4 full months until the shareholders meeting. More than enough time and intelligent investors here to put together a game plan in regards to proxy voting and a restructuring of the BOD and other things that should be discussed. I’m suggesting selecting certain prominent members here to collaborate on these and other issues. It’s time for us to be proactive and have one voice.
6 Likes
I agree.
Anyone know how we shareholders overcome the CDC issuing a blanket certificate for street shares to the MDMN BOD.
I think we have an idea how they would be voted by the current BOD.
Without taking anything away from CHG, if we strictly look at “extensive mining experience” I believe Doc and the MG persona should be also included in the commentary because they pass the test with flying colors.
Of course MG is too busy chasing tornadoes and I would exclude him. 
This leaves Doc. His knowledge on mining in general and particularly on our mountain is unparalleled!
Then of course he also has a profession to attend and a few issues with one or two other members on this tread…
Maybe the best possible combination would be Baldy and Doc together…
1 Like
Calling Katniss! LOL
If everyone can hold off on public discussion of this for a little while longer that would be great.
1 Like
Ha. Thanks but no thanks. The unfortunate legalties, if one were to actual follow them, as a director would be all of my shares becoming restricted. We truly need an independent, and grounded, director who has actual experience running a company/holding company.
The reality is that we don’t actually need mining experience if the role is limited to monitoring our 25% of AMC and controlling costs while we wait for distributions and/or an exit. Unless the intention is to pursue new mining properties, which I assume the majority of us don’t want, what is the point of requiring a mining background in a directors resume? Vital and Gary’s track record in “mining” is abysmal. Get rid of them and add one guy to see this investment through the exit. That would be the proxy I would be looking to vote for.
7 Likes
Working on it . . .
7 Likes
God Speed on that mission.
4 Likes
LOL - now you’re trying to overhaul the whole culture of the Company.
2 Likes
Sorry to bring up an old and over discussed topic . But with the recent enthusiasm over Auryn’s expertise impact on MDMN/CDCH’ future, can we expect the shorts to start covering before the SP starts to reflect this enthusiasm? The shorts must be recognizing that the ducks are finally being lined up for this junior mining play.
Comments?
Put it to rest! No relevance to future share price considerations:
(click on my icon above quote to see my explanation)
Majority opinion of what it will take to move PPS upwards is in a poll:
1 Like
Thanks easy, your response and sharing past info/your past posts on this topic much appreciated. I was not aware that this was put to bed.
I assume this meeting will not (?) require metal detectors or bouncers. The Auryn presentation should be quite the contrast to past agm’s and reflect reality, not done, done, done… Without transparency and representation
how could they even think of getting in a room with us?
Anyone want to take a crack at why they think our share price went down this week…
Tapped out shareholder base, no institutional promotion …
No production report for 5 months, right about in time for SHM and presentation in Las Vegas.
2 Likes
I hope we are not trading below .02 for the next four months…
This is the real deal if you have extra cash to spare put it on Auryn/Masglas I guarantee you will not be disappointed come AGM. After all Auryn/ Masglas own over 400 million shares😃 Not pumping just stating the facts.
1 Like