Auryn/Medinah 2026 1st half General Discussion

Hi EZ,

This really is the most complicated yet refreshing set of circumstances I’ve seen in 44 years worth of studying junior miners and mineral deposits. From the MINERAL ECONOMICS point of view, I could easily see Auryn’s annual earnings at that $70 million/$1 EARNINGS PER SHARE within one to three years. Based on a 100 Tonnes per day initial throughput of the FF plant, an AISC of $1,000, an average grade of just 15.5 gpt (0.5 OPT), a recovery rate of 80%, 330 workdays per work year, 33,000 tonnes per year throughput (330 days times 100 TPD), 16,500 “contained ounces” in throughput, 13,200 “recovered ounces” after factoring in the 80% recovery rate, a POG of $5,000 per ounce, a “MARGINAL PROFIT” of about $4,000 per ounce, etc. you get a pre-tax income of $57 million. Think of it as “Heinz 57” in order to remember it.

Within 1 to 3 years, I’d guess the daily throughput will be somewhere around 150 TPD some of which might be associated with an oxide circuit/ gravity plant for the oxide ore especially at the Merlin 1 Vein where they found 26.9 gpt RIGHT AT SURFACE (volume weighted average-which is the accurate way to gauge averages). This ore was already deemed recoverable by a Sepro/Falconer (centrifuge) system at over 90% (free-milling coarse grained ore). At 150 TPD you need to multiply that $57 million pre-tax figure by a little over 1.5 because some of the costs are fixed. This puts the pre-tax income at a little over $85 million per year. You tell me where’s that going to be in Year #5 or #6.

So far we’re only talking about the 7 Main Veins. When you factor in the PN, the LDM, the breccias, the skarns, the 24 new veins intersected in the Antonino Adit recently, etc., where does that put you? The plant is probably good for perhaps 30 years or so. At 150 TPD, the ore in the 7 Main Veins will last for many decades.

Markets are “forward looking”, they can process this information once exposed to it. That 60,000 tonnes of ore already stockpiled will guarantee that the plant will never run out of “feed”. Management will constantly be feeding in the highest grade ore available as they go. This will keep upward pressure on the “AVERAGE GRADE”. Some of those 60,000 Tonnes is comprised of the 70 gpt material that Auryn mined “DIRECTLY FROM THE VEIN WITH MINIMAL DILUTION”. Auryn already completed that 66-meter ore bypass from level 3 (1,847 meters above sea level elevation) to the Fortuna 1,913 level at the 1,913 meter elevation level. This sets up the “sub-level stoping” aspect of the project. The ore mined from the intervening levels will be thrown into that ore bypass and it will come crashing down to level 3 where it will be removed. The beauty of SLS is that you can simultaneously mine from a bunch of different horizontal levels.

With production soon to be coming from 2 operating sites at the Caren Mine (Merlin 1 Vein) and 2 operating sites at the Fortuna 1,913, plus the 1,000 TPD already being mined at the Fortuna level 3, you’re going to overwhelm any 100 to 150 TPD plant. The big mystery is how is management going to ramp up production to perhaps 150 to 200 TPD. Dr. Mischo told us that once the FF plant is “dialed-in”, the ramping up process will be very “straightforward”. Are we talking an oxide circuit with centrifuges? Additional Denver/Serrano cells? Additional column flotation facilities? The thing to keep an eye on is some forward guidance on the throughput rate in Tonnes per day through time. Each 100 TPD might equate to about a pre-tax income of $57 million. Don’t forget that 60,000 Tonnes already stockpiled. If the plant gets overwhelmed might Auryn “DIRECT SHIP” some ore to Enami’s smelters or to Chinese smelters?

You don’t need huge daily throughput rates in order to make a fortune with gold at over $5,000 if every 100 TPD makes you somewhere around $57 million (once the FF plant is dialed-in). What people need to recognize is that a 100 TPD initial throughput rate is microscopic in comparison to where that number might be in “X” number of quarters or years.

What’s interesting is how we now look at $5,000 per ounce gold and kind of go “Ho hum”. Are you kidding me, $5,000 per ounce gold and we’re about to start producing it. A 1-ounce Krugerrand is a little bit larger than a quarter. That’s now worth $5,000? The artisanal miners of the ADL were averaging 64 gpt gold in an area up higher in the vein structure with noticeably lower grades than where we’re mining. The POG back then was $35 per ounce.

7 Likes

Why would the shares outstanding affect what multiple an investor is willing to pay? This logic is pretty consistent with the rest of your assertions. Either way, if a company with a billion shares is trading at at 30x multiple (laughable for a single asset producer, absurd for a producer with no resource) and a company with 70 million shares is trading at a 30x multiple there’s no difference. In fact, any sophisticated investor would much prefer to buy the company with a billion shares outstanding (assuming all else is equal) b/c the liquidity profile would be significantly better. Sophisticated investors are way less likely to establish a position in a company with a miniscule float (7 million shares) vs. one where they can buy and sell without moving the market. This is very basic, investor 101 type stuff.

Making a claim that a project with a pilot scale plant and no resource is “low risk” is interesting.

How does one calculate an NPV without having a good handle on life of mine? You need to plug in multiple years of production to attain that number. Interesting.

Claiming that Auryn has “provided evidence” of more than two million ounces isn’t interesting, it’s insane. That’s exactly why 43-101s exists. So that crazy guestimates don’t find their way into public markets. This is no different than claiming/asserting that AUMC has pursued an exploration and development phase to de-risk the mine plan. This never happened. What did happen? After AUMC was unable to issue many millions of shares to finance a little plant they entered into a debt-service agreement (of which investors have no details) to build a plant. There’s no doubt that the repayment of this debt is actually a lower risk scenario with gold prices at this level. As long as they can process the higher grade stockpile without running into commissioning issues the debt should be covered. The equity, on the other hand, is an unknown.

Yes, the share structure is tight and the price of gold is phenomenal. Unfortunately, those two variables, do not suffice for an investment thesis. This may be why this “huge de-risking/permitting” milestone resulted in $5k of trading today. I think we can all appreciate your longstanding view that the market just doesn’t get it (for 30 years) but I would say that a $150M market cap, despite no real volume, is a small victory upon itself. There’s no outcome that will make up for the past despite any and all efforts to hype the future. Enjoy the ride today without getting into the same pattern of setting unrealistic expectations for yourself and others (they don’t know any better) and poor Maurizio. Heinz 57 today, the beach chair ATM analogy 15 years prior, WCD the decade before, etc, etc. Have you ever cross referenced your analysis with his internal projections/expectations? (that’s a rhetorical question).

Only suprising if correct. That was when CDCH was trading at its previous high of 27 cents. I still remember the paper profits in my account that day and then kicking myself for the next 24 months for not selling.

Remember the 100 for 1 reverse stock split that occurred in 2018? You can actually see the volume spike on your chart. Looks good on a chart but the shares outstanding when CDCH was trading at 27 cents (or dollars pre split) have no semblance to the current share structure. Making that reference point completely irrelevant. If that weren’t the case CDCH would have been trading at a $2 billion market cap ($27 x 70M) back in 2011.

It should, but won’t, also remind folks that this miraculous “tight” share count is simply the result of a reverse split but who wants to be a downer.

Feel free to shoot the messenger. I fully understand that facts are not welcome in these parts. Please pass the ketchup.

Looks like we have entered the 4 to 12 week initial testing phase. See AI summary below:

Typical Timeline Breakdown Once the plant is fully assembled:

  • Commissioning and initial testing (dry/wet commissioning, no-load to loaded runs, equipment calibration, flotation circuit tuning with initial ore): This usually takes 4–12 weeks for small-scale flotation plants. It includes checking pumps, grind circuits, flotation cells, reagent addition, and basic process controls. For modular or pilot-like setups common at this scale, it can be on the shorter end (e.g., 1–2 months) if well-engineered.

  • Ramp-up to nameplate capacity and stable production (introducing ore, achieving consistent recovery/grade targets, process optimization, and reaching commercial/steady-state output): This adds 1–3 months or more, depending on ore variability, operator experience, and any adjustments needed (e.g., reagent optimization or minor modifications). Full production often means consistent 100 tpd throughput with acceptable gold recovery (typically 80–90%+ for flotation).

Overall, from assembly completion to reliable production, it normally takes 3–6 months in Chile for a small gold flotation plant, assuming no major issues. This aligns with general mining commissioning for similar-scale concentrators (e.g., copper-gold flotation plants in Chile often see 4–6 months for commissioning/start-up phases in larger contexts, but smaller plants trend shorter due to simpler design).

13 Likes

Looking forward to an exciting week!

7 Likes

Hey Husker, if you’re there, do us a favor and try to put a finger on how much in production MC aspires to and how much the current equipment we have can actually support - would be interesting to know. I understand the German guy saying that scaling up would be easy, but that’s a piece that’s currently missing. Thanks in advance.

OH SORRY - I just saw that the company posted this picture on Twitter(X).

2 Likes

Probably missed this before, but don’t recall the Auryn Mining “Group” being used.

Looks like it consists of Auryn, Masglas, American Sierra Gold and EGM Mining Columbia.

Regarding EGM Mining Columbia…

Mr. Cordova serves as Chairman and President of two publicly listed companies: American Sierra Gold Corp. (AMNP) and Auryn Mining Corporation (AUMC). He is also the majority owner of EGM Colombia, a privately operating gold mining company in Antioquia, Colombia, with active production.

If you zoom in on the photo, looks like that company produce 12,000 oz recently and is on track to produce 20,000 oz annually with a floatation plant expansion. That Company has 400 employees.

Looks like Mr Cordova is doing pretty well for himself recently.

EDIT:

PDAC photo from last year…looks like it was called Auryn Mining Group then as well.

6 Likes

Are we to see some buying coming in this week from this Convention?

1 Like

PDAC photo from THIS year, posted just a minute ago:

5 Likes

But, can anyone name everyone in the photo? Also, they’re not tucked away in a corner this year.

1 Like

POG looking poised to get back over $5.5k. The Iran war should help matters. CHG, please ask MC why he keeps publicizing about a stockpile that is worthless. TIA

1 Like

These were great to see MG. Thanks for posting. We shareholders may have news sooner, however, I just thought I’d mention when I expect to see Quarterly filings. For non-accelerated filers, reports are due 45 days after the fiscal quarter ends

• Q1 2026 (period ending March 31): Due May 15, 2026.

• Q2 2026 (period ending June 30): Due August 14, 2026.

Q3 2026 (period ending September 30): Due November 16, 2026 (Extended from Nov 14 due to the weekend).

I do expect good things to happen this year. Patience is required.

EM

8 Likes

Patience required! Understatement

3 Likes

With everything moving in a positive direction with production about to start and the conference going on there’s no volume coming in. 1 share traded so far today.

1 Like

Consider yourself lucky. If this were a “real” stock with actual price discovery/liquidity it would be getting smashed along with the rest of the sector.

1 Like

I guess non of our talented folks here went to the PDAC in Toronto.. would have loved to see what the information and latest updates from the Auryn team were show casing.. No new information on website.

So, yes I guess patience is a virtue :relieved_face:

1 Like

We should be getting an update in April but would like hear something sooner.

3 Likes

I put Grok AI to a little image processing test. Mr Grok was able to read the left panel as follows:

Readable Text from the Left Panel (Top to Bottom)

Main Heading (large, bold, prominent at the top):
FORTUNA DE LAMPA
CHILE
High-Grade Gold Production – Currently in Operation

Key Highlights / Sub-section (boxed or bulleted area, mid-upper panel):

  • 100% Owned by AURYN Mining Corporation (AUMC) via Chilean subsidiary

  • Located ~30 km NW of Santiago in the Altos de Lipangue District

  • Permitted small-scale production: Up to 1,000 tonnes per month (under Chile’s small mining producer regime)

  • Expansion application submitted to SERNAGEOMIN: Increase to 3,000 tonnes per month

  • New fully equipped mining camp completed: Solar-powered + Starlink connectivity for real-time monitoring

  • Active development: Antonino Tunnel, DL2 Vein, Northwest Drift

Milestones Timeline / Key Dates (visible in a vertical or horizontal callout section):

  • First official blast in Northwest Drift: January 2026

  • Camp construction and infrastructure upgrades: Completed 2025–2026

  • Plans for 100 tonnes per day (tpd) flotation plant – financing in place, construction targeted for near-term

Geology & Operational Details (lower-mid bullets, smaller but clear font):

  • High-grade quartz vein system hosted in granodiorite

  • Selective mining methods (jack-leg drilling) to minimize dilution

  • Focus on DL2 Vein and upper levels (e.g., Fortuna 1913 level integration)

  • Sustainable & responsible practices emphasized

  • Workforce accommodation, safety ventilation upgrades, and environmental compliance

Visual Elements with Associated Text Labels (photos/diagrams on the panel):

  • Large central photo: Underground workings / tunnel face (labeled “Northwest Drift Development”)

  • Inset photos: New mining camp exterior (labeled “Solar-Powered Camp”), core samples (labeled “High-Grade DL2 Vein Core”), site overview map (labeled “Location: 30 km NW Santiago”)

  • Small cross-section diagram: Vein structure in host rock (no specific g/t numbers visible in text overlays here, but implies narrow high-grade veins)

Bottom Footer / Small Text (running across base):
AURYN Mining Corporation – Advancing Responsible Gold Production in Chile
aurynminingcorp.com | Follow updates on exploration and production progress

No specific gold grades (e.g., g/t Au), tonnage resources, or exact revenue figures are prominently listed on this panel—it’s more focused on operational status, permits, infrastructure, and ramp-up plans rather than detailed resource estimates (those may be in investor decks or the website).

Not much new here.

4 Likes

But the center panel has a few interesting tidbits:
Exact text I can read from the Center Panel in this official image

Main heading (large bold across the top):
CHILE EXPLORATION PROJECTS
Altos de Lipangue District – Chile

The panel is split into two equal sections:

Left half – PROJECT PRINCESA LARA

  • High-grade gold-silver vein system

  • Historical channel sampling returned values up to 15.2 g/t Au and 120 g/t Ag

  • 2026 exploration program: detailed mapping, sampling, and diamond drilling planned

  • Located within the consolidated Altos de Lipangue land package

(accompanied by clear photos of vein outcrops, drill core, and a small location map)

Right half – PROJECT LOS ACEITES & FORTUNA BRECCIA

  • Large breccia-hosted gold target with strong surface mineralization

  • Fully permitted for exploration

  • Potential future ore feed source for the planned 100 tpd flotation plant at Fortuna de Lampa

  • 2025–2026 drilling campaign underway

  • Significant exploration upside in the district

(plus multiple photos of breccia outcrops, mineralized core, and geologic maps)

Bottom banner (small text running across the entire panel):
Part of the 10,500 hectare consolidated Altos de Lipangue Mining District
AURYN Mining Corporation (AUMC) – Focused on responsible gold development in Chile

(plus a QR code linking to aurynminingcorp.com)

Important note: Nothing on this panel mentions American Sierra Gold Corp. It is 100 % Auryn’s own Chilean exploration assets inside the Altos de Lipangue district. This panel is the “exploration upside” story that sits between the producing Fortuna mine (left) and the Colombia project (right).

11 Likes

If I may, what panels are you talking about and where are they located?