post it again and you can let everyone know if you still think it is complete nonsense. FYI - There is a great deal of science supporting the role of T cells and long lasting natural immunity gained by previous exposure to Covid and Corona viruses, especially in children’s immune systems. Governmental bureaucrats don’t always get it right and the mass media has censored far too much information that is later shown to be correct.

The Great Barrington Declaration

The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.

Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.

Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.

On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:

Dr. Martin Kulldorff , professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.

Dr. Sunetra Gupta , professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya , professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

SIGN THE DECLARATION

Co-signers

Medical and Public Health Scientists and Medical Practitioners

Dr. Alexander Walker , principal at World Health Information Science Consultants, former Chair of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, USA

Dr. Andrius Kavaliunas , epidemiologist and assistant professor at Karolinska Institute, Sweden

Dr. Angus Dalgleish , oncologist, infectious disease expert and professor, St. George’s Hospital Medical School, University of London, England

Dr. Anthony J Brookes , professor of genetics, University of Leicester, England

Dr. Annie Janvier , professor of pediatrics and clinical ethics, Université de Montréal and Sainte-Justine University Medical Centre, Canada

Dr. Ariel Munitz , professor of clinical microbiology and immunology, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Dr. Boris Kotchoubey , Institute for Medical Psychology, University of Tübingen, Germany

Dr. Cody Meissner , professor of pediatrics, expert on vaccine development, efficacy, and safety. Tufts University School of Medicine, USA

Dr. David Katz , physician and president, True Health Initiative, and founder of the Yale University Prevention Research Center, USA

Dr. David Livermore , microbiologist, infectious disease epidemiologist and professor, University of East Anglia, England

Dr. Eitan Friedman , professor of medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel

Dr. Ellen Townsend , professor of psychology, head of the Self-Harm Research Group, University of Nottingham, England

Dr. Eyal Shahar , physician, epidemiologist and professor (emeritus) of public health, University of Arizona, USA

Dr. Florian Limbourg , physician and hypertension researcher, professor at Hannover Medical School, Germany

Dr. Gabriela Gomes , mathematician studying infectious disease epidemiology, professor, University of Strathclyde, Scotland

Dr. Gerhard Krönke , physician and professor of translational immunology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

Dr. Gesine Weckmann , professor of health education and prevention, Europäische Fachhochschule, Rostock, Germany

Dr. Günter Kampf, associate professor, Institute for Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Greifswald University, Germany

Dr. Helen Colhoun , professor of medical informatics and epidemiology, and public health physician, University of Edinburgh, Scotland

Dr. Jonas Ludvigsson , pediatrician, epidemiologist and professor at Karolinska Institute and senior physician at Örebro University Hospital, Sweden

Dr. Karol Sikora , physician, oncologist, and professor of medicine at the University of Buckingham, England

Dr. Laura Lazzeroni , professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and of biomedical data science, Stanford University Medical School, USA

Dr. Lisa White , professor of modelling and epidemiology, Oxford University, England

Dr. Mario Recker , malaria researcher and associate professor, University of Exeter, England

Dr. Matthew Ratcliffe , professor of philosophy, specializing in philosophy of mental health, University of York, England

Dr. Matthew Strauss , critical care physician and assistant professor of medicine, Queen’s University, Canada

Dr. Michael Jackson , research fellow, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

Dr. Michael Levitt , biophysicist and professor of structural biology, Stanford University, USA.
Recipient of the 2013 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

Dr. Mike Hulme , professor of human geography, University of Cambridge, England

Dr. Motti Gerlic , professor of clinical microbiology and immunology, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Dr. Partha P. Majumder , professor and founder of the National Institute of Biomedical Genomics, Kalyani, India

Dr. Paul McKeigue , physician, disease modeler and professor of epidemiology and public health, University of Edinburgh, Scotland

Dr. Rajiv Bhatia , physician, epidemiologist and public policy expert at the Veterans Administration, USA

Dr. Rodney Sturdivant , infectious disease scientist and associate professor of biostatistics, Baylor University, USA

Dr. Salmaan Keshavjee , professor of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School, USA

Dr. Simon Thornley , epidemiologist and biostatistician, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Dr. Simon Wood , biostatistician and professor, University of Edinburgh, Scotland

Dr. Stephen Bremner ,professor of medical statistics, University of Sussex, England

Dr. Sylvia Fogel , autism provider and psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital and instructor at Harvard Medical School, USA

Tom Nicholson , Associate in Research, Duke Center for International Development, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, USA

Dr. Udi Qimron , professor of clinical microbiology and immunology, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Dr. Ulrike Kämmerer , professor and expert in virology, immunology and cell biology, University of Würzburg, Germany

Dr. Uri Gavish , biomedical consultant, Israel

Dr. Yaz Gulnur Muradoglu , professor of finance, director of the Behavioural Finance Working Group, Queen Mary University of London, England

Selected Information from CDC for review that I found useful in drawing some of my conclusions and opinions are shown below in graphical form. Others are welcome to draw their own conclusions from all available information. There is no validity to any science without weighing and comparing all available information, including opposing scientific views:

From the above information it is clear to me that severity of Covid-19, not necessarily the incidence, is largely decreasing for a number of reasons. From the last chart above, it is clear that Obesity, Hypertension and Metabolic Disease (i.e. Diabetes) are the main factors contributing to negative outcomes from contracting Covid-19. The risk from the vaccine is minimal compared to the risk of the disease to individuals that have any one or more of the risk factors shown in the graph above. The 1st graph shows that once vaccines were widely available, hospitalizations from those with Covid-19 on board diminished dramatically. The middle graph shows that deaths have stabilized for the most severely affected.

The unmasked, unvaccinated children in the U.S are now the latest victims of COVID. See hospitalization chart below:

So Mike,
What are you trying to show on your graph here? I see it and interpret that less than one child under 17 in 300,000 is hospitalized. Is this from the start of covid, last week, yesterday or what? More context would be helpful. Are these children also being treated for leukemia or some other serious disease? It is completely out of context and meant to scare. Since the experimental emergency use vaccines are for adults I’ll assume you’re advocating masks. What are masks useful for when it comes to aerosolized airborne viruses? There are hundreds of scientific articles that say they are not useful. Because the aerosolized viruses are so small they pass easily through cloth and surgical masks. The analogy is made "it’s like putting up a chainlink fence around your yard to keep the mosquitoes out!"

1 Like

This article is worth reading about Florida’s governor:

Writer: Michael Harriot

I think we can all agree that Ron DeSantis doesn’t care if his constituents die.

That is not an opinion; it is a conclusion. If you and Ron DeSantis were walking in a rainstorm and he intentionally knocked your umbrella to the ground, you should assume he doesn’t care if you get wet. If you were in a house that was on fire and discovered that DeSantis had nailed all the doors shut, it is reasonable to believe Ron DeSantis wants you to burn. But, to be fair, none of these examples are analogous to what Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is doing to Floridians.

Ron DeSantis isn’t just refusing to protect the citizens of Florida from a deadly pandemic, he is spitting on them during a rainstorm. He is dousing their burning homes with gasoline, and he is currently in charge of the worst COVID outbreak in the country.

Ron DeSantis is not good at his job.

The only way any reasonable person could conclude that DeSantis was an even remotely competent governor was if his goal was to kill people.

According to the New York Times’ COVID tracker, the Sunshine State currently has more new COVID cases, more hospitalizations per day and more deaths per day than any other state or territory in the nation. Since DeSantis became governor, the coronavirus has affected more lives than all of the crimes in the state combined. While Gov. DeStupidest has seen the murder rate rise 14 percent since he took office, COVID has killed 19 times more Floridians than all of the murderers in the state.

To curb this virus-on-human violence, DeSantis has enacted a number of measures that defy all logic. He pushed misinformation by informing residents that COVID-19 was no worse than the flu. As schools around the state prepare to open, he threatened to pull funding from school districts and school superintendents who support mask mandates. Of course, schools could just ameliorate the impact of children catching COVID by implementing distance learning, But Gov. DeSimpleton banned them from doing so. Then he offered to give taxpayer money to private schools if parents wanted to send their children to schools that rejected CDC protocols.

Or maybe he hasn’t been filled in on all this COVID nonsense. When reporters asked why the federal government had to pitch in and offer medical equipment to the state’s overflowing hospitals, DeSantis claimed he had no idea what they were talking about. Apparently, he had no idea that healthcare workers were in desperate need of the specific type of devices the DeSantis administration refers to as “stuff.”

CNN reports:

A health administration official confirms the Strategic National Stockpile sent 200 ventilators and 100 high-flow nasal cannula kits to the state of Florida “earlier this week.” The SNS sends equipment when it receives requests from states and their health departments, according to the official.

Despite that, DeSantis told reporters Tuesday that he was unaware of the request for the medical supplies.

“I would honestly doubt that that’s true, but I’ll look because we have a lot of stuff that we stockpiled over the last year and a half through the Department of Emergency Management,” DeSantis said when asked by a reporter about a request from the state for the additional supplies.

Of course, the COVID King claims he is just looking out for the liberty and freedom of his constituents. However, the ones who have managed to keep themselves alive despite his every effort to expedite their deaths have given him a 49 percent negative approval rating, according to a recent poll. Only 51 percent of white Floridians gave him a positive mark in the survey while the governor was below 50 percent among Black, Asian and Hispanic voters.

Even worse, the same poll shows that voters would rather elect Democratic Rep. Charlie Crist (D-Fla.) than Gov. DeSuperspreader to serve as the next governor of the state. In 2018, DeSantis squeaked by Democratic gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum by 32,463 votes—less than half of one percent of people who voted in the statewide election. But more than 40,167 of Floridians have since died from COVID, more than 99 percent of whom were over the age of 18. Eighty-one percent of Florida’s COVID deaths are over the age of 65 and 51 percent were white, the two strongest constituencies among DeSantis voters, according to Associated Press VoteCast exit polling.

DeVirus voters are literally dying faster than everyone else!

DeSantis’ actions defy all political, scientific or medical logic. So why would he repeatedly push his pro-virus position on his residents? Whose side is he on? There’s only one logical answer to this question. But instead of telling you what you already know, I’d rather offer a bit of sage advice to the Floridians who are stuck in Ron’s DeSunken Place.

Get.

Out.

If only the mass media would start getting all available information presented in order to weigh opposing facts … then maybe some sanity could return to this country. Censorship is destroying what should be common sense!

For a full year, our children never saw one another’s faces. They didn’t see their teachers or their playmates. They were cut off. They were masked. Masks were mandatory in schools and in most public places. Masks were the key to fighting the great global pandemic, they told us again and again. Our public health authorities repeated that every day. So our children complied with it. They had no choice. Very few of their parents questioned it. Adults who refused to wear masks in public were arrested for it. And that sent the clearest possible message. Shut up and do what you’re told. So people did.

And yet, bubbling beneath the surface, questions remain. They didn’t go away. Questions like, do masks really keep us safe from COVID-19? What is the downside of wearing masks? There’s got to be a downside. What is it? And above all, why make children wear masks? What’s the point of that? We’ve known since the beginning that children aren’t at significant risk from the coronavirus, nor are they meaningful vectors for spreading it. As The Lancet put it famously last fall, “COVID-19 is a generally mild disease in children, including infants.” And they’re right. More kids die in pool drownings every year than have died from COVID so far, according to the latest federal numbers, just .06% of all COVID fatalities in this country have been Americans aged 18 and under. So why mandate masks in schools? Well, because the teachers’ unions demanded it. But beyond that, very few people asked, instead, we were treated to a daily, incessant drumbeat from the media, wear a mask, wear a mask, wear a mask. All good people wear masks.

JAKE TAPPER: The American Academy of Pediatrics just told CNN that children under the age of 12 should be the ones who wear masks. Do you agree?

CNN GUEST: Yeah, especially if they’re indoors, indoor settings bring them into stores or restaurants.

CNN GUEST: Those kids obviously need to keep masks on when they’re in public places, particularly when they’re indoors, in public places, to…

MSNBC GUEST: Think about the indoors as a risky environment. In fact, if you’re going indoors with children and they’re in a setting where they don’t have knowledge of who’s vaccinated and who’s not like other kids in camps, you should have them wear masks. And I’ve found that kids are actually OK with wearing masks.

“I found that actually, kids are OK with wearing masks,” says someone identifying as a physician. in the end, that was the level of science behind this policy. Kids are easy to command. They don’t know any better. You can make them do anything. And so we did.

MEDIA SOUNDS ALARM ON DELTA VARIANT DESPITE LARGELY EFFECTIVE COVID VACCINES

They had no idea what they were talking about. There was no science behind what they said, they were just guessing and acting like it was settled, but it wasn’t. We know that now because the actual science is finally coming in. Our juvenile mask policy, the one imposed on the entire country by the teachers’ unions and their puppets in Washington, turns out to be a complete disaster.

It was a human tragedy, in fact, on a vast scale, and it is a living testament to the recklessness of our leaders. A new study on masks and children has been conducted by actual researchers in Germany and Poland, and it was just published in JAMA Pediatrics, the premier peer-reviewed pediatric medical journal in the world. That study confirms that masking children wasn’t simply unnecessary and probably counterproductive. Masking children was legitimately dangerous for the children.

In the study, researchers asked forty-five kids between the ages of six and 17 to wear face masks for a very short period of time in a controlled environment. Within just three minutes, they found that kids were inhaling carbon dioxide up to more than six times the acceptable limit for adults. The younger the children, the higher the concentration of carbon

Almost immediately after putting a mask on a seven-year-old, that kid’s carbon dioxide level was 25,000 parts per million. How much is that? Well, it’s more than twice the level considered hazardous for adults in workplaces in this country.

For example, the Minnesota Department of Health post this guideline, “The average concentration of carbon dioxide over an eight hour period should not exceed 10,000 parts per million.”

That kid had 25,000 parts per million, and keep in mind, the guidance is for an eight-hour period. This study found far higher concentrations in just minutes after putting on a mask. Imagine a full school day and what it would do to a child. How about a full year of full school days? Think about that. It’s horrifying.

And the effects are measurable and have been for a while. But they’ve been ignored. One large-scale survey of 25,000 children conducted in Germany found the overwhelming majority of kids reported adverse effects from wearing face masks, some of them were serious. The effects included Hyper Calpurnia, which is excessive C02 in the bloodstream. That’s not surprising.

And then many of the symptoms included profound cognitive impairment, confusion, loss of consciousness, and asphyxiation. Now, these studies shouldn’t actually surprise us, our public health officials knew from the beginning that forcing children to wear masks could be counterproductive. In fact, they knew that masks themselves can spread disease because it had been demonstrated by the largest study of the use of surgical masks back in 2015. It was conducted by researchers in Vietnam and it proved that.

“A trial we conducted in Vietnam of two-layered cotton cloth masks compared to medical masks should be 13 times higher risk of infection in the cloth mask. The study suggests that cloth masks may increase the risk of infection.”

1 Like

Thank all for the information on this mess the world is in now.
I for one, like to read articles without the sarcasm and blame game approach in them.
We already have enough of that in the world
No-one wins when reading those.
It wouldn’t hurt to go by the old saying:;
" If you don’t have anything good to say; then don’t say it"
Modified in this case. If you can’t get your point across without sarcasm or blame… Then you should rethink it maybe…??? Good luck to us all.

" If you don’t have anything good to say; then don’t say it"… or post it.

Quoted below is not exactly an article, will a transcript suffice?
Some people have learned to read, and unfortunately the focus in education today has not been on teaching the basics of math, science, english and literature to K-12 students. Basic skills are needed in adulthood for critical thought processes such as “common sense”. This is, at least in part, a direct result of this pandemic. Science notes that those individuals in K-12 age group suffer the fewest severe effects from Covid-19. That is what the science says, contrary to what the teacher’s unions or CDC policy recommendations advocate. Recently, one parent had voiced his opposition to the local school board in a clear, coherent manner. Unfortunately, when his youtube went viral it was removed. Shown below is most of what he had to say in his short 6 minute presentation, all without any notes.

One very important point he mentioned only in passing is ** antibody mediated viral enhancement,** ( or commonly referred to as ADE - Antibody Dependent Enhancement) a response specifically caused by mRNA vaccines that makes reinfections so transmissible. Fortunately, reinfections do not seem to be as virulent, and individuals are routinely treated with therapeutics outside of hospitalization. Dr. Stock’s impassioned speech is worth reading and considering as many physicians are speaking out with similar new information, only to be silenced by the algos running big tech. All too many of them are not only being censored, but also ruined professionally by the cancel culture warriors prevalent in today’s society. Is this an effect of the pandemic, or something else?

Dr Dan Stock
August 7,2021

The address you’re about to see is hard to believe 18 months into this and still having a problem. And I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is because we’re doing things that are not useful and we’re getting our sources of information from the Indiana State board of Health and the CDC who actually don’t bother to read science before they do this.

I’m actually a functional family medicine physician. That means I am speciality trained in immunology and inflammation, regulation.

And everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is actually contrary to all the rules of science.

So things you should know about coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses, they are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask.

By the way, the literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we presented to you. It’s been given to the secretary.

As a matter of fact, it quotes at least three studies sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact even though the CDC in the NIH have chosen to ignore the very science that they paid to have done. That is why you keep struggling with this because you cannot make these viruses go away. The Natural History of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter or become deranged as has happened recently with these vaccines. And then they cause symptomatic disease. Because they cannot be filtered out, and they have animal reservoirs.

And this is a very important point. No one can make this virus go away. The CDC has managed to convince everybody we can handle this like we did smallpox where we could make the virus go away. Smallpox had no animal reservoirs. The only thing it learned to infect was humans. That’s why we were able to make that virus go away. That will not happen with this anymore than it will with influenza, the common cold, or respiratory syncytial viruses or anything else that has animal reservoirs. So, the reason you can’t do this is because you’re trying to do something which has already been tried and can’t be done.

Equally important is that vaccination changes none of this, especially with this vaccine. And I hope this board would start asking itself before it considers taking the advice of the CDC, NIH and the State Board of Health why we’re doing things about this that we didn’t do for the common cold, influenza, or respiratory syncytial virus.

And then ask yourself why is a vaccine that is supposedly so effective having a breakdown in the middle of the summer and respiratory viral syndromes don’t do that?

And to help you understand that you need to know the condition that is called antibody mediated viral enhancement. That is a condition done when vaccines work wrong, as they did in every coronavirus study done in animals on coronavirus after the SARS outbreak and done in respiratory syncytial virus where a vaccine used in a vulnerable individual done the wrong way, which why it cannot be done right for respiratory virus, which has a very low pathogenicity rate, causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong and let the virus become worse than it would with native infection.

And that is why you’re seeing an outbreak right now. In fact, in that flash drive you’re going to have coming to you in an email with six extra studies showing that 75% of people who had COVID-19 positive symptom cases in Barnstable MA outbreak were fully vaccinated.

Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person vaccinated any differently than any person unvaccinated. You should also know that no vaccine, even the ones I support and would give to myself and my children, ever stops infection.

In 2014, there was outbreak of mumps in the National Hockey League. The only people who came down the symptoms were the people who were unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status. Boy, that sounds like a great argument for vaccines, but a question that you should ask yourself, knowing that half of the people who came down with symptomatic disease had no contact with an unvaccinated or unknown vaccine status individual, where did they get the disease?

And the answer was “ from the vaccinated individuals.” No vaccine prevents you from getting infection. You get infected, you shed pathogen. This is especially true of viral respiratory pathogens. You just don’t get symptomatic from it.

So you cannot stop spread. You cannot make these numbers that you’ve planned on get better by doing any of the things you’re doing, because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens.

And you can’t prevent it with a vaccine because they don’t do the very thing you’re wanting them to do.

And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognize that the Center for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you very bad scientific guidance. And instead read the articles that are coming in the email and on this flash drive and listen to the people in this audience here tonight who actually have recognized the advice they are getting from the CDC and the NIH is counterfactual.

And that’s why you’re still fighting this with this vaccine that supposedly was going to make all of this go away. But it suddenly managed to make an outbreak of covid-19 develop in the middle of the summer when vitamin D levels are at their highest.

By the way, the other thing that would be necessary, any vaccine restriction to be considered is if there were no other treatment available. And I can tell you, having treated over 15 covid-19 patients, that between active loading with vitamin D, ivermectin and zinc, that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near the hospital.

And we already have studies that show that if you achieve a 25 hydroxy vitamin D level greater than fifty five, your risk of covid-19 death will drop down to one quarter of the population average for the United States.

And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that the show the same is true. So if you were going to discriminate based upon vaccine, you should also discriminate based upon 25 hydroxy vitamin D level, zinc taste test response, and probably previous infections.

Since there are also studies like Flash Drive that show that people who have recovered from covid-19 infection actually get no benefit from vaccination at all, no reduction in symptoms, no reduction in hospitalization and suffer two to four times the rate of side effects if they are subsequently vaccinated.
Therefore, the policies that you are basing on are totally counterfactual.

(Apologies - spell checker kicked in and rewrote - had to go back and correct. Did I mention there is a danger in AI?) :dizzy_face: :upside_down_face: