Auryn/Medinah 2025 2nd half General Discussion

GC, understood, but it would be nice if they could at least give us a heads up that they have been hitting their targets. They don’t have to issue a formal quarterly update, even just a post on social media or a press release, as they have done before, showing work progressing.

My concern about the regular silence goes to the fact that if good news exists why not let everyone know?

In their 1st qtr update they indicated they expected plant to start operations for testing and configuration purposes in early 3rd qtr, with anticipated authorization to commence full production in late 3rd qtr of this year. Then this got pushed back in the 2nd qtr update to the end of the year. We got a pics of the site on social media, but it didn’t have any plant on it. We are now 2/3rd’s of the way through the 3rd qtr and we don’t even know if the plant has been received or installed, let alone ready to go for testing, calibration, or production.

If things have progressed, give us some pics. Let’s us know the plant sits assembled on site. Let us know the plant doesn’t sit in boxes in somewhere. Let us know something. Unfortunately, they last posted on X that the plant sat in Santiago’s port in April and they were going to transport to the mountain the following week. It’s now the end of Aug and no further posts. Why?

When you set a goal and can’t meet it, you notify, explain why, and reset the timeline. Like they did in between the 1st qtr and 2nd qtr updates. Everyone can then reset. The continued silence, however, doesn’t create any positive feelings, especially due to Auryn’s past history.

Also is anyone else having trouble accessing Auryn’s website? I can’t access it today.

1 Like

I cant access it either. Must be down. Update maybe?

I haven’t been able to access it since Saturday.

This is still an OTC stock for now. According to the last update, I recall the FF was being installed at that moment in time. Now they’re adjusting & testing the FF this quarter with the stockpiles. I can’t find the JULY 2025 UPDATE directly with the website down, but I believe they outlined their plan well. Look for 4th QTR production (1,000 tons per month), as stated.

1 Like

I’m not saying they haven’t set forth a plan, but, unfortunately, they keep making statements, changing the goal posts, and not providing anything else to show any progress. Why haven’t they posted any social media pics or otherwise since April?

They were so quick to post on social media about the plant, and the site preparation, and the new building, and the tunnels late last year and into this year, when progress actually occurred; but, now when it’s time to actually move forward and produce, we get nothing. Why? Does their failure to provide anything mean no progress has occurred since April? Their last post on April 17 says the plant was going to get shipped to the mountain the following week. It’s the end of August and we have nothing more. Again, why?

The failure to show progress fits an unfortunate pattern.

1 Like

More detailed info would be great, but we’re not being cheated. And we’ve also been informed of more progress since April. Perhaps AUMC is playing their cards close to the chest for strategic reasons. Consider that AUMC currently has activity on other AUMC claims on that mountain. And the differences between the OTC & NYSE markets also affect the level of transparency & reporting.

The NYSE is centralized with strict listing requirements. Those securities generally boast higher liquidity and transparency. The expectations you describe would most likely be honored in those stocks, too.

The OTC Markets are less regulated and have more relaxed listing requirements; and they often have much higher risk/reward potentials. AUMC may not be required to honor your higher expectations, but we’ve still been informed.

Fortunately for us, MC has provided better communications from AUMC than many other OTC securities. Auryn appears to be on track since the July update. The 4th QTR doesn’t even begin until October. Personally, If AUMC isn’t producing 1,000 tons/month by Xmas, then that’s when I would be concerned.

4 Likes

That’s because they want to revamp the website to include the FF plant, stockpiles of ore, expected date of first shipped concentrate AND the date when the AURYN shares will be given to the Medinah shareholders. :wink:

4 Likes

The Auryn website is back up and running. It just needed to be re-booted. I’m going to guess by Kevin.

3 Likes

Just continuing my due diligence on Auryn (as I do on all investments), and downloaded Auryn’s last financials posted in Aug for the end of the 2nd qtr 2025. See attached. Hasn’t really changed much from prior disclosures, other than expenses increasing as set forth in the notes

Auryn 2nd Qtr 2025.pdf (432.9 KB)

There has been regular discussions on this board RE Auryn’s profitability, shareholder’s value, dividends, etc. I want to reference certain items in the financials. These items aren’t new, they have appeared in prior financial disclosures, but I want to highlight them to put Auryn’s status into context as it relates to what you actually hold as an Auryn/MDMN stockholder.

Look at the Note 2, bottom of subpart Revenue Recognition, Auryn generated no income in 2024 and no income through the end of the 2nd qtr 2025. This is not the first time this has appeared. Auryn does not generate any revenue what-so-ever. All they have are expenses. (Now you might say they don’t have expense because they haven’t listed any; however, they do, see Note 4 below). As an Auryn stockholder, you own stock in a company that does not generate any revenue. None. IMO, don’t expect Auryn to be paying out to stockholder’s any dividends anytime soon until they start generating revenue, which mining hasn’t even commenced yet, and get their balance sheet in order. IMO, this is a couple years down the road at the earliest.

Look at Note 4, first paragraph I believe shows MC’s loans to the company. Nothing really new. It states these debts are due upon demand (which we already knew). Now don’t you think that if Auryn start generating gross revenue MC will make a demand to pay his debts first? IMO, he does. So any revenue generate goes to MC. Auryn still has to operate the mine, so even using the best case scenario’s set forth on this board, you still have to exclude operating expenses and the expenses to Ameco, which means Auryn’s net income will be substantially lower (if any) in the first years of operation. IMO Auryn won’t have the net income to distribute to stockholders anytime soon.

Next, the second paragraph has the more interesting statements. These statements are not new, the prior financial disclosures have them. States that Auryn holds an option contract with another company, although not named, (speculating its the recent agreement with Ameco Chile). This agreement states the other company incurs all expenses to exploit the property, and the other company will get paid from the ore mined; however, the key part states the other company gets paid back FIRST before Auryn sees any money from the mined ore. Then they state the other company has already incurred $10M in expenses (the amount has been steadily increasing from prior disclosures). Therefore, even using the best case scenario gross revenue calculations from those on this board, it’s going to take more than a few years to pay back this other company before Auryn sees a dime. Remember, the expenses incurred by this other company do not relate the expenses necessary to operate and exploit the mine to remove the ore to generate revenue, nor the costs of smelting the ore to a saleable grade. Those operating expenses will occur in addition to the expenses already incurred as stated in the $10M. IMO, Auryn will not have any net income available for at least 5+ years with the operating/smelting expenses and the $10M in expenses already in place.

Because no one has seen a copy of the Ameco agreement, I can’t say for 100% this $10M fits within it. If it doesn’t Auryn is in a world of hurt as the incurred an additional $10M upon the $20M it will owe to Ameco. But I believe it does, so, then Ameco has already expended 50% of the allotted $20M within the agreement. Don’t know if they would need an expansion of the agreement because spending 50% of the expenses in the first year of the five year agreement doesn’t bode well for the expenses associated with bringing this mine to life for Auryn. Let’s say they don’t need more funds. In this scenario, you are looking at having to pay back $20M from the mined ore, plus continue to pay all of the mine operating expenses, plus the costs of smelting before Auryn see one dime of money. Coupled with the fact, as I posted above, as we really don’t know the progress on the mountain, it could still be another year or more before the first processed ore actually gets sold. IMO you are now looking at 10 years before Auryn receives any net income.

As an Auryn/MDMN stockholder, you need to know what you have. Currently, you have a company generating no gross revenue, let alone net income, which will have to pay, most likely, $20M+ of expenses on top of its regular expenses necessary to exploit the mine. IMO I can see Auryn having a balanced balance sheet, but I don’t see any large net income being generated and I wouldn’t be holding my breath for the payment of any dividends for years and years.

Lastly, for everyone who has made statements about MC’s philanthropic nature towards shareholders because he owns shares himself, please read Note 5 and tell me what it means. Doesn’t state a very uplifting an positive picture does it? In particular it states Auryn plans to sell its equity securities and secure debt financing to fund its capital requirement. IMO, looks like dilution to me. To those of you who state no dilution will occur, how to you interpret this statement? IMO, since Auryn needs to dillute to keep funding operations any value you have in Auryn/MDMN shares will go down. They have specifically stated its their plan to do so.

If have said it many times before, as a stockholder, you need to look to what Auryn puts down in writing, not speculating on what you think you know. IMO, as stated before by another member of this board, Auryn is on the track to potentially become a mining company, if the quality of the mine really exists and Auryn is taking the steps to get to an operating, profitable mine; however, IMO, this journey is going to take in excess of 10+ years and the value of what you hold right now will get diluted. I really, really hope I am wrong in my analysis and Auryn hits bonanza grades, no dilution occurs, and unicorns and rainbows appear, but I don’t see it. My analysis does not mean that Auryn won’t succeed, just that it won’t succeed in any reasonable amount of time to return any value to stockholders.

IMO, because my Auryn/MDMN holdings are at such a loss (effectively zero), Auryn/MDMN acts as nothing but a loss to offset any capital gains I make from another stock sale. I have only and will continue to only sell when I need to offest any gains. I’m not holding because I want to hold it, but because I’m not going to throw away the tax benefit. I will continue to monitor Auryn/MDMN periodically, and I really hope I am wrong and Auryn goes green really soon.

Hope everyone enjoys the extended weekend!

Respectfully, I suppose that’s one way to spin it. Past posts reveal your long-term skepticism of Auryn. You’ve a right to your opinions. But it helps to assimilate the commentary of other knowledgeable ppl on this forum too; like brecciaboy, easymillion, and a few others here — not to mention the importance of the quarterly Updates and evidence of Auryn’s progress provided, including gallery photos.

I do not see much reflection of those details in your past few posts. This latest post doesn’t seem to be taking in the whole picture & other claims. You seem to doubt that production is about to commence, which I find odd. Regardless, you are entitled to your views. These are just my comments based on those posts. The fine details of the finances haven’t yet been disclosed, but I’m confident in Auryn’s management & connections in the mining industry. Timing is imperative. Hopefully this latest update will prove to be accurate to the EOY. I wish you well in your future decisions. :peace_symbol:

3 Likes

I would like to see the Ameco agreement. But most of all they, AURYN, should disclose ANY ties, holdings, affiliations, with those companies. I smell a RAT. $20 Million for what exactly ???
I’ve been in the mining sector for over 40 years, NEVER heard of such a ‘deal’, without disclosing what the $20 Million is specifically benefiting AUMC. That is a lot of money.

$20 Million could have been used for drilling, sampling, SO many things to lead them to a 401, &/or PE, PFS, PF. IMO this is becoming a joke. So many companies go out of their way to inform their share holders what is happening, step by step. Look at New Found Gold, and many others …

NOT IMPRESSED with AURYN. at all ….

PS : was actually going to buy some (more) stock, since there are so many willing to raise the price once ‘good news’ comes out, but to me this stock is ***** all talk, VERY little positive action except for ** it’s benefit !

[/quote]

1 Like

Spin it? I gave you Auryn’s exact words as set forth in their financials filed with the SEC. No spin exists. Auryn must pay back the other company (most likely Ameco) first before it sees a dime of income, and Ameco has already spent $10M of the $20M. Auryn has not earned any income and doesn’t see itself earning income. Auryn will sell shares and take on debt financing to funds its obligations to keep mining. Those are statements made to the SEC as accurate by Auryn. I didn’t reflect on past statements from other stockholders or anyone else’s statements, as they are just opinion. Anyone else can say what they want, but Auryn controls what it says. And I am showing everyone what Auryn has said. I am only pointing these facts out to those stockholders who keep trying to spin Auryn into an ATM in the near future. Know what you own.

I have never stated that Auryn will not commence production. I have only questioned when the production will commence. IMO it runs hot and cold from Auryn. We get shareholder updates and social media posts showing activity, making statements that items will get delivered to the mountain, and production is starting soon; but then we get social media silence for months, extensions of previously set timelines. Why? What’s actually happening? No one really knows. The fact no one actually knows goes to the heart of my concern. It’s not about doubting production, it’s about keeping the stockholders informed of when.

If I am spinning it, where do you see in Auryn’s written statements and financials when Auryn will earn any net income in the near future? The financials clearly state that Auryn earns no income, doesn’t expect to earn income, has to pay back the other company (Ameco) before it sees a dime, and will sell shares and take on debt financing to pay its financial obligations to mine. Please point to Auryn’s written statements which state otherwise. Again, I’d be very happy to be wrong as I still have a boatload of shares, but I don’t see where they will earn any net income anytime soon.

TheRod, I understand your frustration regarding details, I share many of the same frustrations. I don’t feel, however, that MC is trying to actively line his own pockets as the expense of other shareholders. We have already been fleeced due to the actions of others in the past. There is nothing left to take. How much lower can the stock go? I do believe MC is working to right the ship and has a path to do so; however, IMO, the path is a long and expensive one. Will Auryn eventually get there, maybe, probably. Will shareholders reap the rewards soon for MC’s hard work in righting the ship. IMO, no. IMO, if you are willing to hold on to your shares for another 10 years, you may see a reward.

“I have only and will continue to only sell when I need to offest any gains.”

Some unofficial tax advice: You don’t have to wait for a gain to take your tax loss! It will be waiting for you when you actually have a gain down the road.

I would suggest you get out now and take your loss or you may wait too long and actually end up with a gain instead.

It’s a win/win. You get out of the stock you despise, and you get your tax loss.

1 Like

Can we get this straight:

  • Theres the financing

  • The MC loan

  • And the $20M option

    Whats the tally right now for each? The F/S are clear as mud.

Yes, you quoted the SEC financials, and I understand your valid concerns with specific details yet unknown. I only offer that you balance those concerns with the facts we do know. Auryn has given us good information thus far, albeit some details remain somewhat vague. Could be timing or other strategy, we don’t yet know.

”Spin it?” I was referring to the several comments that you offered as possible outcomes ‘in your opinion’. Some of them seemed a bit assumptive in mine. Those are debatable gray areas. And some of those predictions ignore the July 2025 update. From your post, I didn’t see any references regarding the other claims they are simultaneously working on, either.

If the FF is at or near completion, production is imminent — as stated in the update. Will they be producing 3K oz before Jan 2026 as claimed? Time will tell. Additionally, with gold at $3.4K per oz and still climbing, I cannot comprehend some of the doomsday scenarios sometimes presented here.

Others here have unmatched & extensive knowledge regarding multiple aspects of mining. Their knowledge is based on factual data, not only educated opinions. From my perspective, the entire picture is far superior to limited views.:peace_symbol:

Hi JimmyP,

THE FINANCING: The terms of the financing are: a $4 million debt financing, the interest rate is SOFR (Secured Overnight Financing Rate) plus 4% (a little over 8% today but keep in mind that the Fed is hinting at starting to cut rates in as early as 17 days), 5-year (60-month) term, no payments due for first 10-months, equal monthly payments due over the next 50 months after the 10-month grace period.

The funder goes by the name “Strategic Investments, SAC”. You might think of them as “SISAC”. MOST IMPORTANTLY: They are an “affiliate” of “The Ashmore Group/Stracon/Ameco, SA” which is our “mine operator”. Did the funders say: if you hire us as your “mine operator” (instead of one of our competitors), we’ll loan you $4 million under great terms? I couldn’t tell you. What I can tell you is that of the 3,000 other junior miners out there currently, most of which couldn’t even dream of landing a debt financing like this, about 2,999 wish they were in Auryn’s shoes.

MAURIZIO’S CASH ADVANCES: Maurizio has advanced $10.3 million to date (as per the Q-2, 2025 financials). There are no interest charges (zero cost of capital), no payments need to be made until after production commences and Auryn can comfortably afford to pay him back but only after Maurizio asks to be repaid.

The question you should be asking is this: did Maurizio have to, or voluntarily agree to, “subordinate” his debt behind that of SISAC. The answer is “yes”. Think about it, the financiers are sitting at the negotiating table with Maurizio. They have a check for $4 million in hand, but they know that Maurizio is owed $10 million. What if Auryn had $10 million in the treasury and Maurizio decided, as CEO, to pay himself off and tell the financiers to go pound sand?

The financiers need to protect themselves against something like this. What usually happens in a situation like this is Maurizio agrees to “subordinate” his debt to theirs before the check is handed to Maurizio. They get paid, over the course of 5 years, what they are owed. Then Maurizio can get paid what he is owed.

Does this make sense to Maurizio? Of course it does. Maurizio still owns 62% of the shares of Auryn. After being put to work that $4 million will probably enhance the value of Maurizio’s shares by a heck of a lot more than the $10.3 million Maurizio is owed. That’s called “leverage beta”. IN A SCENARIO LIKE THIS, EXPECT CASH DIVIDEND DISTRIBUTIONS TO BECOME THE PRIMARY ROUTE TOWARDS “SHAREHOLDER REWARDS” FOR ALL OF US.

Remember that Maurizio’s shares are “Control” and/or “Restricted” securities as per Rule 144. He can’t sell many shares per quarter because of this BUT HIS SHARES EARN CASH DIVIDENDS JUST LIKE OUR “FREE TRADING” SHARES DO.

A froth flotation circuit has immense “leverage beta” especially when the prices of the 3 metals being “concentrated” are trading at or near all-time highs. An FF plant markedly drives down the AISC cost per ounce to produce each ounce of gold contained in the “concentrate”. Extremely high-grade ore also markedly drives down the AISC. The amount of “leverage beta” in a scenario like this is totally insane because of the prices of the metals being sold.

THE HIRING OF AMECO, SA AS “MINE OPERATOR”: Auryn signed a 5-year deal with Ameco, SA. They are to act as the “mine operator” over that 5-year period. In a “sub level stoping” operation, the mine operator is going to have a lot of work to do. They will earn their keep and then some. The maximum amount they can earn is $20 million over the life of the 5-year contract, which equates to a maximum amount of about $4 million per year.

Some people on TheMiningPlay forum are trying very hard to convince you that there is some kind of a $20 million debt CURRENTLY on the books that needs to be serviced immediately. They’re also trying to convince you that shareholders can’t make a penny until Maurizio is fully paid off. Please don’t fall for that.

Think about it, we’re going to go through probably $4 million worth of diesel over the next 10 years, is that a debt that is due today also? No. “Ameco, SA” used to be a subdivision of the engineering behemoth “Fluor” until “The Ashmore Group/Stracon” took them out.

Ashmore/Stracon is the “mine operator” at 51 mines in Chile, Peru, Colombia, and Mexico. Several of these are “World Class Tier 1” mines like Los Pelambres, for example.

The Ashmore Group is a London-based consortium that manages $65 billion in assets. They bought out Stracon. Although you’ve probably forgotten it by now, approximately 5 or 6 years ago Auryn appointed Dan Dumas, of Dumas Contracting, to act as Auryn’s VP of Engineering. Ashmore/ Stracon bought out Dumas Contracting, who was one of the premier underground mining contractors in the world. Ashmore/Stracon is extremely acquisitive and has been buying out high tech firms with connections to the mining industry.

Maurizio has been associated with “Dumas, Ashmore/Stracon, etc. for many years. Maurizio recently bought, out of bankruptcy, what was previously the second largest underground gold mine in Colombia. The project ran into some “geotechnical” issues years ago that apparently some engineers discovered the solution to. Who are his partners in that endeavor? None other than Ashmore/Stracon. He was on-site there when I communicated with him about 72 hours ago, informing him that the Auryn website went down. He didn’t know about it, and he said he’d rectify it immediately and he (or perhaps Kevin) did just that.

I believe that the mine in Colombia will serve as a nice template for us shareholders of Auryn/Medinah. I personally want to get some expectations as to how the “fine tuning” process goes for a new high tech FF plant with all of the bells and whistles. They are a couple of years ahead of us in installing their new froth flotation system which is perfect for us from a learning point of view.

When I last chatted on the phone with Maurizio, he reviewed the stats from the “fine tuning” process at the Colombia mine. I believe their plant is rated at 200 tonnes per day, whereas ours was originally set at 100 tpd but then Auryn management mentioned in an update that they added to the original order in mid-fabrication. I do not know the current rating and if the new additions added to the original throughput number or not.

The month over month improvements in production at the Colombia mine blew me away. Apparently, the daily throughput ratings get exceeded fairly regularly which I didn’t realize. Maurizio is a bit of a “brainiac”. He can, and will, rattle off production numbers and statistics like nothing I’ve ever witnessed. He’s both a technology entrepreneur and a mining entrepreneur. I can see the fit between Maurizio and Stracon quite easily i.e. extremely high-tech mining. Some very, very powerful mining people now have a whole bunch of “skin in the game” with Auryn. All of these parties will benefit especially if Auryn can rapidly ramp up production rates. Auryn has already listed 8 potential production sites each doing 1,000 tonnes per month. They include: the DL2 Vein at level 3, the Caren Mine, Merlin 1 Vein north, Merlin 1 Vein south, Merlin 4 Vein north, Merlin 4 Vein south, and 2 separate sites at what is known as “Fortuna 1913”.

In order to model potential earnings through time, you need to get an appreciation for how long it takes to incrementally add each new production site. Might it take a quarter to add each new sit? I have no clue. Because of the INSANE profit margins available with a very low AISC, and metals prices through the roof, you can safely bet that this overall “team” is going to go balls to the wall to rapidly crank up production.

Maurizio already has inventions out there in use in the industry. When Chile’s permitting authority “SERNAGEOMIN” was recently on-site at the DL2 Mine, their rep kept talking about the advanced technology that was present at the DL2 Mine. Shortly thereafter, SERNAGEOMIN asked Auryn to give some workshops to the wider mining community in Chile, regarding technological advances especially related to new blasting techniques. Chile’s Minister of Mining even attended one.

When Kevin first flew up to meet Maurizio at the PDAC Mining Convention several years ago, he commented to me: Doc, you’re not going to believe this guy. As they strolled through the convention floor, everybody recognized Maurizio and called him by name, and he would whisper to Kevin that’s “Bob” over there, he is head of South American operations for Newmont or Barrick or whomever.

In the South American mining industry, apparently everybody knows everybody else. Maurizio also “hangs out” with some South American mining powers a lot bigger than Ashmore/Stracon.

I asked Maurizio once if he would ever sell Auryn. His answer was at first “NEVER”. Then he immediately came back to qualify that with “never say never”. As it turns out, the ability to rapidly ramp up production is kind of a freebie in this industry. You commence operations and you diagnose “bottlenecks”, and you address them. One of Auryn’s collaborators is Dr. Helmut Mischo from Freiberg University in Germany. He’s written over 185 scientific articles in the various mining journals.

He made the comment that once Auryn gets the FF plant “dialed-in”, then the ramping up process will be very “STRAIGHT-FORWARD”. The Professor of Mining Engineering from the San Sebastian University in Chile, Senor de la Torre (sp?) who is also a close collaborator with Maurizio, and who used to be Head of Underground Operations at Chile’s gigantic El Penon Mine for Yamana Mining (later bought by Pan Am Silver), said that he could see Auryn’s vein operations sharing many of the characteristics of the El Penon Mine. At El Penon they are also mining 7 Main Veins, currently from 38 operational sites. Over time the miners generate these “cross-cuts” that end up connecting all of the veins together. We have one vein, the Merlin 3 Vein, that nicely connects several of the 7 Main Veins together. This might keep the grades fairly “homogenous” due to the intermixing of the hydrothermal fluids during the paragenesis of the deposit.

I’ve studied the El Penon project fairly well over the years partly because my ex-college roommate/fraternity brother was with “Meridian” when they first made the discovery. (Don’t tell him, but my brother ended up marrying his old girl friend from college). What I do know is that the grades at the DL2 Vein blow away those found at El Penon. Pan Am is currently making a fortune there but they’re currently mining only 4.5 gpt gold, which is just above the worldwide average of 4.18 gpt gold.

In reading the posts on TheMiningPlay forum, what I think people don’t yet realize is just how much money can be made mining ore with the grades that Auryn has, when the prices of gold, silver, and copper are ALL trading at or near all-time highs like they currently are, and you have a very low AISC. The artisanal miners at Auryn’s DL2 Vein were averaging 64 gpt gold which is wonderful but the price of gold at the time was $35 per ounce. The price of gold has gone up 100-fold since then.

We participants of this forum watch gold go up in price day after day, and we think that’s fine, but it sure doesn’t seem to be affecting our investment. There are 3,000 junior mineral explorers/developers in existence right now. They’re all competing for attention from a finite number of potential investors.

The way you put some distance between yourself, and the rest of the pack is to first make a discovery and then do what is necessary to put it into production. The World Gold Council tells us that it takes an average of in between 17 and 24 years, from the commencement of exploration to Day 1 of production, for the 1-in-1,000 junior explorer able to not only make a discovery but to also put it into production. This is exactly why this is an investment sector characterized as being composed of investors/speculators assuming ULTRA-HIGH RISKS while searching for ULTRA-HIGH REWARDS.

Keep in mind that the incremental increases in the POG in this industry tend to drop straight down to the bottom line. I’ve been extremely active in this sector for 45 years and I’ve never seen a miner able to comfortably clear around $2,200 to $2,300 per ounce of gold mined. As the POG goes up, the “mine life” also goes up as more and more of the ounces in the ground become “economic”. With the prices of gold and silver going up 25 to 30% year over year, the NET PRESENT VALUE of Auryn’s mineral assets, like the stockpiled ore and the ounces still in the ground, have gone up markedly. But you can’t expect the share prices to go up UNTIL you irrefutably prove to the world that you are one of those 1-in-1,000 juniors that really are funded and about to go into production. Until that time, the other 2,999 are going to block visibility of you, and absolutely NOBODY would ever believe that those knuckleheads from Medinah could ever own 24% of the shares of somebody that did pull this off.

12 Likes

I just decided to not buy $20 in the lotto tonite. I’ll wait on MC instead. Thanks for your extremely well written recant, BB!!!

2 Likes

And just to clarify what I meant by “recant”. Not of anything that BB has stated in the past, but of the insinuations that JAK167 made…

1 Like

SISAC FINANCING - 4,000,000.00 at 8%, zero payments for 10 months, then monthly for the remaining 4.16 years.

Payment = 100,887.19 per month for 50 months

MC DEBT: Plus, you have to add whatever MC will accept as a monthly payment on his debt.

If he takes a 5-year term, then his monthly payment is 166,666.67.

TOTAL MONTLY DEBT SERVICE: Under these assumptions, the total monthly debt payments = 267,553.86

A year of those payments is 3,210,646.32

Conservative Numbers: Producing at 100 tons per day at 20 grams per ton for 300 days in a year would yield approximately 36,270,096.46.

At that level, plenty to service the debt easily, even pay a little tax - and maybe even pay a nice ….. dividend?

Am I thinking right here?

3 Likes

Thank you Doc.

Why isn’t the $4M loan included on the balance sheet or anywhere else on the f/s?