Auryn/Medinah - 2023 1st Half General Discussion

For those wondering what is going on . . . the company is conducting a thorough analysis of the ore to determine the best method or methods for processing.

Gold ore can be processed in several ways, depending on the nature of the ore, its size, the presence of other minerals, and the final quality required of the gold. Here are some of the most common methods:

  1. Gravity Separation: This method makes use of the difference in density between gold and the impurities. It’s often the first step in gold processing because it’s relatively simple and cost-effective. Gold particles are separated from the ore using various devices such as sluice boxes, jigs, and centrifugal concentrators.
  2. Flotation: This method is typically used when gold is combined with sulfide minerals like pyrite or arsenopyrite. The process involves grinding the ore into a fine powder, then mixing it with water and chemicals that bind to the gold and float it to the surface. The gold-rich froth is then skimmed off the top for further processing.
  3. Cyanidation: This is the most commonly used method for processing gold ore. It involves treating the ore with a cyanide solution, which binds to the gold particles and forms a soluble compound that can be separated from the rest of the ore. The gold can then be precipitated out of this solution by adding zinc. This method can be used in either heap leaching, where the solution is applied to a pile of ore, or in carbon-in-leach processes, where the ore is ground and mixed with activated carbon before the cyanide solution is applied.
  4. Bioleaching: This is a more environmentally-friendly method that uses bacteria to extract gold from the ore. Certain types of bacteria can consume sulfide minerals and produce a weak sulfuric acid as a byproduct, which can then leach out the gold.
  5. Refractory Processing: If the gold is encased in sulfide minerals (making it “refractory”), it won’t react with the cyanide solution used in cyanidation. In this case, the ore has to be pre-treated to remove or alter the sulfides so the gold can be accessed. This can be done with roasting or pressure oxidation, both of which involve heating the ore to high temperatures.

Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of method depends on a variety of factors, including the nature of the ore, environmental considerations, and cost. Often, more than one method is used in combination to achieve the best results.

10 Likes

Thank you Kevin for the breakdown. When you say company, is this the mineral trader from Peru that has a term sheet Mou with Auryn or Auryn themselves?

The recovery rate for gold extraction methods can vary widely depending on the specific nature of the ore and the particular extraction method used. However, here are some typical recovery rates:

  1. Gravity Separation: For free-milling ores, gravity separation can achieve high recovery rates, often up to 90% or more. However, for complex ores or ores with fine gold particles, the recovery rate can be much lower.

  2. Flotation: Flotation can also achieve high recovery rates, often over 90%, for sulfide-associated gold. However, the gold concentrate needs to be further processed, usually with cyanidation.

  3. Cyanidation: When used on free-milling ores, cyanidation can achieve gold recovery rates over 95%. For complex ores, the recovery rate can be lower, but cyanidation is still often the best option because of its relatively low cost and high efficiency.

  4. Bioleaching: The recovery rate for bioleaching can vary widely, from as low as 50% to as high as 90%, depending on the specific nature of the ore.

  5. Refractory Processing:

    • Roasting: Recovery rates can be quite high, often over 90%, but the process is energy-intensive and can be expensive.
    • Pressure Oxidation (POX): Recovery rates can be very high, often over 90%, but the process is also energy-intensive and can be expensive.
    • Bio-Oxidation: Recovery rates are usually in the 80% to 90% range, and the process is less energy-intensive than roasting or POX, making it a more environmentally-friendly option.
    • Ultrafine Grinding: This method can achieve high recovery rates, but it’s energy-intensive and can lead to high wear and tear on equipment.
    • Nitric Acid Pretreatment and Alkaline Oxidative Leaching: These methods can also achieve high recovery rates, but they are often used in combination with other methods, such as cyanidation.

Please note that these are typical recovery rates, and actual rates can vary depending on many factors, including the quality of the ore, the specific extraction method used, and the expertise of the personnel carrying out the extraction process.

5 Likes

AURYN is conducting the analysis, as far as I’m aware. I suspect it is required by the mineral trader, but I don’t know that.

6 Likes

Yea good luck getting any sort of decent size position at .75 now, let alone after any single milestone is made. Mark this post.

1 Like

Baldy,
I don’t pretend anything here. You and I quite simply have a completely different perspective on this one equity. I hold it for a very specific reason, and you sold it when you did because it benefitted you in a particular way. I did not have that option and so in that respect I’m a stuckholder. I’m not advocating buying MDMN to average down because I’m already overweight here. For many years I bought dollar for dollar the same amount in CDCH and MDMN. As a result, I have a respectable position in AUMC which apparently you do not, and a large MDMN position that I’m neither buying nor selling. I agree with all your reasons for not holding this stock, and why you are not buying. Most investors quite wisely are risk adverse in the present era of uncertainty. Both AUMC and MDMN are presently illiquid. I invest to make a profit the same as you do, preferably in equities that are both liquid and have good fundamentals. I’ll repeat for the umptieth time I have a large “FULL” position in this stock held in an IRA and ROTH. I know why I post here. I do question what your purpose in posting here is. At times you are entertaining and laughable! Only 12 posts in 12 days without a company update? :rofl: :point_down:

It is an annoyance (to me personally) with your attitude of a know it all that knows better than management in this particular stock. Your way to investing in this stock is not wrong, but it is also NOT suitable for all stockholders here. You fail to recognize and respect other shareholders points of view and why they did not sell and wait to buy back as you may eventually do.

You cover no new ground in your posts to anyone holding this stock long term, and primarily kept in a sock drawer. I did misspeak when I attributed your focus to the past management; I should have said it reminded me of why we took several giant steps backwards when the prior management’s myriad misrepresentations to stockholders were finally being exposed in 2016 and the lawsuits that followed. The present management has made tremendous strides forward compared to where we stockholders were at back in 2016, and finally started moving forward in 2017 with their longer term planning. If you could get off your high horse of always being right and everyone else is wrong when presenting your viewpoints it would be less of an issue.

Continue using your investment acumen for profits in the DOW, S&P, and NASDAQ. NASDAQ was down 33% last year and has come back 22%. Stocks can exhibit both cyclic and seasonal effects. ( an interesting article on seasonality - Best and Worst Months for the Stock Market - Seasonal Patterns - Trade That Swing). This stock is clearly not in the same category as major markets, or investable with the same metrics used in the major markets. AUMC is in a unique market and stage of it’s development. Management is looking for it’s payday the same as investors. Management is not looking to unload for $30M all at once as you frivolously suggested recently.

“A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.”
Winston Churchill

11 Likes

Marked. Wasn’t hitting the DL Vein, when they actually hit it, a milestone? What’s the next one, just so I can keep track? An MOU with a global minerals trader? This is becoming comical

YOUR QUOTE was that you would rather take a position at .75 AFTER they hit milestones. Your words, not mine.

Once we get the answer on the metallurgy tests, it’s just a matter of:

Effecting the deal
Finishing the chimney/escape route
Purchasing whatever equipment is necessary for processing, scooping, and hauling
Setting it all up
Getting to work

Probably a lot of detail I’m leaving out, but it all seems logistical, except for the negotiating and decision on the deal.

The point is it all seems logistical.

I imagine, in time they’ll want to construct a camp so work can be done 24/7.

New mining faces.

Maybe I’m naive to think these guys can make a profit - MC gets his money paid back and then we get dividends? Hopium.

1 Like

WHAT KIND OF GRADES TO EXPECT IN THE ORE THAT AURYN WILL BE MINING AND SHIPPING WHEN AND WHERE THEY COMMENCE PRODUCTION

First of all, the point would need to be made that this subject couldn’t even be broached UNLESS Auryn is going to commence production at the very same spot that the artisanal miners ceased operations i.e. at the 1.840 meters above sea level elevation (level 3), immediately beneath where the artisanal miners ceased operations. This being the case, then there is a plethora of historical data available to ROUGHLY project an estimated SHIPPING GRADE.

FACTS

  1. The artisanal miners averaged a SHIPPING GRADE (DL2 Vein material plus lower grade surrounding wall rock) of 64 gpt. The amount of ore shipped was 2,000 tonnes.
  2. After cleaning up the tunnels within the “old workings”, Auryn removed 54 tonnes of DL2 Vein ore that averaged a SHIPPING GRADE (without beneficiation) of 85 gpt gold. WHAT IS INTERESTING IS THAT THIS VEIN MATERIAL DID NOT NEED ANY BLASTING WHATSOEVER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. It remains to be seen if Auryn can have this same good fortune in their upcoming exploitation efforts involving mining the DL2 Vein ore slightly below this area. The texture of the DL2 Vein ore appears to be vastly different from the host rock (granodiorite) that Auryn had to drill through while drifting the Antonino Adit. Management cited the extreme hardness of the rock being removed from the Antonino Adit drifting.
  3. Auryn took 12 samples of the DL2 Vein ore from the level 2 to 3 area, under the location where shaft A intersected the DL2 Vein. This location is about 100-meters NNW of the intersection of the Antonino Adit and the DL2 Vein. The average VEIN GRADE was about 150 gpt gold. Several samples were over 100 gpt gold and one was actually 1,220 gpt gold with off the chart silver grades. (WARNING: Possible “nugget effect” involved).
  4. Upon intersecting the DL2 Vein via the Antonino Adit, the first round of four, 0.6-meter-wide channel samples of the DL2 Vein, revealed an average VEIN GRADE of 164 gpt gold and 4.5% copper. These results were reported in a very professional manner delineating the grades of gold, copper and silver. The gold grades were measured by the most accurate of all gold assay procedures, namely the “fire assay”.
  5. A second round of sampling from this area came in at a “VEIN GRADE” OF “about 150 gpt gold”. This report was made in a much more nonchalant manner. The wording was basically, “as expected, the second round of samples came in at about 150 gpt gold”. This second tranche of sampling came from the same area at the site of the intersection, but it was done at a later time because of an equipment breakdown prior to the DL2 Vein being completely uncovered. The first tranche was taken from near the floor of the adit at the intersection point while the second was taken from near the “back/roof” of the adit at the intersection point.
  6. Note that these grades were VEIN GRADES. What we are actually waiting for are SHIPPING GRADES. These will incorporate (but not isolate) things like the ratio of the width of the working face that is composed of VEIN MATERIAL versus less-mineralized wall rock, the grades of the less-mineralized wall rock, and the efficiency of any post-mining “beneficiation/concentration” procedures deployed. The paycheck received will be determined by TONNAGE and SHIPPING GRADES. The results of the METALLURGICAL testing being currently done at 2 labs in Peru which involve gravimetric beneficiation using centrifuges, should give us a better indication of projected SHIPPING GRADES.
  7. In Q-1 of 2021, Auryn shipped 9 tonnes of ore to Enami, with an average SHIPPING GRADE of 45 gpt gold.
  8. All of these grades were achieved WITHOUT the benefit of modern day “beneficiation/concentration” methodologies designed to remove impurities and thereby enhance the grade.
  9. In the end, the only grade that really matters is the SHIPPING GRADE of the “concentrate” being purchased. From an ECONOMICS point of view, the keys will be the terms of the offtake agreement with the party purchasing the ore, the price of gold and copper, and the ALL IN SUSTAINING COST (AISC) to produce each ounce of gold concentrate purchased by the buyer.

IF THERE WAS ONE CHARACTERISTIC OF THIS DL2 VEIN PROJECT THAT STANDS HEADS AND SHOULDERS ABOVE ALL OTHER CHARACTERISTICS, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE THE INCREDIBLY HIGH GRADES OF THE ORE, ESPECIALLY IN COMPARISON TO THE AVERAGE GRADE BEING MINED WORLDWIDE IN SIMILAR UNDERGROUND VEIN DEPOSITS OF 4.15 gpt GOLD. I’ll review the relationship between GRADES and PROFITABILITY in a moment.

RELEVANT INFORMATION

-despite the extremely robust grades averaged by the artisanal miners of 64 gpt gold, their mining and recovery methods were so inefficient that their tailings/discards averaged 14 gpt gold.
-50% of the ore mined by the artisanal miners had a preponderance of “fines” consisting of extremely small particles of gold. These miners had a very difficult time recovering the “fines” using the technologies available 75 years ago. Nowadays the various manufacturers of gravimetric concentration equipment (like Sepro and Knelson) have makes and models that are designed specifically for the recovery of “fines”.

WHAT DOES THE HISTORICAL DATA SUGGEST ABOUT THE AMENABILITY OF THE DL2 VEIN ORE TO BEING “BENEFICIATED” BY THE VARIOUS METHODOLOGIES AVAILABLE TODAY?

-The artisanal miners experimented with a 4-cell “flotation” circuit designed to remove more of the “sulfides”. They were able to get the 64 gpt average up to 92 gpt gold.
-In their last year of operations, the artisanal miners experimented with an undisclosed type of beneficiation methodology. This methodology (probably using gravimetrics) allowed them to get the average SHIPPING GRADE up to 102.7 gpt gold from 64 gpt gold. THE ORE SOURCED FOR THIS TESTING WAS TAKEN FROM LEVEL 2 IMMEDIATELY ABOVE WHERE AURYN IS TO RECOMMENCE PRODUCTION.
-Auryn has already completed testing of beneficiation methodologies known as gravimetric concentration. This technology (manufactured by “SEPRO/Falconer”) recovered over 90% of “even the fines”. As we speak, even newer methodologies are being tested in 2 labs in Peru to determine recoverability.

-THE QUESTION THEN BECOMES, BASED ON THE HISTORICAL MINING GRADES CITED ABOVE, AS WELL AS THE HISTORICAL “BENEFICIATION” EFFORTS JUST CITED, AS WELL AS THE CURRENT STATE OF THE ART IN “BENEFICIATION METHODOLOGIES, WHAT KIND OF PROJECTED “SHIPPING GRADES” MIGHT BE ANTICIPATED FOR AURYN WHO IS ABOUT TO RECOMMENCE PRODUCTION AT THE SAME SITE WHERE THE ARTISANAL MINERS CEASED OPERATIONS.
I think that we are close enough to receiving actual results that making projections might not be advisable.
-Note that in order to make any FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS we would still need to know the terms of any offtake agreement entered into as well as projected production rates per level, the number of levels anticipated to be in production simultaneously, ALL IN SUSTAINING COSTS, etc. Management promised “financial projections” soon after commencing production.
-When Maurizio was about to put the Larrissa Adit into production prior to SERNAGEOMIN mandating the construction of 3 approximately 140-meter tall “ventilation/safety egress chimneys” which led to putting the DL2 Vein into production first, he spoke of putting 6 levels below the Larrissa Adit level into production as well as 7 levels above the Larrissa Adit into simultaneous production. I don’t know if his ambitions have changed much since, but I wouldn’t at all be surprised if the “ramping up” of the number of sub-levels going into production might be quicker than many might otherwise sense. Once into production, all of a sudden everybody in the mining sector that does financings becomes your best buddy because of the “DERISKING” involved. If the “INTERNATIONAL MINERALS TRADER” becomes involved, and if they have deep pockets, then I would think that they would be highly financially incentivized to have the “ramp-up” in production occur rapidly. Back at the “informational meeting”, held in Las Vegas several years ago, Maurizio made it very clear that he wanted to become a “mid-tier gold producer” as rapidly as possible. This translates into producing somewhere around 300,000 ounces of gold annually. Up until I read his words about the original plans for the Larrissa Adit and simultaneously producing from 14 separate levels, I thought that his stated goal about becoming a “mid-tier gold producer” was a little bit “out there”. Now, I’m not so sure. I also never envisioned a bunch of Chilean Mining Ministers touring around in our adit or Auryn hosting “workshops” designed to teach the mining community about proper ESG compliance protocols and new breakthroughs in mining technology. Keep in mind, however, that things in this industry are famous for moving slowly.

3 Likes

All good questions and fun to speculate about. Another question would be: where did the ~$300k (54 tonnes at 85gpt) and subsequent ~$27k (9 tonnes at 45gpt) go? If they actually shipped to Enami one would think, or at least ask, why the company financials reflect zero revenues over those time periods.

You could assume that the following would offer an explanation:

“The Company holds a mining option contract with a related party. Pursuant to the agreement with that related party they would incur all expenses related to the exploration and exploitation of minerals. There will be no repayment of those expenses from Auryn Mining. When minerals are found and sold the profits will reimburse the related party for all expenses incurred before profits are shared with Auryn Mining. As of December 31, 2021, the related party has incurred approximately $2,585,000 of expenses. These funds will not be refunded or repaid by the Company and are not payables of the Company and have therefore been excluded from the income statement for the year ended December 31, 2021.”

Maybe those lost revenues went towards paying down Maurizio’s accrued debt? However, if that is the case it would legally need to be detailed in the financials/filings. Maybe the shipments never happened. If they did, its a scary concept to think that the “insider third party” is going to be paying down this debt without investors knowing when, how much, etc.

*"As of September 30, 2022, the related party has incurred approximately *
$3,260,000 in expenses."

*"As of December 31, 2022, the related party has incurred approximately *
$3,685,000 in expenses"

Just another thing to speculate on.

1 Like

Re: all of this, one must understand how the gold is situated in the ore - that impacts the recovery rate, cost of processing, and (potentially) who is interested in buying it. See my previous posts.

4 Likes

And this was with archaic recovery methods. However it was likely that the rock was hand picked. So what do you realistically expect on bulk shipping basis with wall rock included?

Hi Jimmyp,

Sorry I’m so slow in getting back to you. I think that both the artisanal miners and Auryn will have done “hand sorting” prior to crushing. Clearly visually unmineralized rock will probably be discarded prior to crushing. Visually, the wall rock granodiorite looks like a granite countertop. You have that “salt and pepper” appearance with light-colored quartz and plagioclase feldspar and dark-colored hornblende and pyroxene crystals. It’s pretty distinctive. It helps the preliminary sorting process when the vein material is visually different than the wall rock material.

I’d think of the ore as always being in one state of “beneficiation/concentration” or another. After blasting the working face of an adit, you have on the adit floor “run of mine” (“RoM”) ore. As I understand it, that gets brought up to the plateau and is visually sorted as to mineralized versus nonmineralized. The visually-mineralized “sorted ore” gets thrown into one or more crushers until the size mandated by either the purchaser or that mandated by the gravimetric concentration apparatus for highest recovery rate is reached.

The resultant “comminuted ore” runs (or will run) through the chosen gravimetric concentration apparatus and the higher concentration material, found near the periphery of the centrifuge, goes into the high concentration ore pile and the other material into a less-concentrated ore pile. The highly concentrated ore often becomes “direct shipping ore” that is not in need of further purification prior to shipping. The less concentrated ore might need further purification and it could be headed to a “roaster” to oxidize the sulfides, to a “flotation plant” to remove the sulfides, or to a pressure oxidation (POX) facility or to a bio-oxidation (BIOX) facility. In essence, there might be a variety of “SHIPPING GRADES” heading down the hill, depending on what Maurizio opts to do on site and what the INTERNATIONAL MINERALS TRADER (if they become our partners) is equipped to do at their facility.

Recall that the University of San Sebastian is running tests for Auryn on “flotation” systems. Some MINERAL TRADERS have custom blending facilities and they will blend different grades of ore in order to maximize the ECONOMICS.

One of the key parameters for SHIPPING GRADES is what % of the working face of the adit is the EXTREMELY HIGH-GRADE VEIN MATERIAL versus less-mineralized wall rock. I’m pretty sure that the adits of the artisanal miners were narrower than those of Auryn. But the vein width in levels 0,1 and 2 was also narrower than the approximately 0.6 meters seen at level 3. There is a minimum width to the adits used by the artisanal miners because they had to get people and some type of equipment into and out of there.

With Auryn, the adits currently are about 3 to 3.5-meters in width and the same in height. You can see in some of the videos how that Cat 928 G wheel loader was barreling down the adit and you could see some adit width lateral to the bucket width which is 2.55-meters if that is the standard bucket they’re using.

What’s going to be interesting, is how much ore Auryn can remove WITHOUT BLASTING like they did up above in the “old workings” when they removed the 54-tonnes of 85 gpt gold material. If they can get in there and scrape away the vein material with a backhoe type claw, and remove that very high-grade ore and then worry about the wall rock on each side, that would be a good way to do some preliminary “sorting”. I’m guessing the granodiorite wall rock material will need blasting. I think they call this approach “split blasting”.

I feel more comfortable in NOT projecting the average SHIPPING GRADES now because I sense that the actual numbers aren’t too far away especially if they can choose and then install the MOST EFFICIENT gravimetric plant quickly. These aren’t that large and I believe most are portable. While constructing the now completed “gallery”, Auryn stockpiled 80-tonnes of MINERALIZED ORE but they mentioned that it hadn’t been “sorted” yet. So, “sorting” is part of the process for Auryn. With the given dimensions of the “ventilation/safety egress chimney” i.e. 30-meters in length and assuming the same width as that of the adit, there should be about 170 to 200 tonnes of just VEIN MATERIAL plus whatever amount of wall rock that doesn’t get discarded. So, between the gallery and the chimney ore, we’ll soon have somewhere around 20-or-so truckloads of ore (16.7 tonnes per truckload) to play with. That’s enough to get a good read on average SHIPPING GRADES.

I’m not sure if Auryn would ship this ore PRIOR TO gravimetric beneficiation or just wait until the “gravimetric plant” is delivered. If the ore is to be shipped to the “INTERNATIONAL MINERALS TRADER’S” facilities (should they be chosen as the partner), then I would assume that they’d want the ore to be treated first with the gravimetric methodology. The basic ECONOMICS centers around concentrating the ore on-site as best as you can inexpensively so that less worthless gangue that doesn’t earn any income, gets shipped.

Keep in mind that when dealing with these MESOTHERMAL VEINS, BOTH the width and grade will tend to increase with depth. That’s the only “leak” we’ve got out of the Sillitoe report. It said something like “like other mesothermal veins, the grades and widths are becoming more favorable with depth” (paraphrasing). Thus, the INITIAL SHIPPING GRADES might be expected to increase with depth DUE TO IMPROVEMENTS IN EACH OF THOSE 2 FACTORS-IMPROVING GRADE AND WIDTH.

It will be interesting to see, as the “decline spiral” opens up new sub levels for exploitation, how the widths and grades will be affected with depth. I’m hoping they will be sinking the decline spiral and “opening up” the various levels by punching a hole through the DL2 Vein “sheet of plywood” and then report back to us the grades and widths, before they start the mining process on those levels. If you accidentally intersect an “ore shoot” with screamingly high grades then that would make things interesting.

If a given sub level happens to have real strong widths and/or atypically high grades, I would assume that management will preferentially go after that level with a sense of urgency i.e. “high-grading”. In a scenario like Auryn’s, EXPLOITATION at progressively lower levels is also EXPLORATION except you get paid to do it instead of paying to do it. It also allows you to block out MR/MR. With those kinds of grades, you might be able to block out a lot of ounces of MR/MR fairly rapidly.

I’m going to assume that the METALLURGICAL TESTING will dictate what type of gravimetric methodology works the best with our ore. There will be a certain “MESH SIZE” post-crushing and pulverizing that brings about the best recovery rates. For the artisanal miners it was a “minus 200 Tyler mesh”. The artisanal miners had good results when they tinkered with different concentrating methodologies. A crude flotation system got their 64 gpt gold average SHIPPING GRADE up to 92 gpt gold. In 1970 they experimented with an undisclosed type of concentrating mechanism that got their 64 gpt figure up to 102.7 gpt gold.

Auryn has already played with a gravimetric concentration system and had “EXCELLENT RESULTS INVOLVING OVER A 90% RECOVERY RATE”. So, at least the DL2 ore has had a good history of being amenable to various “beneficiation/concentrating” methodologies but there’s always a certain fraction of the ore that might be “REFRACTORY ORE” that needs further treatment to separate the gold from the gangue (worthless material). A lot of the nuances of the DL2 Vein ore is already known because the mine has already produced 2,000 tonnes of ore over the course of 30 years.

Finding the offtake partner willing to pay the maximum amount can be a challenge. It sounds like Enami’s terms may have already been exceeded but who the heck knows who will table the best bid by the end of the process. Hopefully, there will be plenty of bidders for our ore at a time when few new sources of “concentrate” become available. A “gold/copper concentrate” could obviously be a hot commodity nowadays with the POG like it is and the demand for copper like it is likely about to become.

The good news is that at the end of the day, although the ore metallurgy is important, the ECONOMICS will be most determined by GRADE. There is no arguing that this is EXTREMELY HIGH-GRADE GOLD ORE. EXTREMELY HIGH-GRADE GOLD ORE tends to have EXTREMELY LOW ALL IN SUSTAINING COSTS (AISCs) to produce each ounce of gold within that “concentrate”. This translates into EXTREMELY HIGH-GRADE ORE TENDING TO HAVE EXTREMELY HIGH “MARGINAL PROFITS” PER OUNCE PRODUCED. ANY “REFRACTORY ORE” WILL HAVE A HIGHER AISC.

The way you might want to think of MINERAL ECONOMICS AS A FUNCTION OF GRADE is like this. Pretend that there is another junior producer on top of our plateau that is mining the worldwide average of 4 gpt gold ore from a different vein. Pretend that Auryn is cranking out gold with the same SHIPPING GRADE as the artisanal miners i.e. 64 gpt gold. (This is by no means a prediction but I want to be conservative.)

Let’s assume that the other miners have the same cost structure as Auryn, i.e. they pay the same wages, the same amount for diesel, explosives and electricity, the same amount for equipment and the same amount for transportation costs, etc. In other words, it costs the same amount (in TOTAL GROSS COSTS) for each company to fill up one truckload of ore and send it down the hill. The Auryn truck is going to have 15-TIMES AS MANY GOLD OUNCES IN IT because of the grade disparity. Compared to the other producer, THE ALL IN SUSTAINING COST to produce EACH OUNCE of gold in a concentrate form in those truckloads, will be MUCH, MUCH less for Auryn. The 2 companies will be paid the same amount PER OUNCE of gold delivered NOT PER TRUCKLOAD.

When it comes to the MARGINAL PROFITS per ounce produced, (the amount paid per ounce minus the AISC to produce an ounce) Auryn’s MARGINAL PROFITS will crush the MARGINAL PROFITS of that other miner. When it comes to calculating the TOTAL PROFITS of each company, Auryn will be able to multiply a vastly superior MARGINAL PROFIT PER OUNCE produced by a VASTLY LARGER NUMBER OF OUNCES PRODUCED in a given amount of time. THE CONCEPT OF BEING ABLE TO MULTIPLY A VASTLY LARGER MARGINAL PROFIT PER OUNCE BY A VASTLY LARGER NUMBER OF OUNCES IS A PRETTY POWERFUL CONCEPT.

If the Auryn operation also has a VASTLY superior ability to ramp-up production levels (in terms of truckloads of ore) i.e. “SCALEABILITY” because it was able to tap into a VASTLY superior ventilation and safety exit system due to producing immediately under the “old workings”, and they’re able to safely mine several sub-levels at a time, then………you get the picture.

I call this phenomenon “MINING MATH”. It doesn’t seem fair to the guys mining 4 gpt gold ore but at least they’re making a buck or two at these gold price levels. Another “VASTLY” you can add to that string of “VASTLYs” is the VASTLY improved price of gold when compared to the $35 POG present when the artisanal miners were doing their mining. The POG has gone up 57-fold since then. The reason most of us (speculators) are invested in this sector is because we’ve read about these 30- and 40-baggers that others have experienced. The reason there are 30- and 40-baggers in this sector is “MINING MATH”. The catch is, only the producers of extremely high-grade ore have access to “MINING MATH”.

From my point of view, Auryn is “IN PRODUCTION” as we speak. The “ventilation/safety egress chimney” is being constructed WITHIN THE DL2 VEIN MATERIAL. They’re mining the DL2 Vein ore while going upwards at a 20-degree angle to level 2 of the “old workings”, where the fresh air resides. The artisanal miners mining in the “old workings”, immediately above where we are today, were mining this same DL2 Vein or “sheet of plywood”. The way you tie into the 7 shafts and 5 chimneys within the “old workings” is mine your ways upwards through the vein until you hit a big cavernous system of empty “stopes”.

This “Ventilation/safety egress chimney” has a variety of purposes. The first is VENTILATION. The second is to provide a safety egress manway. The third is to provide PRODUCTION during its construction. The fourth is to provide “SCALEABILITY” because of its provision of ventilation and a safety egress manway. The commissioning of each of those future sub levels into production, should double, then triple, then quadruple, then quintuple the original production rates from the 2 working faces provided by level 3.

Oh sure, the production levels will crank up like crazy soon but, like Kevin tried to tell all of us a while back, the single most important press release made in the history of Auryn had to do with finally intersecting the DL2 Vein and the SUCCESSFUL CONFIRMATION of the original assay results received from the original sampling at the intersection of the Antonino Adit and the DL2 Vein. It seemed like an innocuous tweet at the time. What happened was that Auryn hit the TRIFECTA. They finally located that elusive EXTREMELY HIGH-GRADE DL2 Vein after thrice thinking they hit it but the geochemistry failed to confirm it. They also successfully corroborated the EXTREMELY HIGH HISTORICAL SHIPPING GRADES and they completed the PRODUCTION ADIT (the Antonino Adit) needed to transport the mined ore up to the surface.

Auryn had already reached one of the most critical milestones in any mining project. They had already submitted their BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY several years ago and got it approved. Much more recently they successfully finished and submitted their OFFICIAL MINE CLOSURE PLAN and got it approved by SERNAGEOMIN. And they also completed their DEFINITIVE MINE PLAN, submitted it and got it approved by SERNAGEOMIN. This led to their being granted their DEFINITIVE EXPLOITATION PERMIT.

The Chilean Mining Inspectors, after a recent unannounced inspection of the DL2 Vein project was successfully completed, reminded management to tie-in the completed “ventilation/safety egress manway” with the current forced air ventilation system once the “chimney” was completed. I would imagine that the official ALLOWABLE PRODUCTION LEVELS will be determined once the new “chimney” is signed off on.

7 Likes

In another 6 weeks or so (early July), we get an update - can’t wait to hear what they have to say.

1 Like

This answers my question. You think 64 gpt shipping grade is conservative.

How many tons at this grade is mineable conservatively?

Hi Jimmyp,

As far as projecting Auryn’s average SHIPPING GRADE at this point in time for the DL2 Vein project, I think the conservative approach would be to just wait it out and see what the average SHIPPING GRADE is for the ore produced during the construction of the “gallery” (80 tonnes of MINERALIZED ORE that was still awaiting sorting) and the ore produced from the construction of the “ventilation/safety egress chimney” which should be several times that amount. This is all DL2 Vein ore. What we don’t know is if this ore will FIRST be treated with whatever the most efficient and environmentally friendly “gravimetric plant” that the testing in Peru is trying to determine or not.

For those that don’t want to wait until that ore is shipped, if you wanted to place a bet on the “over/under” in Las Vegas for Auryn’s average SHIPPING GRADE, then I’d let HISTORY be your best guide. The first thing you’d have to define is “OVER WHAT TIMEFRAME ARE WE MEASURING THE AVERAGE SHIPPING GRADE”. In my opinion, the SHIPPING GRADE is likely to increase over time until it eventually plateaus out. The HISTORICAL AVERAGE SHIPPING GRADE achieved by the artisanal miners over 30 years of mining (albeit at a de minimis daily production rate), but totaling 2,000 tonnes of ore, was 64 gpt gold as reported by Enami. Enami paid them based on those grades. As I understand it, with Enami, these are “agreed to” grades. If Enami didn’t like some contaminant in the ore, they’ll dock you up front and the producer and Enami will “agree to” a lesser grade. I think that 64 gpt grade should be your starting benchmark for now anyways.

This wouldn’t be the case if Auryn were to commence production from some site distant from where the artisanal miners were doing their mining but thankfully Auryn is recommencing production at the same spot where the artisanal miners ceased operations. THIS IS THE KEY TO MAKING SHIPPING GRADE PROJECTIONS. Rarely does a party doing due diligence on a mining project have this luxury. My gut feeling is that “the market” doesn’t appreciate this fact, whatsoever.

FACTORS THAT MIGHT HAVE AN EFFECT ON THE AVERAGE GRADE THAT AURYN IS LIKELY TO SHIP

  1. The artisanal miners mined a length of the DL2 Vein of about 350-meters to a depth of about 100-meters. In the top third of these “old workings”, the average SHIPPING GRADE was about 54 gpt gold. The middle third averaged about 64 gpt gold and the bottom third about 74 gpt gold. Auryn will be commencing operations at just below this bottom third. So, based on this, the case could be made that we should set the benchmark SHIPPING GRADE AVERAGE at somewhere around 74 gpt gold FROM AURYN’S UPCOMING PRODUCTION ESTIMATION POINT OF VIEW. These historical numbers make geological sense since the top of these hydrothermal structures, the “BARREN LITHOCAP” or “GOSSAN”, is, like its name implies, typically somewhat barren. Recall how the average grades of gold in the surface trenches was only about 3 gpt gold. In surface trenching, you want to determine if the veins are “gold-bearing” (auriferous) or not. Nobody expects high grades at surface. The next lower level in these hydrothermal structures is the “LEACHED ZONE”. Like its name implies, these levels are also typically low in grade because of the ACID LEACHING (from the oxidation of pyrite) of the contents of these zones resulting in dissolution of the metals and their being redeposited down layer in the structures.

The next lower zone is the OXIDE ZONE. Here you can start getting some decent grades plus the metal oxides found here are easier to treat than the metal sulfides found lower down. If the structure is lucky enough to have one, below this OXIDE ZONE is found the SUPERGENE ENRICHMENT ZONE or SGE zone. This is where the high-grade metals are often found. There aren’t that many SGE zones left in the world because the corporations lucky enough to have one tend to mine the heck out of it right from the get go. This is wonderful for the early shareholders but after 5 or 10 years the average grade is likely to go down. So, based on this, I would think that averaging a SHIPPING GRADE of 74 gpt gold (perhaps plus a bit) might be a CONSERVATIVE estimate.

  1. We are in a MESOTHERMAL VEIN system. These veins tend to not only WIDEN with depth, resulting in each working face having that much more of the high-grade VEIN ORE (and less of the lower grade wall rock), they also tend to INCREASE IN GRADE with depth. Based on this, perhaps that 74 gpt projection might be a bit low IF YOU’RE TRYING TO IDENTIFY THE AVERAGE SHIPPING GRADE OVER TIME.
  2. The Auryn geoscientists have noted that at level 2, the DL1 (skinnier vein) and the DL2(wider and richer vein) were 4 meters apart. At level 3, they were only 3-meters apart. The working theory is that they are about to merge soon at a lower level. This might result in a WIDER vein structure filling up more of the working face with higher-grade VEIN MATERIAL as opposed to wall rock. This may or may not put upward pressure on the AVERGE SHIPPING GRADE.
  3. As Auryn opens up the lower sub levels, they can opt to selectively mine the WIDEST and RICHEST veins they encounter first and hold off on the others. This “optionality” might put upward pressure on the AVERAGE SHIPPING GRADE.
  4. Auryn is planning on putting in their own on-site assay lab. This will allow them to be much more nimble in making decisions as to where to concentrate their efforts. The artisanal miners had to do things the old way. Prior to cutting a deal with the new lab, “AAA”, Auryn had to wait an inordinate amount of time in getting results back meaning decisions could not be made “on the fly”. Kevin made the point that the “VELOCITY” of developments should increase from here on out suggesting that the “bootstrapping” days might be behind us. During the “bootstrapping” days, management has the tendency to throw nickels around like man-hole covers but progress tends to be slow. The Covid pandemic didn’t help progress much.
  5. The on-site beneficiating technologies are vastly superior now to what they were when the artisanal miners were producing their 64 gpt gold ore. These miners had a terrible time recovering the “fines” (very small particle gold) with the existent technology. About 50% of the ore they mined had a significant amount of these “fines”. Their efficiency was so bad that the “tailings/discards” they left were still running at 14 gpt gold which is over 3-times the average “head-grade” of gold being mined today in underground vein operations. The artisanal miners tinkered with a couple of different beneficiation methodologies which got their average up to 92 gpt with a ”flotation” system and 102.7 gpt with an unidentified beneficiation system. This amenability of the DL2 ore to being beneficiated should put upward pressure on the average SHIPPING GRADE achieved by Auryn over time.
  6. In the “old workings” there was very little VISIBLE GOLD. At level 3, there was VISIBLE GOLD all over the place.
  7. From here on out, we need to be talking in terms of “gold equivalent” SHIPPING GRADES where the contribution from the copper is factored in and added to the gold SHIPPING GRADE. The “old workings” had negligible copper. At level 3, a very high-grade form of copper known as BORNITE was pretty much ubiquitous. The level 3 assays done at the intersection of the Antonino Adit and the DL2 Vein came in at a robust 4.5% copper. The average grade of copper being mined worldwide is currently 0.6%.

When I “pencil in” an average SHIPPING GRADE of 64 gpt gold for Auryn, I think I am being ULTRA-CONSERVATIVE but, again, we should know the accurate numbers soon. Maurizio seems to be a big proponent of the “underpromise and overdeliver” school of management.

AS FAR AS THE NUMBER OF TONNES OF ORE THAT COULD BE CONSERVATIVELY MINED ON A DAILY BASIS

Yet again, we need to look back at the HISTORY prior to making any projections. Unlike with the HISTORICAL SHIPPING GRADES, this time it is very RECENT HISTORY we need to study. The Auryn miners have been “MINING” in this area for quite some time. They just haven’t been “DIRECTLY MINING” the DL2 Vein ore because they just arrived on the scene recently. They’ve been doing “EXPLORATION/DEVELOPMENT MINING” with the intent to locate the high-grade DL2 Vein ore, gain access to it and provide a means to transport it out of the belly of the mountain and up to surface. They recently succeeded on all of these fronts including CORROBORATING the extremely high HISTORICAL SHIPPING GRADES with their channel sampling program done at the intersection of the Antonino Adit and the DL2 Vein. Here two groups of samplings revealed VEIN GRADES over a 0.6-meter width averaging in between 150 and 164 gpt gold. The associated SHIPPING GRADES will be less because of the less well-mineralized wall rock component of that which is shipped.

Pretty much the same “MINING” process that allowed the Auryn miners to drift the Larrissa and Antonino Adits (blast, scoop then transport to surface), for a combined amount of perhaps 700-meters in total, will be used to MINE the DL2 Vein ore. WE ALREADY KNOW HOW MUCH THEY “MINED” ON A DAILY BASIS WHEN THEY WERE BACK IN “BOOTSTRAPPING” MODE DURING THE COVID PANDEMIC. CAN YOU SENSE BOTH HOW RARE IT IS AND HOW FORTUNATE IT IS FOR ANYBODY DOING DUE DILIGENCE ON A MINING PROJECT TO HAVE A PRETTY GOOD READ ON PROBABLE SHIPPING GRADES AS WELL AS PROBABLE PRODUCTION RATES? I’ve never seen this before in 43 years of investing in this sector.

Auryn management kept us up to speed on the length of the Larrissa and Antonino Adits in their QUARTERLY UPDATES. For instance, in one recent quarter the miners advanced 95-meters in 1 quarter. Based on 5-day work weeks, they averaged about 1.44-meters in advancing the adit working face, per 9-hour workday. Management announced that they will be working 24-hour workdays after commencing production. For the sake of conservatism, let’s say that they can double the meters mined per day by going from 9-hour to 24-hour workdays. This would result in 2.88-meters per day being mined PER WORKING FACE BEING MINED as long as you have the manpower to mine 2 working faces simultaneously. Increasing the manpower would necessitate upgrading the camp facilities.

I’m going to guess that the adit working face will average approximately 3.5-meters by 3.5-meters over time. This means that the square meterage of the working face is 12.25 square meters. Multiplying this by 2.88-meters mined per day, means that they would mine about 35.28 “cubic meters” per day. Since the density of our granodiorite ore is 2.7 tonnes per cubic meter, this represents 95 tonnes being mined per day PER WORKING FACE BEING MINED, IF THESE INPUT VARIABLES PROVE TO BE ACCURATE. Write all input variables “in pencil” for now so that they can be quickly amended, upwards or downwards, when the accurate data becomes available. HISTORY TELLS US THESE FIGURES AND WHEN HISTORY TALKS ABOUT THINGS LIKE HISTORICAL SHIPPING GRADES AND DAILY MINING RATES, IT’S USUALLY WISE TO LISTEN. The HISTORY is very specific to this region, this type of ore, this elevation, these infrastructural components, etc. The main parameter that will differ is the role that Covid played in slowing everything down.

The historical information available on this particular project, when it comes to critical things like HISTORICAL SHIPPING GRADES and MINING PRODUCTION RATES is extremely atypical. What is different about this deal is the TIME ELEMENT in between the cessation of production by the artisanal miners and the recommencement of production by Auryn. The information regarding MINING RATES associated with Auryn drifting adits is extremely fresh. The HISTORICAL SHIPPING GRADES of the artisanal miners DOESN’T NEED TO BE FRESH. That ore didn’t go anywhere in the interim time period. What happened in the interim is that the price of gold went up 57-fold.

The beauty of commencing production at the exact same spot which had been in production for 30 years and the beauty of just having drifted about 700-meters of adits in this same infrastructural “neighborhood”, is the information provided to those wishing to make admittedly rough PROJECTIONS as to probable SHIPPING GRADES and DAILY PRODUCTION RATES. The very act of making the projections represents an EYE OPENER. We get to see how the various INPUT VARIABLES interact in real time in a mining project. WE KNOW MORE THAN WE MAY THINK WE KNOW ON THIS PARTICULAR DEAL.

What I tell the people in my group is to pretend that the artisanal miners had their last day of work YESTERDAY. Pretend that Auryn bought this project in a “TURN KEY” fashion and all they had to do was locate the DL2 Vein coming in from a different angle, corroborate the HISTORICAL SHIPPING GRADES, and construct the “PRODUCTION ADIT”. WHAT WOULD AURYN HAVE HAD TO PAY FOR THIS PROJECT WITH THE PRICE OF GOLD HOVERING NEAR $2,000 AND THE “OLD WORKINGS” PRESENT TO PROVIDE VENTILATION AND EMERGENCY EGRESS MANWAYS SO THAT THE PURCHASER COULD HARVEST THIS EXTREMELY HIGH-GRADE ORE FROM MULTIPLE LEVELS SIMULTANEOUSLY?

Since there are 2 working faces per “level” being mined, this means that 190 tonnes of ore (95 tonnes per working face multiplied by 2 working faces per level) would be mined PER DAY PER LEVEL BEING SIMULTANEOUSLY MINED. As management has noted, they plan on expanding camp and adding crews. If you multiply 190 tonnes per day per level times 250 workdays per year, you come up with 47,500 tonnes of ore being mined per year PER LEVEL BEING MINED.

Keep in mind that when drifting the Larrissa and Antonino Adits, there was only one working face available to mine at any given time. After the Antonino Adit bisected the DL2 Vein, there will now be 2 working faces to mine per level. One will be oriented towards the NNW and the other towards the SSE. When you add in workdays that are 2.6 times as long (9 hours versus 24 hours), you can see a marked increase in the amount being mined per level. This is still assuming that Auryn will use those somewhat archaic handheld “jack-leg” drills. If they were to deploy a fully-mechanized “jumbo” drill rig, these numbers would need to be adjusted upwards SIGNIFICANTLY. Management is studying the feasibility of when to add a “jumbo”. THE TIMING OF THE DEPLOYMENT OF A “JUMBO” DRILL RIG, IF THIS DOES COME TO PASS, IS THE “ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM” FROM AN ECONOMICS POINT OF VIEW.

If you take that 47,500 tonnes of ore being produced per year per level by the artisanal average HISTORICAL SHIPPING GRADE of 64 gpt gold, you’ll get 3.04 million grams of gold being produced per year. Again, this is assuming the continued use of archaic “jack-leg” drills. With there being 31.1 grams per Troy ounce of gold, this would represent 97,749 ounces of gold being produced per year PER LEVEL IN PRODUCTION. If the average SHIPPING GRADE comes in at 65.4 gpt gold, this would result in right at 100,000 ounces of gold production per year per level. If Auryn could clear $1,000 in profit per ounce produced then this would result in about $100 million in profits per year PER LEVEL. The clearing of $1,000 in profit per ounce produced is a separate discussion and involves things like the terms of offtake agreements and ALL IN SUSTAINING COSTS (AISCs) to produce an ounce of gold in concentrate form.

WHAT DOES $100 MILLION IN ANNUAL PROFITS (PERHAPS WITHIN A YEAR OR TWO???) REALLY MEAN?

Remember all of that talk about Auryn slowly “bootstrapping” their way along in order to minimize dilution of either the percentage of the project owned (100%) or the share structure? Nobody bought any “jumbo” drill rigs for $500,000 at a time when there was only one working face in action while drifting the adits. I’d guess you need 3 or 4 working faces being simultaneously mined in order to keep a “jumbo” busy. Maurizio was even willing to advance all of the cash needed to put the project all of the way into production while charging zero interest. This allowed the Auryn share structure to stay at an extremely thin 70 million shares outstanding.

That 70 million shares outstanding figure didn’t resonate a lot back during the “bootstrapping” days. With profits on the horizon, however, a theoretical $100 million in annual profits, all of a sudden represents $1.42 in EARNINGS PER SHARE. In the mining sector, the average “multiple” of EPS that corporations trade at is 30.21. This stat comes from a recent study by the Stern College of Business at NYU. That would theoretically represent a $43 share price for a corporation currently trading at 60-cents. Now you can see why I’ve been so hesitant in making these extremely rough projections. That’s just for 1 LEVEL being in production at the DL2 Vein project. This does not include the other sub levels, the other 5 main veins, the Pegaso Nero, the LDM, the various breccias, skarns and mantos, etc.

WARNING: I AM NOT SUGGESTING THAT AURYN IS GOING TO RUN TO $43 PER SHARE IN THE NEAR TERM. WHAT I AM CITING IS THE IMPORTANCE OF “RUNNING THE NUMBERS” WHEN HISTORY SERVES YOU UP ON A PLATTER ALL OF THE INFORMATION IT HAS IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE. In MINERAL ECONOMICS, the prognosis for the success of a mining project always seems to boil down to POTENTIAL SHIPPING GRADE AND POTENTIAL PRODUCTION TONNAGE. In regards to this Auryn/Medinah situation, it’s these 2 parameters that HISTORY has provided us with a great deal of insight into.

Obviously, there is a tremendous amount of work yet to be done. We don’t know how long it might take for Auryn to ramp up production to a level of 190 tonnes per day per level in production. Is it going to take a couple of quarters, a year or two, who knows? My gut feeling is that the PROFITABILITY early on, is going to be so strong, that a “jumbo” drill rig is going to be deployed much sooner than later. One of many things that I do not have a good read on is how long it might take to sink the “decline spiral” down to incorporate the next four or so levels below level 3 which is ready to go once the “ventilation/safety egress chimney” is completed. In regards to the projecting of DAILY PRODUCTION TONNAGES, I sense that many don’t realize just how difficult things were back when the Covid pandemic was in full force.

9 Likes

Thanks for this informative post. Im assuming the obvious objective is to first maximize production at the DL. What do you think the next logical step would be? Perhaps putting the Caren into production or start funding a drill program at the PN?

2 Likes

Funny, the little Excel spreadsheet I’ve developed over the years of reading Brecciaboy’s stuff comes to just about the same conclusions - given the parameters he cites.

I wonder what the terms of typical offtake agreements are - what kind of cut is the average we have to give to them? Seems like maybe only a few percentage points?

That being said, the following link indicates that the benefits from execution of an offtake agreement can greatly affect the share price (benefits = automatic market, loan facility to ramp-up production, etc.). At the current depressed share price, would a rational person buy more MDMN? I actually find myself considering this. Hmmm …

https://investingnews.com/daily/resource-investing/precious-metals-investing/gold-investing/offtake-agreements-as-alternative-financing-options/

And oh, by the way, we sure are FORTUNATE to have the likes of Brecciaboy around here - very grateful for him, and others too! If we all go away with just a fraction of the speculated profits, we’ll at least be able to say we have substantive and computational metrics at hand - which he has been patient enough to re-hash over and over again for us laymen.

5 Likes

I agree. Especially like the $43 a share. I will be a 2- millionaire!!!

2 Likes