Auryn/Medinah 2025 1st half General Discussion

Thanks BB. I’m grateful that you share your extensive geological/mining knowledge to eliminate some confusion generated in this forum. You make great points regarding Maurizio’s ‘bootstrapping’ approach, which is what naysayers here criticize the most. By raising capital to promote & develop the mine from their perspective, MC would likely lose his majority percentage of ownership. Bootstrapping may take longer, but it allows MC to front his personal funding without charging interest, among other benefits.

As you describe the differences, it’s easy to see how other “normal” advances would only increase dilution of our shares, as well as our potential for profit…… *(personality comment edited out by mod)

1 Like

(Personality comments edited out by mod)

Even raising $5M (8 years ago) ago would have created minimal dilution and allowed the company to advance by attracting investors with an actual resource. While holding onto 70M shares over the duration is great, on the surface, the cost has been a decade of lost opportunities as the project was not investable. The cost has been a bleeding share price and several major pivots on a mining decision across several different assets in the portfolio. The cost has been existential shifts on decisions to produce and finding the DL vein over four times. Avoiding dilution is a BIG deal but its equally important to understand the costs of doing so. There are a whole lot of investors who’ve been involved for over 30 years, many no longer with us, that would have tolerated some dilution in exchange for an earlier monetization of this mountain. This is undeniable.

Even as recently as a year ago Maurizio was aggresively trying to raise $$ through the issuance of shares but there were no takers. If BB actually spoke to Maurizio in a meaningful way, he would have known this. If BB actually spoke to Maurizio there is no way he could have been so off on all of his predictions. He would not have been doing cartwheels about “production” when the mine was on care and maintenaces. Nor would he have dedicated pages of analysis on a $5,000 per ton economic impact. Unforfortunately, this story will, again, play out with a lot more twists and turns with the “villain” being vindicated.

The concept of “bootrapping” is admirable. My reference to this term was specific to maintaining a very strict budget on bringing the mine into production. Lack of mechanization and the inability to mine in volume brings the ASIC way up. Stracon may be able to assist on this but it will come at a very high cost. I certainly would not call a $4M debt financing with a $20M obligation/overhange “going it alone” but nobody can say without certainty b/c no details have been provided. Issuing shares would have been preferrable (just ask Maurizio) but this is the current reality and I commend the guy for continuing to charge ahead.

Those with patience will see AUMC in production at some point. I have little doubt. Doing so profitability and consistently, while following mineralization blindly (see: no dilution) will be the “second act.” I genuinely wish him ultimate success.

2 Likes

Doc, thank you for your time and your knowledge!

3 Likes

I’ve had several inquiries through the back channels as to what I think of the new Chilean “Small Producer’s Mining Statute” and what it means to a company like Auryn/Medinah. Below is a compilation from a couple of AI overviews of the topic:

“AI Overview

In Chile, small minerals producers are subject to the same general mining laws as larger producers, which include the

Chilean Constitution, the Constitutional Organic Law on Mining Concessions, and the Mining Code. However, the Chilean government has implemented specific provisions and initiatives to support and promote small-scale mining operations by imposing lighter regulatory burdens.

Key Aspects Relevant to “Small Mineral Producers”:

Reduced Mining Fee: Small-scale producers may be eligible for a reduced rate of the annual mining concession fee.

Reduced Patent Rates: Law No. 21649, enacted in December 2023, established conditions for mining properties, especially relevant to small-scale mining, to qualify for reduced patent rates. These conditions may include demonstrating effective mining work, obtaining favorable environmental qualification resolutions, and complying with mining safety regulations.

Simplified Permit Process: The Ministry of Mining, in collaboration with the National Service of Geology and Mining (Sernageomin), has launched a new benefit under the updated Mining Code Regulation, allowing individuals and companies to apply for a reduced mining concession fee, thereby easing compliance requirements for small-scale miners. The permitting process has been streamlined for the smaller miners that qualify as “small mineral producers”.

Taxation: Small artisanal miners may be subject to a single tax with a progressive rate depending on the price of the mineral.

Investment and Finance: While access to financing can be challenging for small-scale operations, there are efforts to develop a suitable local securities market for mining, such as the Bolsa Venture initiative, which is focused on providing venture capital to small and medium-sized mining companies.

In summary, while the core mining legal framework applies to all producers, the Chilean government has implemented measures within that framework to specifically support and facilitate the operations of small minerals producers. These measures include reduced fees, simplified permit processes, and tailored tax regulations.”

About all I can add is the following:

In Chile, mega-majors like Codelco have been criticized for decades for “inventorying/hoarding” prospective mining concessions and never doing any work on them. The Chilean Congress finally had enough and starting fining Codelco for tying down concessions with no intent to develop them. The Chilean Congress made an effort to attract junior mineral explorers from especially the U.S., Canada, and Australia, to tie down some of these concessions and go to work on them. They essentially “bribed” these junior explorers by promising to cut the fees, tax rates, and permitting requirements for these juniors if they qualified as “Small Minerals Producers” willing to limit production to 1,000 tonnes per month per adit being mined. The big attraction involved the mandated streamlining of PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS ESPECIALLY THOSE RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS. Chile’s Environmental Authority, the SEIA, has been told to lay off on these “Small Minerals Producers“ when it comes to what many think of as overly burdensome environmental requirements that take an inordinate amount of time and money to comply with.

This “bribe” was very generous for the Auryn’s of the world. As it was explained to me, the goal is to now get as many areas of the overall Mining District permitted and into production.

The Chilean government still wants these “Small Producers” to grow and morph into “mid-tier” miners that produce far in excess of that 1,000 TPM per adit. As I understand it, the favorable tax rates will lessen as these once “Small Producers” grow up and hopefully morph into “mid-tier” miners. The new statute became effective on 1/1/24. As it was explained to me, any previously mined and stockpiled ore was to be “grandfathered in”.

Recently the tax rates on the “mega-copper producers” has gone up in order to offset the savings given to the “Small Producers”.

4 Likes

All VERY beneficial, as you say to small miners, like Auryn - which by the way is ALREADY in production, since the stockpile is grandfathered in. Invaluable information - thank you.

1 Like

Your recent post reminded me of the possibilities of how multiple ramping over different sections could be employed. In a previous post, I showed a single access ramp example of using a declining spiral method to access ore.

BB, your excellent video reference showed one of a number of possibilities that could be employed and merits additional reviewing:

I notice the depth to which the ramps extend downwards is very adaptable in following a deposit to depth. I envision similar ramping would work for the Fortuna mine at various and multiple adit entrances as horizontal extensions are also followed. Veins may not only extend vertically, but may extend in hi-grade zones horizontally and may even be stacked. The Don Luis Vein system is only one area of a much larger District Deposit. A specific variation of “sub level stoping” is termed shrinkage stope mining:

AI: “Shrinkage stope mining is a technique used in underground mining for extracting narrow, steeply dipping gold and silver veins. It involves blasting the ore in horizontal slices and leaving the broken ore in the stope to provide support for the walls and a working platform for miners. This method is particularly suitable for narrow, high-grade veins where selective mining is necessary.”

I’m looking forward to seeing multiple smaller 1000 tpm adits open that will keep the new mill continuously fed with high head grade ore mined in the most efficient way possible. The hire of world-class mine operator Ashmore-Stracon-Dumas as mining operator says what I need to know. MC aims to move forward without looking behind.
EZ

5 Likes

Hi EZ,

Maurizio has worked closely with a Professor of Mining Engineering at San Sebastian University name de la Tiero (spelling?). He was the head of Underground Operations at El Penon for Yamana Gold. In an interview, he suggested using the El Penon Mine and Mining District as a template for where he thought the ADL Mining District was headed. Here is a link to a description of El Penon. It is one of the most prolific gold and silver mines in Chile:

https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/17a3902b-4efd-476c-958c-0f4795d7f773

Both the ADL and El Penon feature about 7 Main Veins that mostly run in parallel from north to south. The ADL has one, the Merlin 3, that fortunately runs from east to west and links sever of Auryn’s veins together. One of Auryn’s press releases made a while back cited that all of the ADL veins are “INTER-RELATED”.

If you picture a gigantic underlying magma chamber way down deep with magma and hydrothermal fluids running at about 3,000-degrees Centigrade. Periodically, over the course of 91 million years, this magma chamber had pressure build-ups that ruptured the roof/”carapace” of the magma chamber.

Now picture about 7 vertical faults/cracks in the rock immediately above the magma chamber. The fluids are very buoyant and the insanely high pressures and temperatures drive the metal-bearing hydrothermal fluids upwards where they fill up the 7 vertical faults/cracks, the fluids then cool, and solidify into “veins”. The east to west oriented Merlin 3 Vein allows the fluids to intermix with the various north to south oriented veins. What you’re left with is a “Homogenous Vein Set” with similar metal constituents, grades, widths, rock types, gangue types, etc.

The similarities make it so that when you’ve seen one, perhaps you’ve pretty much seen them all. When in the magma chamber, the magma, the gases, and the liquids have an opportunity to intermix and make the hydrothermal fluids “homogenous”. This saves a lot of money in needing to drill out all of the various 7 veins individually. The work of the artisanal miners at the DL2 Vein taught the geoscientists a tremendous amount about the DL2 Vein and hence probably a lot about the rest of the veins. The exhaustive trenching program performed by Auryn filled in a lot of the blanks and confirmed the “homogenous” nature of the various veins.

We knew that the grades and widths of the various levels mined by the artisanal miners (levels0,1, and 2) were BOTH improving with depth. THE MOMENT OF TRUTH CAME WHEN THE ANTONINO ADIT INTERSECTED THE DL2 VEIN AT THE NEW “LEVEL 3” OF THE MINE ABOUT 30-METERS BELOW LEVEL 2. THE GRADES WITHIN THE DL2 VEIN FOUND AT THIS INTERSECTION POINT (ranging from 150 gpt gold to 164 gpt gold whereas the artisanal miners were averaging 64 gpt gold) TOTALLY BLEW AWAY THE GRADES FROM THE “OLD WORKS” AT LEVELS 0,1, AND 2.

From that point on, tons of further testing was done that corroborated the stellar grades and Auryn hasn’t looked back since. I’m not talking about the share prices of Medinah and Auryn, but more so the future net present value of the assets.

In mining, you need to “ACCESS” the ore in order to mine it. The options are a vertical shaft or a horizontal “adit” (tunnel with one opening to the outside). Maurizio and his team went with the horizontal adit. The Antonino Adit used to be an “exploration adit”, now it’s an access and production adit. As we’ve recently learned, the Auryn and Ashmore/Stracon engineers opted to go with a “SUB LEVEL STOPING” approach to mining. This is a “big boy” mining approach to very large deposits that are inclined fairly steeply and whose borders are easy to distinguish.

This approach involves simultaneously mining at several different horizontal levels. The miners in the upper adits drill long holes into the floor of their adit and the miners in the lower adits drill out the ceilings/”backs” of the lower adit. The drill holes are filled with ANFO and kaboom, the fractured ore falls by gravity into the lower adit where it is scooped up usually by “LOAD, HAUL, DUMP” (LHD) trucks. The resultant empty “STOPES” are then often “back-filled” with the tailings/discards from the froth flotation plant in order to stabilize the mountain. At the end of the day the 7 Main Veins will probably have a bunch of “cross-cuts” linking them together like you see at El Penon.

We’re all looking for reliable sources of information. Trust the guys like Professor de la Tiero who ran the underground operations for Yamana at El Penon after Yamana bought out Meridian Gold that made the initial discovery. Trust the hiring of a major mine developers like Robert Mayne-Nichols who Auryn just hired as the new “General Manager”. He has been associated with mega-mines like Los Pelambres and Collahuasi in Chile. Trust the Ashmore/Stracons of the world that act as “mine operator” for 51 different mines in 4 countries. Trust the Isac Bursteins of the world who was appointed to the Auryn BOD a year or two ago. He heads up Hochschild’s “Business Development” department. Watch some of his keynote addresses to various worldwide mining and banking forums. He is considered one of the premier “deal cutters” in all of South America. You just don’t put a team like that together for the heck of it.

The subdivision of Ashmore/Stracon that will be working closest with us is called Ameco, SA. Stracon recently acquired them from one of the largest engineering firms in the world known as Fluor. They specialize in “EPCM”, which stands for Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management.

We need to keep in mind that Maurizio isn’t exactly an “over-communicator”. He hates PROMOTION. He puts out the news in a professional manner and he thinks that it’s up to us to do a little due diligence and put the puzzle pieces together.

5 Likes

Another credible source is Dr. Helmut Mischo from Freiberg University in Germany. He has authored over 184 scientific papers specializing in underground mining methods. He and some of his fellow professors and grad students spent quite a bit of time at the ADL. His comment was that once the new froth flotation plant is dialed-in, the ramping up of production by Auryn will be extremely straight forward and predictable.

4 Likes

1 Like

I remember that professor from San Sebastien University saying exactly what BB quoted him as saying - El Penon is very comparable to the ADL’s veins. Thanks for reminding me, BB! And thanks for all the scholarly work above - your 45 years of experience shows and is very helpful to us laymen!

5 Likes

Yes, we’re all looking for reliable sources of information. Here’s a visual of what you are describing at the El Peñón Gold-Silver Mine, Antofagasta Region, Chile (from NI 43-101 Technical Report):

Also, as you describe the 7 vertical North to South oriented veins intersecting the East to West
oriented Merlin 3 vein, a vivid mental picture is formed. A preliminary mine plan visualization might look very similar to this schematic from the El Peñón Gold-Silver Mine Technical Report with many spiral declines forming off the Merlin Vein. Imagine each of the 7 vein declines forming a separate 1000 TPM small mining concession with an advance decline connected to the surface for ore haulage.

(https://panamericansilver.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Pan-American-Silver-El-Penon-NI-43-101-2024-FINAL-compressed.pdf)

Thanks BB. The information you’ve been providing sure opens many possibilities for the future development of the ADL.
EZ

5 Likes

FROM THE APRIL 2025 UPDATE:

“Construction of the Flotation Plant and associated facilities begins this month, April 2025. We anticipate initial plant operations in early Q3 2025, allowing us to conduct thorough testing and optimization of the mill using ore extracted from our ongoing operations. This period of operational testing and fine-tuning will generate measurable economic value and ensure the plant is fully optimized ahead of obtaining complete operational permitting, expected later in the third quarter of 2025”

To be clear, the Company said they anticipate initial plant operations in early Q3 and obtaining complete operational permitting by later in the Q3.

Read this closely.

“Anticipate” =

“Anticipate” does not mean etched in stone.

AURYN is well on its way to being a producer - it will happen … in a non-traditional way. Good.

2 Likes

Doc, I’ve been thinking about this. As much as you like writing and have been here since the beginning, why don’t you write a book detailing all of the ups and downs of the ADL . This would give credit to the current ownership but also show in detail what a miracle it was that the mine actual began producing. Of course, you’ll need to leave a chapter or two for the end results. Seriously, I think you are one of a few that has the experience and full knowledge of what really happened. And, you can’t leave out the crook.

4 Likes

Hi MrB,

I don’t follow the Auryn “X/twitter” feed very much, but I just noticed that the key part of the froth flotation plant, the ball mill and gyratory/cone crusher, arrived in Santiago, from Lima-based COMESA, on April 17 and was delivered to the ADL plateau on or about 4/24 or about 9 weeks ago. Maurizio has missed a couple of deadlines over the years, and I have a feeling his projected timeframe had a little bit of “under promise and over deliver” built into it.

On “X” there also was a picture of Auryn’s “Leadership Team” on-site inspecting the civil engineering prep job prior to the official start of “construction”. It was dated April 10, 2025. The other parts of the FF plant include the “cells” and “columns” and a bunch of other goodies that may or may not be on-site as we speak.

The ball mill is 6 feet wide and 8 feet long. The average “particle size” for FF plants is somewhere around 75 microns, which is less than a grain of sand. The engineers will tinker with the particle size that leads to the maximum recovery rate for the FF plant. I suppose that the 20,000 tonnes of stockpiled ore could be run through the ball mill prior to the FF plant being fully commissioned, but I don’t know that to be a fact. Both the ball mill and the FF plant will have a nameplate “throughput” rating. The original throughput rating for the FF plant was to be 100 tonnes per day but then Auryn ordered some other “individual cells” and/or “columns” that might increase that to a higher level.

People should realize that at the current price of gold, Auryn could make a great deal of money at a 100 tonnes per day “throughput” rate, but this “throughput” rate is miniscule compared to where it might be down the road. At this stage, the goal is to make some serious money while getting the FF plant “dialed in”. Then later you add on more “cells” and “columns” in a “bolt on” fashion. The engineers will have built in plenty of room for adding on capacity for later on. A “gravity circuit”, mainly for the oxides, will also probably be added on in due time.

The good thing about just going into production is knowing that the initial production rates are PREDICTABLY going to be ramped up quite a bit. In mining, it’s referred to as generating a “dynamic growth profile”. As production ensues, the “cost of capital” drops a bunch, so you don’t want to build a gigantic expensive ore processing facility right from the get-go, especially if you have to sell shares to fund it. The FREE CASH FLOW generated right from the beginning will allow Auryn to ramp up production at a certain rate. Since the price of gold is so high, I’m going to guess that Maurizio and Ashmore/Stacon are going to move heaven and earth to RAPIDLY ramp up production. Recall how Dr. Mischo from Germany predicted a robust ramp up period once the FF plant is “dialed in”.

Since Ashmore/Stracon is acting both as the financier and the “mine operator”, they’ll have a front row seat on operations. Ashmore manages $65 billion in investments in the “emerging markets”. They need to find high-grade projects that can generate a significant “return on equity” for them. Auryn is about to have LEVERAGE up the cazoo and they might need capital to maximize that LEVERAGE and capture the “leverage beta”. “MECHANIZATION LEVERAGE” is a very powerful phenomenon. Adding one “jumbo drill rig” could increase the mining rate of Auryn’s miners a significant percentage, but it never made financial sense, up until now, to go out and buy one.

For the young “junior producers”, once the free cash flow starts flowing, all kinds of things tend to occur in a relatively short time span. The analogy you hear is that the junior explorers/developers are all trying to gain traction while essentially operating in quicksand. Once one goes into high-grade production, especially if the POG is high, it’s as if somebody reached into the quicksand pit and pulled them out and placed them onto the German autobahn.

This is a very PREDICTABLE phenomenon which is why on the “LASSONDE CURVE” the sweet spot for an investment is right as the about to become “junior producer” enters into the “construction phase” of their project. You don’t start construction until you have certainty you can complete construction. When things like ball mills and gyratory/cone crushers start arriving on-site, and the work camp has been recently completed, then you can have a pretty high certainty level that things are about to start.

Almost all mines have an FF circuit to process the “sulfides” which are famous for being “refractory” or in need of special techniques, like froth flotation, to harvest the gold. The “oxides”, that exist closer to the surface, are often initially processed via “gravity” methodologies.

The “oxides” tend to be easier to process but the “sulfides” tend to be much more numerous in a deposit and of much higher grade. So, there’s a trade-off. Rob Cinits of ACA Howe told me once, a long time ago, that the reason the vein grades at the ADL are so high is that there is a lot of a certain “sulfide” present known as “arsenopyrite”, which is known as nature’s “gold magnet”. Gold particles within hydrothermal fluids tend to make a beeline straight to any nearby arsenopyrite molecules.

In the DL2 Vein, the arsenopyrite/gold complexes tend to exist just inside the lateral boundaries of the vein on each side of the vein near the bordering wall rock. This area is known as the “selvage” of the vein and at the ADL Mining District there tends to be a lot of “sericite” (mica) in this area.

A lot of investors in this sector get hung up on the “number of ounces produced annually” metric. IMO, Auryn is going to be a very low-cost producer per ounce of gold produced. The metric you want to follow is “net profits” or free cash flow.

Think about it, if a miner produces 500,000 ounces per year at break-even costs, who cares? You want to multiply the number of ounces produced annually by the “marginal profit” per ounce produced. The “marginal profit” per ounce produced is going to be close to the price of gold minus the ALL IN SUSTAINING COST (AISC) to produce each of those ounces.

Where Auryn has a distinct “competitive economic advantage” is that they’re mining a “Vein Set” of pretty much “homogenous” veins. They don’t need to fully drill out those veins in order to get an idea of what is likely to be contained therein. The work of the artisanal miners as well as the exhaustive surface trenching program that Auryn executed in 2016, told management what they needed to know.

A major miner operating an open pit (non-vein deposit) that produces let’s say 500,000 ounces per year, pretty much has to take a big chunk of the annual profits and undertake an extremely expensive diamond drill program IN ORDER TO BLOCK OUT ANOTHER 500,000 OUNCES TO REPLACE THAT WHICH IT JUST MINED. These are referred to as “SUSTAINING CAPITAL EXPENDITURES” and they are one of the ten or so subdivisions of ALL IN SUSTAINING COSTS. Open pits aren’t “homogenous” and you can’t assume anything. Institutional investors will insist that the majors annually replace the ounces they just mined. They want to keep the pipeline full.

Auryn doesn’t have to play that game. At the ADL Mining District, there are adits and prior workings all over the place within those veins where the geoscientists can go in and simply sample the adit walls. This provides 10-times the information that a drill hole can. “HOMOGENEITY” represents INEXPENSIVE PREDICTABILITY.

4 Likes

already hedging?? LOL

Nah, just trying to help those with minimal reading comprehension skills up front.
Speaking of hedging … never mind.

3 Likes

Per BB:

“People should realize that at the current price of gold, Auryn could make a great deal of money at a 100 tonnes per day “throughput” rate, but this “throughput” rate is miniscule compared to where it might be down the road.”

I was reading up on the El Penon mine last night and saw that they plan on finishing up production in 2031 (or thereabouts) - they started mining ca. the year 2000, so basically a 30-year mine life. Interestingly, I saw that they are actually producing at the rate of about 4,000+ tonnes per day. So, yes, 100 tonnes per day, even though very profitable for us, is nothing - if we can get up to 500 or 1,000 tonners per day, we’ll be sitting real pretty

2 Likes

AISC = Cash Costs + Sustaining Capital + Exploration Expenses + G&A Expenses

So, this seems to mean that the (up to) $20 Million deal with Ameco Chile SpA should be included in the AISC - and the AISC ends up being whatever it is on a computational basis. In other words, this will be an operating expense and not a debt.

Which leaves us with the following debts that need to be paid:
(1) the balance of MC’s interest-free loan (thank you, sir! - I will remember that).
(2) the $4 Million loan at SOFA + 400 basis points from Strategic Investments SAC

Are there more debts I’m not remembering?

The question is the planning of how/when these latter amounts will be paid; i.e. whether they will be paid first, versus concurrently with dividends. If it’s the latter, then a higher share price could trigger lots of goodies, like an increased share price and potentially better loan terms for expansion.

1 Like

Hi MrB,

Thanks for your explanation of ALL IN SUSTAINING COSTS (AISCs) but it goes a lot deeper than that. The first reality is that by far and away, the largest determinant of AISC is GRADE. In mining, the oldest axiom of all is that “GRADE IS EVERYTHING” and it really is. Why? It’s because profits are everything and GRADES determine the AISC (per ounce) and the AISC determines the MARGINAL PROFIT (per ounce) to produce each ounce of gold that is produced. In simplified terms, the MARGINAL PROFIT per ounce produced is basically equal to the price of gold minus the AISC.

We’ve been dealing with the concept of AISC since 2013 when the World Gold Council pretty much mandated that all “COSTS” for mining firms be reported on a “PER OUNCE” basis and the AISC should include SUSTAINING CAPITAL EXPENDITURES especially for the majors that need to take their annual profit and first of all drill out as many new ounces of MINERAL RESERVES/MINERAL RESOURCES to match the number of ounces of gold they just produced in the prior year. Auryn will never be forced to do this which is partly why their AISC (per ounce) is so low. They’re mining a somewhat “homogenous” VEIN SET of closely linked parallel veins with similar grades, widths, gangue components, etc. Diamond drilling is extremely expensive.

As mentioned, the primary determinant of AISC is GRADE. Extremely high-grade deposits, by definition, have extremely low AISC’s. Why is this? It’s because AISC is always reported on a “PER OUNCE” of gold basis.

Let’s look at the line-item entry for AISCs known as TRANSPORTATION COSTS. Let’s assume that it costs about $500 to ship a 20-tonne truckload of ore to the smelter or ore processing facility. The AISC TRANSPORTATION COST (per ounce transported) will be $500 divided by the number of ounces of gold in that truckload.

The average underground miner is mining 4.18 gpt gold worldwide. Since there are 31.1 grams in each Troy ounce of gold, this means that this 4.18 gpt figure converts into .134 ounces per tonne. Therefore a 20-tonne truckload of this ore would contain 2.68 ounces of gold (20-times .134). The AISC TRAANSPORTATION COST (per ounce transported) would therefore be $500 divided by 2.68 ounces per truckload or $186 per ounce for the miner mining “average grade” ore.

Let’s say that Auryn is mining 15.5 gpt gold which is one half ounce per tonne. This is about 4-times the average. If Auryn were shipping raw ore, each truckload of ore would have about 10 ounces of gold (20 tonnes times one half ounce per tonne) or about 3.7-times as many ounces as the average miner and therefore Auryn’s AISC TRANSPORTATION COST (per ounce transported) would be right at $50 per ounce transported or about one-fourth of that of the other miner JUST DUE TO GRADE ALONE.

BUT, Auryn is not going to be TRANSPORTING raw ore. They’re going to first froth float that raw ore and convert the grade from perhaps 15.5 gpt (one half ounce per tonne) to somewhere around 5-times that amount or, let’s say, 2.5 ounces per tonne. This means that a 20-tonne truckload will contain about 50 ounces of gold. Their AISC TRANSPORTATION COST (again per ounce transported) is going to be somewhere around $500 per truckload divided by 50 ounces per truckload is about $10 per ounce transported. This is as opposed to the “average miner” paying $186 per ounce transported. Why such a stark difference? Auryn’s ore started out about 3.7-times richer and then that got magnified another 5-fold because Auryn was smart enough and fortunate enough, to build their own FF plant. Auryn will not be transporting raw ore, they’re going to be TRANSPORTING a highly-enriched “float concentrate”.

Now you can appreciate why “GRADE IS EVERYTHING” whether it be the grade of the ore you mine or the grade of the “float concentrate” you TRANSPORT. HAVING NOT ONLY HIGH-GRADE ORE TO START WITH BUT ALSO YOUR OWN FF PLANT TO FURTHER CONCENTRATE IT, DRIVES DOWN YOUR AISC MARKEDLY. THIS DRIVES UP YOUR “MARGINAL PROFIT” PER OUNCE PRODUCED MARKEDLY. THIS DRIVES UP YOUR TOTAL ANNUAL PROFITS MARKEDLY. THE FACT THAT AURYN ONLY HAS 70 MILLION SHARES OUTSTANDING MEANS THAT THEIR “EARNINGS PER SHARE” WILL BE DRIVEN UP MARKEDLY. SINCE MINING STOCKS TRADE AT AN AVERAGE “MULTIPLE” OF 31 TIMES EPS, THIS MEANS THAT THE SHARE PRICE SHOULD BE DRIVEN UP MARKEDLY.

SINCE “TOTAL PROFITS” EQUALS THE NUMBER OF OUNCES PRODUCED ANNUALLY TIMES THE SOMEWHAT SUPERCHARGED “MARGINAL PROFIT” PER OUNCE FIGURE (due to high-grade raw ore plus your own FF plant) IMAGINE THE INCENTIVE FOR AURYN AND ASHMORE/STRACON TO AGGRESSIVELY RAMP UP THE NUMBER OF OUNCES PRODUCED ANNUALLY IN ORDER TO LEVERAGE THIS SITUATION.

Now let’s go back to what Mr. B just taught you about AISC and relate it to Auryn/Medinah specifically. He said that AISC=CASH COSTS+SUSTAINING CAPITAL+EXPLORATION EXPENSE+ GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.

In regard to CASH COSTS: Auryn’s CASH COSTS like on-site mining costs and TRANSPORTATION COSTS are going to be dirt cheap because of grades and having their own FF plant.

In regard to SUSTAINING COSTS like the need for the miners of open pits to constantly take the profits and drill out more ounces of MR/MR in order to replace the ounces they mine annually, Auryn’s not going to have to do that. They’re mining veins within “Homogenous Vein Sets” that are much more predictable than open pit “disseminated” deposits.

In regard to EXPLORATION EXPENSES: Auryn has 8 Main Veins that they are going to be mining. This will keep them plenty busy for decades to come.

In regard to GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES: Maurizio is extremely frugal, and he tosses around nickels like manhole covers.

If I were Maurizio and I owned 62% of Auryn’s shares, I’d probably convert Auryn into an ATM machine that spins out nonstop cash dividends at the same time it aggressively ramped up production. Nobody knows how long the price of gold is going to be trading at these levels so the ramping up process needs to be aggressive.

3 Likes

Hi BB. While its true that, in the absence of a mine/exploration plan, those costs will not be included in the ASIC, are there any negative ramifications? You like to reference a sector mutiple P/E of 30. While no legitimate investor in the mining sector uses this metric to assess value it is important to understand how its applied. If company ABC is making $10 today, with a P/E of 30 it would be trading with a $300 market cap. Investors would be making an investment based on expectations that ABC could earn that $10 each year for the next 30 years. The ONLY way to make that prediction would be based on a confidence level of a 30 year mine life. There may only be 15 years based on defined resources and some sort of probability, based on the mineralization, that another 15 years would be discovered. Most mining companies spend the time and money on exploration efforts so that the continue to be credited by the market/investors.

There’s the old saying “you can’t have your cake an eat it too.” In other words, you can embrace the lack of dilution (let’s just forget about the debt) that was acheived b/c AUMC decided to avoid all of the steps that most mining companies take to properly delineate an asset. But it seems a bit naive to then assume that you still get the benefits. The market will never assign a rich valuation to AUMC b/c there is no visibility on the mine life. Even if they make $20M next year, investors can’t assume they will be able to do the same the following year (assigning a multiple becomes impossible). Of equal importance, in the absence of a mine plan, the market will never assign a premium valuation to a company that is chaising a vein and relying on trench samples (highly discounted, just check) or historical mining. Stated differently, the risk profile of AUMC’s mining efforts is considerably more elevated b/c they don’t have the same clarity on the direction nor grade of the mineralization.

You can praise the 70M shares all you want but its a bit disengenous to ignore the consequences of not spening enough money on the project to make the stock investable. The obvious caveat to this would be their ability to simply buy back shares and issue dividends (if they become profitable and pay off their debt). In this case, the share price becomes pretty much meaningless.

I’m happy to debate the ASIC and cash flow projections based on actual case studies at a later date. But, throwing out price targets by comping median P/Es across the sector for companies who did suffer the dilution of drilling out resources, developing feasibility studies/mining places, when AUMC doesn’t have any of the “normal” underpinning feels like an apples to oranges exercise.

2 Likes