Auryn/Medinah 2026 1st half General Discussion

I can answer this one. Considering the market cap is already at $150M the last thing you want is to bring more eyeballs who actually know how to value a project. A 100tpd plant with no resource won’t hold onto this premium valuation under any scrutiny. PPX is up 1000% because they actually explored and developed and knew that trying to skip the line typically ends badly. AUMC has doubled on almost zero volume by speculative retail investors.

PPX has done zero promotion. If you’re referring to their updates/PRs that level of detail is expected. AUMC posts pictures. Who doesn’t love pictures? However, given how little has been disclosed (terms of debt, mine plan, production forecasts, exploration program, etc) no institution nor sophisticated investor would be nuts to take this big of a gamble.

BB, do you have any experience investing in the mining sector or has MDMN/AUMC been your only exposure? Based on your market related comments I have to assume it’s the latter. One of many examples: you cannot calculate a NPV with a resource/mine life. It’s literally not possible. This is also why your reference to a a 30 PE is so “confusing”. This are not complicated concepts to understand. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. I’ll be happy to admit I’m wrong.

You know what they say about assumptions- you know BB has been in mining for decades. Or were you just being facetious along with another of your “absolutes”.

9 Likes

Yes I know that BB has been providing his opinion on MDMN (down 99%, delisted, and AUMC (down 95% post reverse split, down 80% post) for decades. Thats not what I asked.

I’ve never seen him refer to another name he is invested in. He’s taken on a new primary thesis (always focusing on the shiney penny that best suits an optimistic narrative), that AUMC was so smart in keeping the float tight (even though I know for a fact that an attempt to raise money by issuing shares failed). He even seems to be slamming the “typical” miners who have issued the shares to take the steps to actually warrant higher valuations while, in the same breathe, trying to claim AUMC should trade at similar market caps ( PE 30, Lassonde Curve, etc.). This is, clearly, not rational.

I appreciate he’s focused on the “technical”/geologic aspects of the mountain. I’ve never seen so much analysis and assumptions based on historical results, a miniscule assay directly from the vein, and a whole lot of hunches, but that’s for another day. The more recent trend has been BB attempting to suggest different outcomes/price targets based on all sorts of completely irrelavant comparatives. He doesn’t seem to understand how P/Es nor NPV nor basic valuation across the mining sector are applied This was the basis of my question.

This is what you don’t get (as usual): BB is not “slamming” the typical miner as much as he is trying to make the intractable sector of our population realize that the tight share structure we have is more than just a nice attribute.

We’ll see who has the best EPS at the end of this calendar year: AUMC or “the typical miner” (the type that BB “slams”). NOTE TO FILE: A company that has 921M shares outstanding is gonna have to produce 13.15 times MORE gold equivalent than a company that has 70M shares outstanding just to break even, assuming the same AISC. Good luck with that.

And yes, EPS does matter, because it is eventually reflected in the share price ……. and (gasp) dividends.

9 Likes

I don’t know what you have to complain about here Baldy. Maybe you remember making this response when I mentioned I had followed up on your recommendation you made about Spartan Resources:

Easy.

“I have no interest in reading through a thread with a bunch of “graveyard” stocks. … Based on your “bitter tone” I’m very skeptical you actually followed my recommendation. “You can lead a horse to water but…”

Well I did, thank you, and I now have a position in Ramelius Resources NPV (RMS:AU) after Spartan was acquired by Ramelius.

Maybe a few here will recall two years ago I posted a list of stocks. A few shareholders Responded. From that original list on the Other Current stock thread I’m posting a few charts from the stocks first mentioned over there. FYI, these are a sample of the “bunch of “graveyard” stocks” that Baldy was referring to. As has been mentioned in the past, the proper place to bring attention to other stocks is not a “ping pong” conversation cluttering up this thread. Consider utilizing the updated an underused thread titled Other current mining stocks created by Cabezon in hopes it would gain greater utilization.

EM

7 Likes

Don’t be coy- you know I was referring to OTHER mining stocks Bb has been involved with. It is not my place to mention them by name, some of which I own or owned such as copper or silver miners.

5 Likes

In the early stages of a miner going into production yes EPS matters but my experience shows cashflow is more important since they usually have high initial capital costs which they tried to amortize fairly quickly.. So to me what is more important is seeing high positive operating cashflow.. JMO

7 Likes

Is there any hope for shares of MDMN or are they toast.

1 Like

Lots of hope - the company has publicly acknowledged that they are holding the AUMC shares in our behalf. They even commenced a receivership proceeding in Nevada state court to marshal the assets, liabilities, and make an orderly disposition of whatever is left over, including the AUMC shares. IMHO, your AUMC shares are not just gonna disappear. You could file a petition to intervene if you’re worried about it - but that’s not what I’m doing, because I trust Wizard to get it done right.

4 Likes

Thanks Bubba

Please provide an example for reference.

Thx EZ. Happy to be of service. Spartan was a home run before the sector really started to move. RMS is getting closer to fully valued but still seems to have room to run, There are no more “graveyard “ stocks in the precious metals space. If you own something that’s not up 5x over the last 18 months it’s considered a “laggard.” This being said, I’m well aware of your past references to other miners but I was not addressing you.

Separately, this has got to be be the chart of the week:

1 Like

For once, finally, I will agree with that. Congratulations.

2 Likes

Plant completion date targeted for Jan 30th. Would be nice if they followed that statement up with verification it happened or not. If not, why not? If yes, tell us.

2 Likes

My day is complete

2 Likes

They also said they would announce when/if they receive permitting. There’s nothing they can do until this happens.

1 Like

Baldy,

If you want to discuss other stocks please take it to the “Other current mining stocks board”. That’s what the other thread is for. This forum is for AUMC, not your entertainment pleasure.

EM

7 Likes

DOES AURYN LIKELY HAVE A 2-PLUS MILLION OUNCE DEPOSIT?

After seeing the chart of how no new 2 million ounce gold deposits have been discovered for a couple of years, the question might come up as to what are the chances that Auryn currently owns a 100% stake in a 2 million ounce deposit at the ADL Mining District. First of all, let me make it 100% clear that for Auryn to be included on a list of miners that have “OFFICIALLY” made a 2 million ounce gold discovery, they would have to sell hundreds of millions of shares in order to raise the money needed to fully drill out the deposit and execute a series of studies including a Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA), a Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS), and a Bankable Feasibility Study (BFS). This is despite the fact that the deposit is CLEARLY “ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE”.

Thankfully, Auryn cannot be FORCED to do this by a major miner demanding that the project be “DE-RISKED” prior to them being willing to get involved. Auryn needs neither their money nor their technical expertise to enter into extremely high-grade production at a time in which the price of gold is near $5,000 per ounce. If Auryn were to be compelled to “make the case” that they are indeed sitting on at least a 2 million ounce gold deposit, how might they do this without suffering all of that SHARE STRUCTURE DILUTION?

There are a variety of routes Auryn could take to make this case. Many years ago, they completed an exhaustive trench sampling program on the ADL plateau. They mapped the course of and identified over 5,000-lineal-meters of veins that made it all of the way to the current surface. What they discovered/confirmed was the existence of a geological “VEIN SET” consisting of approximately 7 Main Veins all but one of which (the Merlin 3 Vein) are oriented in parallel striking from NNW to SSE. They successfully traced one of these veins, the Don Luis2 Vein, down to a depth of 700-meters.

In a massive vein deposit like this that has yet to be fully drilled out, there is a very simple means to ROUGHLY ESTIMATE the tonnage of ore present and ROUGHLY ESTIMATE the number of “contained gold ounces” held within that tonnage. What you do is multiply the combined known length of the veins (5,000 meters), by their average width and then multiply that by their known extension to depth. In the case of Auryn’s vein deposit, you’d multiply the 5,000-meter known extent of the “strike” at surface, by an average width of, let’s say 1-meter,and then multiply that total by the 700-meter depth figure. This gives you a “VOLUME” of 3.5 million cubic meters of VEIN MATERIAL.

In order to convert this “VOLUME” figure into “TONNAGE” you need to multiply that 3.5 million cubic meters figure by the “SPECIFIC GRAVITY” (a fancy term for “density”) of granodiorite, which is 2.7 Tonnes per cubic meter. This then gives you a “TOTAL TONNAGE” figure of 9.45 million tonnes of vein material within that “Vein Set”.

Next, you need to estimate the “AVERAGE GRADE” of the vein material itself in order to estimate the number of “CONTAINED GOLD OUNCES” within the vein material. Note that this “AVERAGE GRADE” figure is going to be higher than the “AVERAGE GRADE” of the ore being mined because during mining some of the less well-mineralized rock material surrounding the vein itself will be mined. In making “CONTAINED GOLD OUNCES” estimations, you limit your analysis to vein material within the vein proper.

Estimating the “AVERAGE GRADE” of the ore within the vein material proper necessitates the study of all previously acquired information relating to the grades mined and detected throughout time. This is a complicated topic that deserves attention. I’d start with the fact that the artisanal miners mined a 350-meter stretch of the DL2 Vein’s 1,000-meter surface “strike” down to a depth of about 100-meters. They achieved an “AVERAGE GRADE” of 64 gpt gold from 1940 to 1970. The TONNAGE mined was approximately 2,000 Tonnes i.e. a “mom and pop” type of operation.

They were mining from levels 0, 1, and 2 of the DL2 Vein. The artisanal miners had pretty much zero technology available to enhance their AVERAGE GRADE. About all they could do was VISUALLY SORT the ore and discard what appeared to be nonmineralized ore. Interestingly, their mining operations were so inefficient that many of the “tailings dumps” they left behind for Auryn and Medinah are currently carrying 14 gpt gold grades. These “tailings dumps” sit outside of the portals to the adits leading to level 1 and 2.

Auryn intersected “level 3” of the DL2 Vein in early January of 2023. Level 3 is located about 30-meters below level 2 at approximately the 1,850-meters above sea level elevation. THE AVERAGE GRADES DETECTED AT LEVEL 3 WERE MUCH HIGHER THAN THOSE ENCOUNTERED IN LEVELS 0,1, AND 2 (64 gpt). At the new intersection of level 3 and the DL2 Vein, Auryn executed 2 groupings of channel samples. The first grouping of 4 separate channel samples came in at an AVERAGE GRADE of 164 gpt gold. The second grouping came in at an AVERAGE GRADE of 150 gpt gold.

Auryn sent in a 2,200 pound sample from level 3 to Enami for smelter testing. This significant-sized sample came back with AVERAGE GRADES of 57 gpt gold, 983 gpt silver, and 3.23% copper. This represents a “gold equivalent” AVERAGE GRADE of 70 gpt gold. This was slightly higher than the AVERAGE GRADE achieved by the artisanal miners. After getting these stellar results (the average grade of gold being mined in similar underground “narrow vein” mining worldwide is 4.18 gpt gold), Auryn sent in another batch of samples, this time to the smelter testing facility of the Plenge Lab in Lima, Peru. These results came back with not an average gold grade of 57 gpt gold like the Enami smelter test, but instead an average gold grad of 128 gpt gold. Upon receiving this result, Auryn’s BOD unanimously decided not to do business with Enami but to instead build their own processing plant and bypass Enami and what appeared to be usurious “tolling fees”.

Clearly, the grades at the DL2 Vein have been stellar from the beginning. Recall that the ESTIMATED TONNAGE calculated from just the 7 Main Veins that made it to surface, came in at about 9.45 million Tonnes of vein material. Keep in mind also that one Troy ounce per Tonne equates to 31.1 gpt. Thus, 9.45 million Tonnes of vein ore averaging, let’s say, just 15.5 gpt gold (0.5 ounces per tonne), would represent about 4.7 million ounces of gold just in the veins that made it to surface IF THE VARIOUS OTHER INPUT VARIABLES HOLD UP. Clearly, one could make the case for a much higher AVERAGE GRADE than 0.5 Ounces per Tonne, but I’m not going to make that case.

In addition to the gold contained within the veins that made it all of the way to surface, Auryn also has gold contained within the Pegaso Nero copper/moly porphyry prospect, the LDM stratabound gold/copper deposit, the 24 new “structures/veins/faults” discovered while drifting the Antonino Adit, as well as any yet to be discovered deposits at the ADL Mining District. The amount of precious and nonprecious metals contained within the Pegaso Nero will likely dwarf the ounces contained within the veins that made it to surface but that is going to take a lot of exploration and development work to confirm. The ridge crest sampling program completed at the Pegaso Nero deposit revealed a 1.2 Km by 3.6 Km area with high-grade areas of both gold and moly right at the surface on the southern downslope off of the ADL plateau.

So, does Auryn’s ADL Mining District deserve to be included in the list of discoveries weighing in at over 2 million ounces? My answer is ABSOLUTELY NOT AS OF TODAY BECAUSE, AGAIN, THAT LIST APPLIES ONLY TO FULLY DRILLED OUT DEPOSITS WITH COMPLETED FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

Do I hope that Auryn drops everything and takes 4 years away from production and fully drills out the deposit and then executes those feasibility studies in order to make the “OFFICIAL” list? Absolutely not. The prices of the metals being mined are at or near their all-time highs TODAY. At times like these, you do everything in your power to get any HIGH-GRADE, NEAR SURFACE,EARLY PRODUCTION OPPORTUNITIES into production. Auryn was blessed with many of these; many deposits have none. Later, if Auryn wanted to “make the list”, they could do the drilling and studies using the profits from production instead of the proceeds from selling an enormous amount of shares.

As an investor, I don’t want to trade in an extremely tight share structure (70 million shares outstanding) and a microscopically low number of shares in the “float” (about 7 million shares) for a spot on an “OFFICIAL LIST”. In my mind, the ADL Mining District EASILY qualifies (or will qualify) to be on the “LIST”. As an investor, I need to check off on “boxes”. One of my “boxes” is: does this deposit easily have at least 2 to 3 million gold equivalent ounces. I’ve already checked off on that box without undergoing massive levels of SHARE STRUCTURE DILUTION. Do I need to know the EXACT number of ounces of MR/MR that are in the ground? Absolutely not.

About 5 years ago, Auryn’s Professional Geoscientist, Luciano Bocanegra, did a “Preliminary Resource Estimate” of the number of gold ounces present in just the upper extent of 2 of Auryn’s 7 Main Veins. The number came in at 686,000 gold ounces. This did not include the much higher grades found at level 3 of the DL2 Vein.

In estimating the number of “CONTAINED GOLD OUNCES” in a mineral deposit, there is the concept of a “cut-off grade” that is critical to appreciate. The “cut-off grade” is roughly the grade of ore that results in the miner breaking even on a mining project. Thus, ore with a grade BELOW the “cut-off grade” DOES NOT count towards the number of “contained gold ounces” in a deposit.

When Bocanegra made his “preliminary resource estimate”, the price of gold was around $1,500 per ounce. Since then, the price has moved to about $5,000 per ounce. The “cut-off grade” for economic viability has DROPPED tremendously since Bocanegra’s calculation. This means that a lot of ounces previously slightly below the old cut-off grade are now easily “Economic” and need to be counted. That 686,000 gold ounce figure might be 50 to 100% higher today then back then.

Since Bocanegra did his calculation, Auryn has made significant advances in the “development” of the vein system, especially at level 3. Although they did not involve diamond drilling, these advances have markedly increased the number of “contained gold ounces”. The drifting of horizontal adits is basically an extra wide drill hole oriented horizontally instead of vertically. They both help outline a 3-dimensional “block model” of the mineral deposit. In combination, Medinah and Auryn have completed a total of 31 diamond drill holes to date.

Auryn just completed a 66-meter vertical “raise” from level 3 up to the “old workings” in levels 1 and 2. This has the potential to add significantly to the “contained gold ounces” count. In 2 separate quarterly updates, Auryn cited that they were busy blocking out new ounces of MINERAL RESERVES/MINERAL RESOURCES (MR/MR). As of yet they have not updated the shareholders on the current estimation of “contained gold ounces”.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN WHEN YOU ARE ADVANCING INTO EXTREMELY HIGH-GRADE PRODUCTION AT A TIME IN WHICH THERE HAVE BEEN NO NEW GOLD DISCOVERIES AND THE PRICES OF THE 3 METALS BEING MINED AND SOLD ARE AT OR NEAR THEIR ALL-TIME HIGHS?

The best way to irrefutably confirm a new gold “DISCOVERY” is to put it into PRODUCTION. Many new “DISCOVERIES” will never make it into PRODUCTION or they might currently be a half dozen years from commencing PRODUCTION. The problem is that the metals prices are going nuts TODAY. The lack of new discoveries is going to put upward pressure on gold prices for some time to come. Gold mines represent “depleting assets”. With time, the miners have found themselves going deeper and deeper in search of lower and lower grade ore. Many of the majors have curtailed their own exploration budgets because of the low chances for success and they rely more and more on the junior miners for not only new discoveries but also for doing what is necessary to advance the project into production and thereby “DE-RISK” it.

When a junior advances a project into PRODUCTION, this means that almost all of the RISK has already been mitigated. The remaining RISK usually centers around OPERATIONAL RISKS which are always present. A thoroughly “DERISKED” project already in production at a time in which the metals prices are breaking out to the upside and there are not many other new “discoveries” available to compete with them, are worth a lot of money. The majors MUST constantly replace the ounces they annually produce by either expensively drilling out new ounces and executing the necessary studies or by taking out junior miners with viable discoveries especially if they have already been “DE-RISKED” and are already in PRODUCTION.

Although the high-grade gold veins and the cash flow they are about to generate is going to be wonderful for Auryn and Medinah shareholders, the “elephant in the room”, in my opinion, is still the Pegaso Nero copper/moly porphyry prospect. Without any fanfare, Auryn just added Robert Mayne-Nicholl to their team. He recently ran 2 of the top 7 or 8 producing mines of all time i.e. Los Pelambres and Collahuasi, both in Chile. These are both “world class”, Tier 1 porphyry projects.

In this sector, there is a saying that the category known as “NEW PRODUCERS” is almost always empty. A “NEW PRODUCER” either gets rapidly taken out by a major or a mid-tier or it rapidly advances into becoming a “mid-tier” producer. The most recent gigantic success story in this sector was probably “Great Bear Mining”. They executed a drill program and before they blocked out even one ounce of “OFFICIAL MR/MR”, Kinross took them out for about $2 billion. Their property will be in PRODUCTION probably by 2030.

7 Likes

I have no interest in your board. I appreciate that you are trying to bring traffic over there but “other” stocks are constantly being referenced here (ex: PPX) as they relate to the convo on AUMC

I think I might need to limit my responses to AI so as to dispel any “BB bias.” These responses are not meant for the vocal minority who will not be swayed despite overwhelming facts but more to the “quite majority” who are trying to follow the merits of this investment objectively.

**

What were the results of Auryns trench sample and could they be used to estimate a resource?

**

They provide valuable data on grade, continuity, and extent in exposed areas, and can support Inferred resources if spacing and QA/QC are sufficient to demonstrate geological/grade continuity.

• However, trenches are shallow (typically surface to <10-20 m) and 2D, so they alone rarely suffice for a full 3D resource model or higher-confidence categories (Indicated or Measured) under standards like NI 43-101, JORC, or CIM.

• For Medinah/Auryn’s Altos de Lipangue project:
• No formal NI 43-101-compliant mineral resource estimate appears to have been published based primarily or solely on these trench results.
• The data helped prioritize targets, guide drilling, and highlight potential, but subsequent work shifted toward drilling (e.g., historical holes intersected mineralization, but no updated resource from trenches alone).
• Trench data could be incorporated into a broader database for estimation if combined with drilling, geophysics, and other info—but standalone, it would likely only support preliminary or conceptual estimates due to depth limitations and potential subsurface variability.

• In epithermal vein systems like this (high-grade but structurally complex), trenches excel for discovery and delineation but require deeper confirmation (drilling) for reliable ounce/tonnage calculations.

In summary, the trench results were impressive for surface grades and extent, showing significant high-grade gold potential (e.g., averages around 26.9 g/t Au in key zones), but they are best used as exploration tools rather than the primary basis for a formal resource estimate. For a definitive resource, drilling integration would be essential.

**

Would the stock market discount any value based on these trench results ?

**

Why the Market Discounts This Value

• No Formal Resource Estimate: The impressive trench data never translated into a compliant (e.g., NI 43-101) mineral resource estimate or economic study. Trench results are surface-only and preliminary; without deeper drilling confirmation and a 3D model, they don’t support reliable tonnage/ounce calculations that institutions or serious investors require.

• Historical Context and Time Decay: The standout trench results date back to ~2015-2016. In junior mining, positive early exploration data can spike speculative stocks temporarily (e.g., hype on forums/message boards like InvestorsHub or The Mining Play), but without follow-through (drilling success, JV, acquisition) enthusiasm fades.

In short, while the trench results were genuinely exciting for exploration potential at the time (high-grade veins exposed over kilometers), the market will not assign value to them. This is common for many junior explorers where surface hits don’t progress to bankable assets—value only materializes with de-risking steps like resources, feasibility, or buyouts, none of which have occurred here in a way that benefits shareholders materially.