Other Mining Stocks

NVO

Weekly Interval: This stock is in a confirmed downtrend since it failed to push up through the 62% retracement of its prior 2.45 - 8.83 range. Immediate resistance on this chart is the 20 EMA, currently at 4.50, with horizontal support in the mid - 3.80’s and an uptrend line that is currently helping to support that level.

Daily Interval: Upon a second test of resistance at the 62% retracement level (yellow ellipse) the stock gapped down and only pushed a small increment into the gap zone before trending lower. The gap is represented by the yellow area between the two pink horizontal lines and should be considered strong resistance. The nice thing about a gap like this is that, when the stock does recover that price range, it then provides a strong area of support moving forward. For now watch support levels in the upper 3.70’s and the daily 20 EMA currently at 4.16. The 130 MA is first resistance at 4.56.

2 Likes

Snagged this from stockhouse….thought it was interesting.

Interesting abstract from gold18@perth meeting

Conglomerate-hosted gold deposits in an evolving basin

John Youngson

Biography Dr John Youngson (MAusIMM CP(Geo) MSEG MIMMS) has over 25 years’ experience in gold exploration and ore deposits research and holds an MSc and a PhD in economic geology from the University of Otago. He is a Director and Principal Consultant for Youngson Geoscience Consultants and Marine Minerals Group and has worked on exploration and mining projects in numerous countries in North America, South America, the western Pacific, Europe, and eastern and southern Africa. John is a specialist in sediment-hosted deposits and has worked extensively with Major, mid-tier and Junior companies investigating and developing terrestrial and marine placer, paleoplacer gold and diamonds, and orogenic gold deposits. He has also worked extensively in active tectonics and landscape evolution.

”Nuggets from areas across the northern Pilbara are typically encased by Fe-rich chlorite, through which a ‘cloud’ of pristine, secondary gold is variably disseminated (Falconer 2018). Widespread occurrence of such cloud-encased nuggets across the north Pilbara and a distinctive REE inclusion suite within the secondary gold argues for a basin-wide gold overprint, possibly from Fe- and gold-rich seawater during marine transgressions. This is supported by paleoplacer mineralisation styles and paleoenvironmental settings in the east Pilbara, where marine transgressions played a fundamental role in development and enrichment of the paleoplacers.”

What Dr. Youngson is suggesting here is that there was a basin-wide gold overprint that originated from seawater, and among the evidence he notes is a distinctive REE (presumably rare earth elements) suite of markers across a wide geographic area that is associated with the gold deposition. Given his background, his suggestion of a basin-wide gold overprint is noteworthy.

Read more at Stockhouse

1 Like

RIch - thanks for making me lazy. :slight_smile:

I’m inherently lazy Rick. Happy to share the wealth! :slight_smile:

Nice report of drill results from Artemis this morning (Australian time):
http://artemisresources.com.au/investors-relations/announcements

This is on a property of theirs not currently associated with the conglomerate play but cobalt, copper, and gold. It has a formal resource presently of 2.4Mt, which is modest. But these and earlier July drill results indicate this will be increasing. And the resource is expected eventually to be able to provide ore to their Radio Hill plant, 35Km away.

1 Like

I liked this section of the report (thanks for posting):

Carlow Castle
This site is 35 km from the 500,000 tpa (41.7tpm) Radio Hill processing plant, which is 100% owned by Artemis. Gold, Nickle, and CU in the latest drill report (with previous CO and zinc resources reported) make this more than a conglomerate play. There are three 50:50 joint ventures between Novo Resources and three of the subsidiaries of Artemis. (Disclosure - I have invested in this as a long-term core investment.)

(the above post was #52! Followed a long time.) also:

Just an update on an oldie but goodie (see previous posts):

Inventus Mining Files Technical Report on Pardo Project
TORONTO, Aug. 07, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) – Inventus Mining Corp. (TSX VENTURE: IVS) (“Inventus” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce that it has received an updated technical report prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) on the 100% owned Pardo Paleoplacer Gold Project located 65 km northeast of Sudbury, Ontario (the “Technical Report”).

The Technical Report dated August 3, 2018 is entitled “Technical Report on the Pardo Paleoplacer Gold Project Ontario, Canada” and was prepared by independent Qualified Persons (as the term is defined in NI 43-101) at Nordmin Engineering Ltd. in Thunder Bay, Ontario. The Technical Report is available for download on the Company’s website (inventusmining.com) and SEDAR (sedar.com).

Project Milestones

The previous technical report on Pardo was completed in 2015, and since then Inventus has accomplished six important milestones which are highlighted in the new Technical Report, including:

Consolidating 100% property ownership in Inventus,
Converting the core claims to a mining lease and upgrading the project to advanced exploration,
Completing the first 3D geological model of the property,
Processing the first one thousand tonne bulk sample that returned a calculated head grade to 4.2 grams per tonne gold,
Submitting the first mining permit application for the project in support of a 50,000 tonne bulk sample scheduled to begin later this year, and
Conducting the first quantitative risk assessment and estimation of the exploration target range.
Inventus Mining Files Technical Report on Pardo Project

Weekly Chart Interval

2 Likes

That’s a really nice weekly chart on Inventus. The stock has historically rallied in the late summer due to the company being active with exploration in the warmer weather. During the winter they tend to get quiet and that is reflected in teh share price. The key this time around will be if their expanded bulk sample program will return similar results as last year. The bulk sample program last year just about paid for itself when all was said and done. I’m hoping for more (or better) of the same while expanding the resource and confidence level. I just wish my funds had cleared a couple weeks sooner. I’m waiting for a pull back here, but it is the wrong time to expect one with this stock.

1 Like

Inventus Mining Files Technical Report on Pardo Project

August 07, 2018 16:15 ET | Source: Inventus Mining Corp.
TORONTO, Aug. 07, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) – Inventus Mining Corp. (TSX VENTURE: IVS) (“Inventus” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce that it has received an updated technical report prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) on the 100% owned Pardo Paleoplacer Gold Project located 65 km northeast of Sudbury, Ontario (the “Technical Report”).

The Technical Report dated August 3, 2018 is entitled “Technical Report on the Pardo Paleoplacer Gold Project Ontario, Canada” and was prepared by independent Qualified Persons (as the term is defined in NI 43-101) at Nordmin Engineering Ltd. in Thunder Bay, Ontario. The Technical Report is available for download on the Company’s website (inventusmining.com) and SEDAR (sedar.com).

Project Milestones

The previous technical report on Pardo was completed in 2015, and since then Inventus has accomplished six important milestones which are highlighted in the new Technical Report, including:

Consolidating 100% property ownership in Inventus,
Converting the core claims to a mining lease and upgrading the project to advanced exploration,
Completing the first 3D geological model of the property,
Processing the first one thousand tonne bulk sample that returned a calculated head grade to 4.2 grams per tonne gold,
Submitting the first mining permit application for the project in support of a 50,000 tonne bulk sample scheduled to begin later this year, and
Conducting the first quantitative risk assessment and estimation of the exploration target range.
Exploration Target Range

The Technical Report provides an assessment of the exploration target range for the Pardo Project using a quantitative approach that integrated the available drill holes, channel sampling, bulk sampling and geological information.

The exploration target range is expressed in terms of pessimistic, moderate and optimistic cases. Following the conventional use of such distributions, the 10th percentile (P10) defines a pessimistic case, the 50th percentile (P50) defines the moderate case, and the 90th percentile (P90) defines an optimistic case for the mineralized Mississagi Boulder Conglomerate unit.

The pessimistic case (P10) assumes that the mineralization is only confined to the zones that were bulk sampled and/or have extensive channel sampling and drilling at the Trench 1, Trench 2, 007, Godzilla, Eastern Reef and High Grade occurrences.

The moderate case (P50) assumes that approximately 50% of the mineralization defined is continuous within the boundaries of the mineralized Mississagi Boulder Conglomerate unit.

The optimistic case (P90) assumes that the mineralization between these zones is continuous and extends to the currently known boundaries of the mineralized Mississagi Boulder Conglomerate unit.
The P10, P50 and P90 range for the exploration target at the Pardo Project is rounded to reflect the inherent uncertainties and is shown in table 1-1.

Table 1-1: Exploration target P10, P50 and P90 ranges for the Pardo Project.

Parameter P10 P50 P90
Tonnage (t) 450,000 8,600,000 12,500,000
Gold Grade (g/t) 4.20 3.50 3.50
Metal Content (oz) 60,000 950,000 1,400,000
The tonnage, grade and contained ounces are conceptual in nature and are based on previous detailed surface mapping and drilling and channel sampling results that define the approximate thickness, depth and grade of the mineralized conglomerate unit.

These ranges are conceptual in nature since the Pardo Project requires further drilling and surface sampling to validate the geological and statistical assumptions used. Although all the technical assumptions are supported by the spatially limited drilling and available geological data at the time, further drilling may challenge these assumptions. As such, there has been insufficient exploration to define a current mineral resource and the company cautions that there is risk that further exploration will not result in the delineation of a current mineral resource.

About Inventus Mining Corp.

Inventus is a mineral exploration and development company focused on the world-class mining district of Sudbury, Ontario. Our principal asset is a 100% interest in the advanced exploration stage Pardo Paleoplacer Gold Project located 65 km northeast of Sudbury. Pardo is the first important paleoplacer gold discovery found in North America. Inventus has 106,971,069 common shares outstanding (117,265,235 shares on a fully diluted basis).

1 Like

I posted this on I-Hub just now:

The NI 43-101 doesn’t refer to resources at this point because there isn’t enough data to support an official resource estimate. However, they do refer to “exploration targets” where they attempt to provide some sort of estimate on tonnage, grade and metal content to the property thus far, using a worst case, middle case and best case scenario.

In the (P10) worst case scenario, the exploration target has 450,000 tonnes of ore with a 4.2 g/t grade and a metal content of 60k ounces. At $1,200/oz, that comes to $72 million.

In the (P50) middle case scenario, the exploration target has 8.6 million tonnes of ore with a 3.5 g/t grade and a metal content of 950k ounces. At $1,200/oz, that comes to $780 million.

And finally, in the (P90) best case scenario, the exploration target has 12.5 million tonnes of ore with a 3.5 g/t grade and a metal content of 1.4 million ounces. At $1,200/oz, that comes to $1.68 billion.

Obviously this is a very rough estimate, though it is based on the geological data, exploration and bulk sampling completed to date. It also doesn’t include extraction, expansion and further exploration costs. However, it at least provides shareholders (and financiers) a certain level of valuation that can be associated with the property and the company. The upcoming bulk 5,000 tonne bulk sample, along with the ore sorting techniques, will provide even more data and help to further refine the estimate.

As an Inventus shareholder, I’m very pleased. So must Mr. McEwen and Mr. Sprott!

2 Likes

Thanks Rick, for all the DD you have continued to post and analyze on the Pardo Paleoplacer Gold Project. For anyone interested, you had it right way back when in post # 628 when you analyzed the significance of the results from the initial 1,000 tonne bulk sample.

The planned future bulk sample for later this year is now 50,000 tonnes, increased from the earlier 10,000 tonnes originally planned. Of great significance is the expansion of the exploration program provided by the closing of the Endurance arbitration a couple years back which delayed progress. Inventus management changed strategy for developing this from purely speculative to a lower risk project. Recall last summer’s announcement “Inventus Mining Exploration Update, Drilling Intercepts 22.9 gpt gold over 1.25 m” which greatly lowered the risk for pushing permits and plans forward (see June 6 - News — Inventus Mining):

TORONTO, ONTARIO (June 6, 2017) - Inventus Mining Corp. (TSX VENTURE: IVS)(“Inventus” or the “Company”) today announces that it has received assay results for the next twenty-seven consecutive holes of the winter drill program at the 100% owned Pardo Paleoplacer Gold Project (“Pardo”) near Sudbury, Ontario. The drilling program is now complete with a total of 65 holes drilled. Assay results for the final five holes are pending.

Gold-bearing conglomerate layers or “reefs” at Pardo are horizontal and typically 1-3 metres (m) in thickness. Reefs are laterally extensive and occur on or very near surface. Higher gold grades occur concentrated in fluvial channels or “pay streaks”, and valleys in the footwall upon which the mineralized conglomerate was deposited.

Does the above highlighted passage remind anyone of the description of the conglomerate reefs of the northern Pilbara? I think basing the current P10, P50 and P90 range for the exploration targets and projected future tonnage, grade and contained ounces at the Pardo Project on a surface 1,000 tonne low grade bulk sample is very wise and purposeful strategy. Clearly the current strategy is designed to “under promise and over deliver” on the results of the next 50,000 bulk sampling results by setting a low standard expectation, and then exceeding that standard. IMO
As an Inventus shareholder, I patiently anticipate good results and an ROI worthy of all the delays. Yes, I’m also very pleased.

1 Like

FWIW NOV is down over 5% this morning

Novo Resources Presentation at Diggers and Dealers 2018

http://www.novoresources.com/_resources/presentations/Novo-Resources-corporate-presentation-Aug-8-2018-video.pdf

Regarding NOV, this is not something I feel strongly confident about but it’s worth mentioning. The red trend lines outline, potentially, but not perfectly, a falling wedge formation… also known as a bullish wedge. You’ll notice that there isn’t a lot of room left inside the formation for something to happen, but if this is in fact a bullish wedge then the measured move higher would take you to between $6 - $6.50. If you’re long anyway then you have something potentially positive to look forward to short-term, but I’m not putting any money on it.

2 Likes

Don’t know if this has been posted yet. The discoverer was looking for wild cattle !!!

Rod

The guy who started the Pilbara gold rush found ‘thousands and thousands’ of nuggets

2 Likes

Rich, I noticed you don’t use Bollinger Bands. Is there any particular reason, or do you use them later in determining a buy or sell ?

Rod

I used to use them Rod but I found they had two effects that I didn’t like: 1. The more “stuff” I have on the charts the more it tends to limit my vision. BB’s had the effect of “corralling” the data in a way that made it hard for me to see other things like formations. For me, the less cluttered a chart is the easier it is for my vision to see what is in the candlesticks, which to me is the most important info on a chart. 2. I found BB’s to be less dependable than other things I use to determine highs and lows.

Overall, it’s just personal preference. I don’t have anything against them. Whatever works for a person is what is best for them, imo.

The $HUI index has just about returned to the low of the GFC in 2008. Only that incredible low in the 2nd half of 2015 remains. Many of the major gold minors have been very weak recently. If the $HUI breaks 150 it’s possible it tests the 2015 lows. And that depends on what the price of gold (POG) does. If it breaks below $1200, watch out below. At some point the POG will start to recover and then look for a recovery in the miners / $HUI potentially like the first part of 2016.

2 Likes

TR… if possible when you have time can you please give me your opinion on EXK charts. Thanks greatly appreciated.