Jimmy,
I’d like to think I’m viewing things through an objective lens. However, I do think its relevant to point out the flawed analsysis of the most eternally bullish posters in this board’s history given past inaccuracies. I don’t pretend to be as “technically knowledgeable” as BB but I do understand the market and have picked up an abundance of knowledge investing in the precious metals sector since I punted MDMN many moons ago. I understand offtake agreements, scaleability issues, capex realities, what the market values, etc, etc.
With this knowledge I may invest in AUMC (not MDMN) at the right time and valuation. This is partly while I’m here. The other part is simply to stay involved in a “story” that captures my interest after a long history.
My main point in “attacking” BB’s post is that the guy never learns. AUMC is limping along on a commendable path. The BS coming from BB on all of the near-term catalysts are simply unacheivable. Cornhusker is the most realistic, knowledgable, poster on his board. I would encourage you to read through his posts for an unbiased take on where things are today and the potential moving forward.
I’ll hold off until the next company update to make further comments. Don’t expect BB to back down on his predictions that the company is imminently on the brink of greatness after the next disappointing update. Same record, different decade.